MCD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jack In The Box has a net margin of 32.81% compared to McDonald's's net margin of 6.28%. McDonald's's return on equity of -- beat Jack In The Box's return on equity of --.

McDonald's has a consensus price target of $295.51, signalling upside risk potential of 9.5%. On the other hand Jack In The Box has an analysts' consensus of $63.25 which suggests that it could grow by 26.05%. Given that Jack In The Box has higher upside potential than McDonald's, analysts believe Jack In The Box is more attractive than McDonald's.

McDonald's has a beta of 0.734, which suggesting that the stock is 26.598% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jack In The Box has a beta of 1.923, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.305%.

McDonald's has a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.31%. Jack In The Box offers a yield of 4.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. McDonald's pays 53.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Jack In The Box pays out -92.58% of its earnings as a dividend. McDonald's's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McDonald's quarterly revenues are $6.9B, which are larger than Jack In The Box quarterly revenues of $349.3M. McDonald's's net income of $2.3B is higher than Jack In The Box's net income of $21.9M. Notably, McDonald's's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.78x while Jack In The Box's PE ratio is 11.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McDonald's is 8.19x versus 0.57x for Jack In The Box. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Starbucks has a net margin of 32.81% compared to McDonald's's net margin of 10.02%. McDonald's's return on equity of -- beat Starbucks's return on equity of --.

McDonald's has a consensus price target of $295.51, signalling upside risk potential of 9.5%. On the other hand Starbucks has an analysts' consensus of $103.30 which suggests that it could grow by 11.98%. Given that Starbucks has higher upside potential than McDonald's, analysts believe Starbucks is more attractive than McDonald's.

McDonald's has a beta of 0.734, which suggesting that the stock is 26.598% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starbucks has a beta of 0.971, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.863%.

McDonald's has a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.31%. Starbucks offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. McDonald's pays 53.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks pays out 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McDonald's quarterly revenues are $6.9B, which are smaller than Starbucks quarterly revenues of $9.1B. McDonald's's net income of $2.3B is higher than Starbucks's net income of $909.2M. Notably, McDonald's's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.78x while Starbucks's PE ratio is 27.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McDonald's is 8.19x versus 2.90x for Starbucks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shake Shack has a net margin of 32.81% compared to McDonald's's net margin of -3.22%. McDonald's's return on equity of -- beat Shake Shack's return on equity of 1.86%.

McDonald's has a consensus price target of $295.51, signalling upside risk potential of 9.5%. On the other hand Shake Shack has an analysts' consensus of $131.86 which suggests that it could fall by -0.52%. Given that McDonald's has higher upside potential than Shake Shack, analysts believe McDonald's is more attractive than Shake Shack.

McDonald's has a beta of 0.734, which suggesting that the stock is 26.598% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shake Shack has a beta of 1.853, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.301%.

McDonald's has a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.31%. Shake Shack offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. McDonald's pays 53.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Shake Shack pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. McDonald's's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McDonald's quarterly revenues are $6.9B, which are larger than Shake Shack quarterly revenues of $316.9M. McDonald's's net income of $2.3B is higher than Shake Shack's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, McDonald's's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.78x while Shake Shack's PE ratio is 779.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McDonald's is 8.19x versus 4.56x for Shake Shack. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 32.81% compared to McDonald's's net margin of 20.92%. McDonald's's return on equity of -- beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

McDonald's has a consensus price target of $295.51, signalling upside risk potential of 9.5%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $145.81 which suggests that it could grow by 6.39%. Given that McDonald's has higher upside potential than Yum Brands, analysts believe McDonald's is more attractive than Yum Brands.

McDonald's has a beta of 0.734, which suggesting that the stock is 26.598% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.305%.

McDonald's has a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.31%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. McDonald's pays 53.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 42.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McDonald's quarterly revenues are $6.9B, which are larger than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $1.8B. McDonald's's net income of $2.3B is higher than Yum Brands's net income of $382M. Notably, McDonald's's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.78x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 25.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McDonald's is 8.19x versus 5.33x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.