UE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Getty Realty has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Urban Edge Properties's net margin of 29.8%. Urban Edge Properties's return on equity of 21.77% beat Getty Realty's return on equity of 6.88%.

Urban Edge Properties has a consensus price target of $23.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.42%. On the other hand Getty Realty has an analysts' consensus of $34.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.06%. Given that Urban Edge Properties has higher upside potential than Getty Realty, analysts believe Urban Edge Properties is more attractive than Getty Realty.

Urban Edge Properties has a beta of 1.553, which suggesting that the stock is 55.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Getty Realty has a beta of 0.931, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.891%.

Urban Edge Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.43%. Getty Realty offers a yield of 6.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Urban Edge Properties pays 30.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Getty Realty pays out 144.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Edge Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Getty Realty's is not.

Urban Edge Properties quarterly revenues are $112.4M, which are larger than Getty Realty quarterly revenues of $51.5M. Urban Edge Properties's net income of $9.1M is lower than Getty Realty's net income of $15.3M. Notably, Urban Edge Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.88x while Getty Realty's PE ratio is 25.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban Edge Properties is 5.37x versus 8.11x for Getty Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimco Realty has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Urban Edge Properties's net margin of 26.79%. Urban Edge Properties's return on equity of 21.77% beat Kimco Realty's return on equity of 3.69%.

Urban Edge Properties has a consensus price target of $23.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.42%. On the other hand Kimco Realty has an analysts' consensus of $25.95 which suggests that it could grow by 17.58%. Given that Kimco Realty has higher upside potential than Urban Edge Properties, analysts believe Kimco Realty is more attractive than Urban Edge Properties.

Urban Edge Properties has a beta of 1.553, which suggesting that the stock is 55.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimco Realty has a beta of 1.524, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.408%.

Urban Edge Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.43%. Kimco Realty offers a yield of 4.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Urban Edge Properties pays 30.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimco Realty pays out 100.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Edge Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kimco Realty's is not.

Urban Edge Properties quarterly revenues are $112.4M, which are smaller than Kimco Realty quarterly revenues of $507.6M. Urban Edge Properties's net income of $9.1M is lower than Kimco Realty's net income of $136M. Notably, Urban Edge Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.88x while Kimco Realty's PE ratio is 40.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban Edge Properties is 5.37x versus 7.39x for Kimco Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NewLake Capital Partners has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Urban Edge Properties's net margin of 51.16%. Urban Edge Properties's return on equity of 21.77% beat NewLake Capital Partners's return on equity of 6.59%.

Urban Edge Properties has a consensus price target of $23.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.42%. On the other hand NewLake Capital Partners has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 44.75%. Given that NewLake Capital Partners has higher upside potential than Urban Edge Properties, analysts believe NewLake Capital Partners is more attractive than Urban Edge Properties.

Urban Edge Properties has a beta of 1.553, which suggesting that the stock is 55.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NewLake Capital Partners has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Urban Edge Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.43%. NewLake Capital Partners offers a yield of 10.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Urban Edge Properties pays 30.26% of its earnings as a dividend. NewLake Capital Partners pays out 134.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Edge Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but NewLake Capital Partners's is not.

Urban Edge Properties quarterly revenues are $112.4M, which are larger than NewLake Capital Partners quarterly revenues of $12.6M. Urban Edge Properties's net income of $9.1M is higher than NewLake Capital Partners's net income of $6.4M. Notably, Urban Edge Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.88x while NewLake Capital Partners's PE ratio is 12.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban Edge Properties is 5.37x versus 6.73x for NewLake Capital Partners. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a net margin of 8.08% compared to Urban Edge Properties's net margin of 3.2%. Urban Edge Properties's return on equity of 21.77% beat Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 6.55%.

Urban Edge Properties has a consensus price target of $23.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.42%. On the other hand Strawberry Fields REIT has an analysts' consensus of $13.33 which suggests that it could grow by 20.66%. Given that Strawberry Fields REIT has higher upside potential than Urban Edge Properties, analysts believe Strawberry Fields REIT is more attractive than Urban Edge Properties.

Urban Edge Properties has a beta of 1.553, which suggesting that the stock is 55.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Urban Edge Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.43%. Strawberry Fields REIT offers a yield of 4.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Urban Edge Properties pays 30.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT pays out 115.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Urban Edge Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Strawberry Fields REIT's is not.

Urban Edge Properties quarterly revenues are $112.4M, which are larger than Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues of $29.5M. Urban Edge Properties's net income of $9.1M is higher than Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $944K. Notably, Urban Edge Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.88x while Strawberry Fields REIT's PE ratio is 21.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban Edge Properties is 5.37x versus 0.65x for Strawberry Fields REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.