Where Will Salesforce Stock Be in 5 Years?
Salesforce (NYSE: CRM) just turned in a quarter that, on…
Sell
50
GXC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$83.76
Seasonality move
:
1.22%
Day range:
$83.20 - $84.09
52-week range:
$64.69 - $97.17
Dividend yield:
2.54%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
24.3K
Avg. volume:
18.7K
1-year change:
14.77%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GMF
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$83.68 | -- | -- | -- | $1.50 | 2.54% | -- |
|
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF
|
$36.38 | -- | -- | -- | $0.34 | 1.59% | -- |
|
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
|
$45.45 | -- | -- | -- | $0.66 | 3.55% | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
$18.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.34 | 3.67% | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
$42.49 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 2.79% | -- |
|
GMF
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
|
$119.95 | -- | -- | -- | $1.58 | 1.85% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 0.849 | -- | -- |
|
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF
|
-- | 0.433 | -- | -- |
|
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
|
-- | 1.820 | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | 1.154 | -- | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
-- | 1.344 | -- | -- |
|
GMF
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
|
-- | 0.480 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GMF
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
SPDR S&P China ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or DBAW?
Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- DBAWXtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or DBAW?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 DBAWXtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or DBAW More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.889, which suggesting that the stock is 11.099% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF has a beta of 0.700, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.988%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or DBAW?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or DBAW?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- DBAWXtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or EWD?
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Sweden ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- EWDiShares MSCI Sweden ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or EWD?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Sweden ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Sweden ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Sweden ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 EWDiShares MSCI Sweden ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or EWD More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.889, which suggesting that the stock is 11.099% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Sweden ETF has a beta of 1.358, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.784%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or EWD?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. iShares MSCI Sweden ETF offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Sweden ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or EWD?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Sweden ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Sweden ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Sweden ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Sweden ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- EWDiShares MSCI Sweden ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or EWH?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or EWH?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or EWH More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.889, which suggesting that the stock is 11.099% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.437%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or EWH?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF offers a yield of 3.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or EWH?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or EWQ?
iShares MSCI France ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI France ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- EWQiShares MSCI France ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or EWQ?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI France ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI France ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI France ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 EWQiShares MSCI France ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or EWQ More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.889, which suggesting that the stock is 11.099% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI France ETF has a beta of 1.248, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.826%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or EWQ?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. iShares MSCI France ETF offers a yield of 2.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI France ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or EWQ?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI France ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI France ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI France ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI France ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- EWQiShares MSCI France ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or GMF?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or GMF?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or GMF More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.889, which suggesting that the stock is 11.099% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a beta of 0.798, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.153%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or GMF?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.58 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or GMF?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
2 Ultra Safe Dividend Stocks to Buy Now
Historically, blue-chip dividend stocks have been good choices for periods…
Where Will Asana Stock Be in 5 Years?
Asana stock hasn’t given many investors on Wall Street any…
Stock Ideas
Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Sell
31
REGN alert for May 31
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals [REGN] is down 19.04% over the past day.
Buy
55
RGC alert for May 31
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 16.13% over the past day.
Sell
42
AMBA alert for May 31
Ambarella [AMBA] is down 15.13% over the past day.
