TKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Omega Flex has a net margin of 6.87% compared to The Timken's net margin of 15.29%. The Timken's return on equity of 11.03% beat Omega Flex's return on equity of 21.23%.

The Timken has a consensus price target of $76.95, signalling upside risk potential of 16.12%. On the other hand Omega Flex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Timken has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe The Timken is more attractive than Omega Flex.

The Timken has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.237% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex has a beta of 0.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.472%.

The Timken has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.05%. Omega Flex offers a yield of 4.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. The Timken pays 27.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Omega Flex quarterly revenues of $23.3M. The Timken's net income of $78.3M is higher than Omega Flex's net income of $3.6M. Notably, The Timken's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.28x while Omega Flex's PE ratio is 17.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken is 1.04x versus 3.07x for Omega Flex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RBC Bearings has a net margin of 6.87% compared to The Timken's net margin of 14.68%. The Timken's return on equity of 11.03% beat RBC Bearings's return on equity of 8.35%.

The Timken has a consensus price target of $76.95, signalling upside risk potential of 16.12%. On the other hand RBC Bearings has an analysts' consensus of $384.17 which suggests that it could grow by 12.45%. Given that The Timken has higher upside potential than RBC Bearings, analysts believe The Timken is more attractive than RBC Bearings.

The Timken has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.237% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Bearings has a beta of 1.664, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.443%.

The Timken has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.05%. RBC Bearings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Timken pays 27.25% of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings pays out 10.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than RBC Bearings quarterly revenues of $394.4M. The Timken's net income of $78.3M is higher than RBC Bearings's net income of $57.9M. Notably, The Timken's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.28x while RBC Bearings's PE ratio is 46.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken is 1.04x versus 6.31x for RBC Bearings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rockwell Automation has a net margin of 6.87% compared to The Timken's net margin of 9.78%. The Timken's return on equity of 11.03% beat Rockwell Automation's return on equity of 25.25%.

The Timken has a consensus price target of $76.95, signalling upside risk potential of 16.12%. On the other hand Rockwell Automation has an analysts' consensus of $278.97 which suggests that it could grow by 10.24%. Given that The Timken has higher upside potential than Rockwell Automation, analysts believe The Timken is more attractive than Rockwell Automation.

The Timken has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.237% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.413%.

The Timken has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.05%. Rockwell Automation offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share. The Timken pays 27.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Rockwell Automation pays out 59.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Rockwell Automation quarterly revenues of $1.9B. The Timken's net income of $78.3M is lower than Rockwell Automation's net income of $184M. Notably, The Timken's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.28x while Rockwell Automation's PE ratio is 31.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken is 1.04x versus 3.57x for Rockwell Automation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a net margin of 6.87% compared to The Timken's net margin of 1.44%. The Timken's return on equity of 11.03% beat Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 7.9%.

The Timken has a consensus price target of $76.95, signalling upside risk potential of 16.12%. On the other hand Smith & Wesson Brands has an analysts' consensus of $13.83 which suggests that it could grow by 51.18%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than The Timken, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than The Timken.

The Timken has a beta of 1.302, which suggesting that the stock is 30.237% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.526%.

The Timken has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.05%. Smith & Wesson Brands offers a yield of 5.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. The Timken pays 27.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands pays out 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Timken quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues of $115.9M. The Timken's net income of $78.3M is higher than Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $1.7M. Notably, The Timken's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.28x while Smith & Wesson Brands's PE ratio is 14.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Timken is 1.04x versus 0.84x for Smith & Wesson Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.