UMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AUO has a net margin of 13.44% compared to United Microelectronics's net margin of 4.57%. United Microelectronics's return on equity of 12.42% beat AUO's return on equity of 2.35%.

United Microelectronics has a consensus price target of $7.17, signalling downside risk potential of -13.86%. On the other hand AUO has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.53%. Given that AUO has higher upside potential than United Microelectronics, analysts believe AUO is more attractive than United Microelectronics.

United Microelectronics has a beta of 1.127, which suggesting that the stock is 12.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AUO has a beta of 0.576, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.412%.

United Microelectronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.48%. AUO offers a yield of 5.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. United Microelectronics pays 77.05% of its earnings as a dividend. AUO pays out -225.22% of its earnings as a dividend. United Microelectronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Microelectronics quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than AUO quarterly revenues of $2.2B. United Microelectronics's net income of $236.4M is higher than AUO's net income of $100.1M. Notably, United Microelectronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.46x while AUO's PE ratio is 36.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Microelectronics is 2.83x versus 0.46x for AUO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Foxconn Technology has a net margin of 13.44% compared to United Microelectronics's net margin of 3.18%. United Microelectronics's return on equity of 12.42% beat Foxconn Technology's return on equity of 3.39%.

United Microelectronics has a consensus price target of $7.17, signalling downside risk potential of -13.86%. On the other hand Foxconn Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that United Microelectronics has higher upside potential than Foxconn Technology, analysts believe United Microelectronics is more attractive than Foxconn Technology.

United Microelectronics has a beta of 1.127, which suggesting that the stock is 12.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foxconn Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

United Microelectronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.48%. Foxconn Technology offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. United Microelectronics pays 77.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Foxconn Technology pays out 59.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Microelectronics quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Foxconn Technology quarterly revenues of $911.9M. United Microelectronics's net income of $236.4M is higher than Foxconn Technology's net income of $29M. Notably, United Microelectronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.46x while Foxconn Technology's PE ratio is 22.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Microelectronics is 2.83x versus 0.84x for Foxconn Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a net margin of 13.44% compared to United Microelectronics's net margin of 13.25%. United Microelectronics's return on equity of 12.42% beat GLOBALFOUNDRIES's return on equity of -1.68%.

United Microelectronics has a consensus price target of $7.17, signalling downside risk potential of -13.86%. On the other hand GLOBALFOUNDRIES has an analysts' consensus of $43.39 which suggests that it could grow by 18.57%. Given that GLOBALFOUNDRIES has higher upside potential than United Microelectronics, analysts believe GLOBALFOUNDRIES is more attractive than United Microelectronics.

United Microelectronics has a beta of 1.127, which suggesting that the stock is 12.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

United Microelectronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.48%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United Microelectronics pays 77.05% of its earnings as a dividend. GLOBALFOUNDRIES pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. United Microelectronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Microelectronics quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than GLOBALFOUNDRIES quarterly revenues of $1.6B. United Microelectronics's net income of $236.4M is higher than GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net income of $210M. Notably, United Microelectronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.46x while GLOBALFOUNDRIES's PE ratio is 29.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Microelectronics is 2.83x versus 2.99x for GLOBALFOUNDRIES. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has a net margin of 13.44% compared to United Microelectronics's net margin of 42.98%. United Microelectronics's return on equity of 12.42% beat Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's return on equity of 32.1%.

United Microelectronics has a consensus price target of $7.17, signalling downside risk potential of -13.86%. On the other hand Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of $224.36 which suggests that it could grow by 4.02%. Given that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has higher upside potential than United Microelectronics, analysts believe Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing is more attractive than United Microelectronics.

United Microelectronics has a beta of 1.127, which suggesting that the stock is 12.671% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has a beta of 1.265, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.502%.

United Microelectronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.48%. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. United Microelectronics pays 77.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing pays out 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Microelectronics quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $25.5B. United Microelectronics's net income of $236.4M is lower than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's net income of $11B. Notably, United Microelectronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.46x while Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's PE ratio is 27.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Microelectronics is 2.83x versus 11.56x for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.