Where Will AST SpaceMobile Be In 5 Years?
Ever tried to send a text from the Nevada desert…
Buy
63
GMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$125.59
Seasonality move
:
0.57%
Day range:
$123.59 - $124.38
52-week range:
$100.11 - $130.43
Dividend yield:
1.79%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
7.5K
Avg. volume:
16.8K
1-year change:
10.58%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GMF
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GMF
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
|
$123.77 | -- | -- | -- | $1.58 | 1.79% | -- |
|
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF
|
$36.59 | -- | -- | -- | $0.34 | 1.58% | -- |
|
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
|
$45.49 | -- | -- | -- | $0.66 | 0% | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
$42.83 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 2.77% | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$86.88 | -- | -- | -- | $1.50 | 2.45% | -- |
|
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
|
$42.01 | -- | -- | -- | $0.62 | 2.54% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GMF
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
|
-- | 0.516 | -- | -- |
|
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF
|
-- | 0.485 | -- | -- |
|
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
|
-- | 1.580 | -- | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
-- | 1.249 | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 0.728 | -- | -- |
|
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
|
-- | 0.567 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GMF
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GMF or DBAW?
Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- DBAWXtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GMF or DBAW?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF0 0 0 DBAWXtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF0 0 0 -
Is GMF or DBAW More Risky?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.672% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF has a beta of 0.699, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.058%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMF or DBAW?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMF or DBAW?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- -- DBAWXtrackers MSCI All Wld x US Hdg Eqty ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GMF or EWD?
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Sweden ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- EWDiShares MSCI Sweden ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GMF or EWD?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Sweden ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Sweden ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Sweden ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF0 0 0 EWDiShares MSCI Sweden ETF0 0 0 -
Is GMF or EWD More Risky?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.672% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Sweden ETF has a beta of 1.340, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.958%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMF or EWD?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. iShares MSCI Sweden ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Sweden ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMF or EWD?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Sweden ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Sweden ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Sweden ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Sweden ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- -- EWDiShares MSCI Sweden ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GMF or EWQ?
iShares MSCI France ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI France ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- EWQiShares MSCI France ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GMF or EWQ?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI France ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI France ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI France ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF0 0 0 EWQiShares MSCI France ETF0 0 0 -
Is GMF or EWQ More Risky?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.672% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI France ETF has a beta of 1.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.723%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMF or EWQ?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. iShares MSCI France ETF offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI France ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMF or EWQ?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI France ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI France ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI France ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI France ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- -- EWQiShares MSCI France ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GMF or GXC?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GMF or GXC?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P China ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF0 0 0 GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 -
Is GMF or GXC More Risky?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.672% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.885, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.477%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMF or GXC?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. SPDR S&P China ETF offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMF or GXC?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GMF or SPEM?
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- SPEMSPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GMF or SPEM?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is more attractive than SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF0 0 0 SPEMSPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF0 0 0 -
Is GMF or SPEM More Risky?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.672% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF has a beta of 0.830, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.013%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMF or SPEM?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMF or SPEM?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- -- SPEMSPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is TTD The Big Winner If Pharma Ads Are Banned?
Last week, Senators Bernie Sanders and Angus King introduced a…
Is Palantir Stock Overvalued?
By every traditional yardstick, including a price‑to‑sales well above 100,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 48x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Alerts
Sell
11
VEON alert for Jun 16
VEON [VEON] is up 4.61% over the past day.
Buy
74
DAVE alert for Jun 16
Dave [DAVE] is up 3.92% over the past day.
Buy
54
DAR alert for Jun 16
Darling Ingredients [DAR] is up 7.19% over the past day.
