YUMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chipotle Mexican Grill has a net margin of 9.67% compared to Yum China Holdings's net margin of 13.87%. Yum China Holdings's return on equity of 13.07% beat Chipotle Mexican Grill's return on equity of 44.62%.

Yum China Holdings has a consensus price target of $57.82, signalling upside risk potential of 29.49%. On the other hand Chipotle Mexican Grill has an analysts' consensus of $65.90 which suggests that it could grow by 14.4%. Given that Yum China Holdings has higher upside potential than Chipotle Mexican Grill, analysts believe Yum China Holdings is more attractive than Chipotle Mexican Grill.

Yum China Holdings has a beta of 0.347, which suggesting that the stock is 65.316% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 1.272, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.193%.

Yum China Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Chipotle Mexican Grill offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Yum China Holdings pays 26.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Chipotle Mexican Grill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Yum China Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Chipotle Mexican Grill quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Yum China Holdings's net income of $297M is lower than Chipotle Mexican Grill's net income of $387.4M. Notably, Yum China Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.76x while Chipotle Mexican Grill's PE ratio is 53.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yum China Holdings is 1.59x versus 7.22x for Chipotle Mexican Grill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 9.67% compared to Yum China Holdings's net margin of 3.38%. Yum China Holdings's return on equity of 13.07% beat Brinker International's return on equity of --.

Yum China Holdings has a consensus price target of $57.82, signalling upside risk potential of 29.49%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $131.00 which suggests that it could fall by -9.1%. Given that Yum China Holdings has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Yum China Holdings is more attractive than Brinker International.

Yum China Holdings has a beta of 0.347, which suggesting that the stock is 65.316% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.523, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.255%.

Yum China Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Yum China Holdings pays 26.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Yum China Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Yum China Holdings's net income of $297M is higher than Brinker International's net income of $38.5M. Notably, Yum China Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.76x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 35.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yum China Holdings is 1.59x versus 1.45x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a net margin of 9.67% compared to Yum China Holdings's net margin of 5.14%. Yum China Holdings's return on equity of 13.07% beat El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 9.49%.

Yum China Holdings has a consensus price target of $57.82, signalling upside risk potential of 29.49%. On the other hand El Pollo Loco Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.27%. Given that Yum China Holdings has higher upside potential than El Pollo Loco Holdings, analysts believe Yum China Holdings is more attractive than El Pollo Loco Holdings.

Yum China Holdings has a beta of 0.347, which suggesting that the stock is 65.316% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.76%.

Yum China Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. El Pollo Loco Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Yum China Holdings pays 26.12% of its earnings as a dividend. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yum China Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Yum China Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues of $120.4M. Yum China Holdings's net income of $297M is higher than El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $6.2M. Notably, Yum China Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.76x while El Pollo Loco Holdings's PE ratio is 14.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yum China Holdings is 1.59x versus 0.75x for El Pollo Loco Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 9.67% compared to Yum China Holdings's net margin of 20.92%. Yum China Holdings's return on equity of 13.07% beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Yum China Holdings has a consensus price target of $57.82, signalling upside risk potential of 29.49%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $143.91 which suggests that it could grow by 14.83%. Given that Yum China Holdings has higher upside potential than Yum Brands, analysts believe Yum China Holdings is more attractive than Yum Brands.

Yum China Holdings has a beta of 0.347, which suggesting that the stock is 65.316% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 1.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.554%.

Yum China Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Yum China Holdings pays 26.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 42.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Yum China Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Yum China Holdings's net income of $297M is lower than Yum Brands's net income of $382M. Notably, Yum China Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.76x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 23.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Yum China Holdings is 1.59x versus 4.94x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.