Is ARK Next Generation Internet ETF a Good Investment?
The ARK Next Generation Internet ETF looks like a pretty…
Sell
29
GXC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$71.21
Seasonality move
:
1.47%
Day range:
$72.30 - $72.87
52-week range:
$59.45 - $97.17
Dividend yield:
2.92%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
29.1K
Avg. volume:
39.1K
1-year change:
12.18%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$72.84 | -- | -- | -- | $1.50 | 2.92% | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
$28.82 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 1.77% | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
$17.74 | -- | -- | -- | $0.41 | 2.98% | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
$22.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.51 | 2.26% | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
$25.45 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 4.83% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 1.328 | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | 1.759 | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | 1.401 | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | 1.310 | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | 1.854 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
SPDR S&P China ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or CXSE?
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or CXSE?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund0 0 0 -
Is GXC or CXSE More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.785, which suggesting that the stock is 21.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a beta of 0.856, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.373%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or CXSE?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund offers a yield of 1.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or CXSE?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or FLCH?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or FLCH?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE China ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than Franklin FTSE China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or FLCH More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.785, which suggesting that the stock is 21.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE China ETF has a beta of 0.797, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.261%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or FLCH?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Franklin FTSE China ETF offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or FLCH?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE China ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE China ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or KBA?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or KBA?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or KBA More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.785, which suggesting that the stock is 21.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a beta of 0.628, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.246%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or KBA?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF offers a yield of 2.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or KBA?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or PGJ?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or PGJ?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or PGJ More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.785, which suggesting that the stock is 21.456% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.1%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or PGJ?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.92%. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF offers a yield of 4.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or PGJ?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is Marvell Stock Up?
Semiconductor and data infrastructure company Marvell Technology (NASDAQ:MRVL) absolutely trounced…
Why Is General Electric Stock Going Up?
General Electric Company, doing business these days as GE Aerospace…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
44
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
1
IONQ alert for Jan 10
IonQ [IONQ] is up 12% over the past day.
Sell
45
COLL alert for Jan 10
Collegium Pharmaceutical [COLL] is down 1.41% over the past day.
Sell
30
EDN alert for Jan 10
Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA [EDN] is down 0.75% over the past day.
