TKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Omega Flex has a net margin of 6.87% compared to The Timken's net margin of 15.29%. The Timken's return on equity of 11.03% beat Omega Flex's return on equity of 21.23%.

The Timken has a consensus price target of $76.65, signalling upside risk potential of 7.01%. On the other hand Omega Flex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Timken has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe The Timken is more attractive than Omega Flex.

The Timken has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex has a beta of 0.363, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.731%.

The Timken has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Omega Flex offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. The Timken pays 27.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Omega Flex quarterly revenues of $23.3M. The Timken's net income of $78.3M is higher than Omega Flex's net income of $3.6M. Notably, The Timken's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.44x while Omega Flex's PE ratio is 19.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken is 1.12x versus 3.46x for Omega Flex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RBC Bearings has a net margin of 6.87% compared to The Timken's net margin of 16.61%. The Timken's return on equity of 11.03% beat RBC Bearings's return on equity of 8.54%.

The Timken has a consensus price target of $76.65, signalling upside risk potential of 7.01%. On the other hand RBC Bearings has an analysts' consensus of $402.50 which suggests that it could grow by 10.23%. Given that RBC Bearings has higher upside potential than The Timken, analysts believe RBC Bearings is more attractive than The Timken.

The Timken has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Bearings has a beta of 1.660, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.959%.

The Timken has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. RBC Bearings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Timken pays 27.25% of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings pays out 6.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than RBC Bearings quarterly revenues of $437.7M. The Timken's net income of $78.3M is higher than RBC Bearings's net income of $72.7M. Notably, The Timken's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.44x while RBC Bearings's PE ratio is 48.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken is 1.12x versus 6.85x for RBC Bearings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rockwell Automation has a net margin of 6.87% compared to The Timken's net margin of 12.59%. The Timken's return on equity of 11.03% beat Rockwell Automation's return on equity of 25.11%.

The Timken has a consensus price target of $76.65, signalling upside risk potential of 7.01%. On the other hand Rockwell Automation has an analysts' consensus of $317.12 which suggests that it could fall by -2.22%. Given that The Timken has higher upside potential than Rockwell Automation, analysts believe The Timken is more attractive than Rockwell Automation.

The Timken has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.378, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.802%.

The Timken has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Rockwell Automation offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share. The Timken pays 27.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Rockwell Automation pays out 59.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Rockwell Automation quarterly revenues of $2B. The Timken's net income of $78.3M is lower than Rockwell Automation's net income of $252M. Notably, The Timken's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.44x while Rockwell Automation's PE ratio is 40.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken is 1.12x versus 4.63x for Rockwell Automation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a net margin of 6.87% compared to The Timken's net margin of 1.44%. The Timken's return on equity of 11.03% beat Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 7.9%.

The Timken has a consensus price target of $76.65, signalling upside risk potential of 7.01%. On the other hand Smith & Wesson Brands has an analysts' consensus of $13.83 which suggests that it could grow by 29.4%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than The Timken, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than The Timken.

The Timken has a beta of 1.278, which suggesting that the stock is 27.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.562%.

The Timken has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.91%. Smith & Wesson Brands offers a yield of 4.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. The Timken pays 27.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands pays out 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues of $115.9M. The Timken's net income of $78.3M is higher than Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $1.7M. Notably, The Timken's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.44x while Smith & Wesson Brands's PE ratio is 16.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken is 1.12x versus 0.98x for Smith & Wesson Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.