TKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 7.26% compared to The Timken's net margin of -82.25%. The Timken's return on equity of 12.09% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.

The Timken has a consensus price target of $89.64, signalling upside risk potential of 24.79%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9905767.09%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than The Timken, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than The Timken.

The Timken has a beta of 1.386, which suggesting that the stock is 38.562% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 247.194%.

The Timken has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Timken pays 23.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -0.6% of its earnings as a dividend. The Timken's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. The Timken's net income of $81.8M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, The Timken's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.93x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken is 1.11x versus 0.03x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 7.26% compared to The Timken's net margin of 18.56%. The Timken's return on equity of 12.09% beat Omega Flex's return on equity of 22.86%.

The Timken has a consensus price target of $89.64, signalling upside risk potential of 24.79%. On the other hand Omega Flex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Timken has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe The Timken is more attractive than Omega Flex.

The Timken has a beta of 1.386, which suggesting that the stock is 38.562% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex has a beta of 0.375, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.492%.

The Timken has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Omega Flex offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. The Timken pays 23.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 63.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Omega Flex quarterly revenues of $24.9M. The Timken's net income of $81.8M is higher than Omega Flex's net income of $4.6M. Notably, The Timken's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.93x while Omega Flex's PE ratio is 23.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken is 1.11x versus 4.18x for Omega Flex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RBC Bearings has a net margin of 7.26% compared to The Timken's net margin of 13.62%. The Timken's return on equity of 12.09% beat RBC Bearings's return on equity of 8.13%.

The Timken has a consensus price target of $89.64, signalling upside risk potential of 24.79%. On the other hand RBC Bearings has an analysts' consensus of $338.20 which suggests that it could grow by 11.02%. Given that The Timken has higher upside potential than RBC Bearings, analysts believe The Timken is more attractive than RBC Bearings.

The Timken has a beta of 1.386, which suggesting that the stock is 38.562% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Bearings has a beta of 1.548, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.815%.

The Timken has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. RBC Bearings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Timken pays 23.85% of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings pays out 10.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than RBC Bearings quarterly revenues of $397.9M. The Timken's net income of $81.8M is higher than RBC Bearings's net income of $54.2M. Notably, The Timken's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.93x while RBC Bearings's PE ratio is 44.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken is 1.11x versus 5.60x for RBC Bearings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a net margin of 7.26% compared to The Timken's net margin of 3.19%. The Timken's return on equity of 12.09% beat Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 9.5%.

The Timken has a consensus price target of $89.64, signalling upside risk potential of 24.79%. On the other hand Smith & Wesson Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 53.8%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than The Timken, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than The Timken.

The Timken has a beta of 1.386, which suggesting that the stock is 38.562% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 0.974, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.632%.

The Timken has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Smith & Wesson Brands offers a yield of 5.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. The Timken pays 23.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands pays out 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues of $129.7M. The Timken's net income of $81.8M is higher than Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $4.1M. Notably, The Timken's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.93x while Smith & Wesson Brands's PE ratio is 12.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken is 1.11x versus 0.88x for Smith & Wesson Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.