GFS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of -39.89% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net margin of 6.29%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's return on equity of -2.36% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 2.9%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a consensus price target of $45.76, signalling upside risk potential of 29.66%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $135.64 which suggests that it could grow by 40.35%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than GLOBALFOUNDRIES.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.887, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.664%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.7B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net income of -$730M is lower than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $482M. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 97.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES is 2.90x versus 6.13x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of -39.89% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net margin of -6.48%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's return on equity of -2.36% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a consensus price target of $45.76, signalling upside risk potential of 29.66%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.85 which suggests that it could grow by 8.98%. Given that GLOBALFOUNDRIES has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe GLOBALFOUNDRIES is more attractive than Intel.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.94%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net income of -$730M is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES is 2.90x versus 1.63x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lattice Semiconductor has a net margin of -39.89% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net margin of 14.06%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's return on equity of -2.36% beat Lattice Semiconductor's return on equity of 8.76%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a consensus price target of $45.76, signalling upside risk potential of 29.66%. On the other hand Lattice Semiconductor has an analysts' consensus of $64.74 which suggests that it could grow by 32.01%. Given that Lattice Semiconductor has higher upside potential than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, analysts believe Lattice Semiconductor is more attractive than GLOBALFOUNDRIES.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lattice Semiconductor has a beta of 1.636, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.603%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lattice Semiconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lattice Semiconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Lattice Semiconductor quarterly revenues of $117.4M. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net income of -$730M is lower than Lattice Semiconductor's net income of $16.5M. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while Lattice Semiconductor's PE ratio is 111.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES is 2.90x versus 13.32x for Lattice Semiconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of -39.89% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net margin of 11.02%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's return on equity of -2.36% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a consensus price target of $45.76, signalling upside risk potential of 29.66%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $103.36 which suggests that it could grow by 75.42%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than GLOBALFOUNDRIES.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.781, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.133%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net income of -$730M is lower than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES is 2.90x versus 8.84x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.