SKLZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electronic Arts has a net margin of -85.96% compared to Skillz's net margin of 14.52%. Skillz's return on equity of -17.96% beat Electronic Arts's return on equity of 13.97%.

Skillz has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 57.46%. On the other hand Electronic Arts has an analysts' consensus of $162.13 which suggests that it could grow by 12.07%. Given that Skillz has higher upside potential than Electronic Arts, analysts believe Skillz is more attractive than Electronic Arts.

Skillz has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.805, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.512%.

Skillz has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Electronic Arts offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Skillz pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts pays out 16.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Skillz quarterly revenues are $24.6M, which are smaller than Electronic Arts quarterly revenues of $2B. Skillz's net income of -$21.1M is lower than Electronic Arts's net income of $294M. Notably, Skillz's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Electronic Arts's PE ratio is 37.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skillz is 0.98x versus 5.26x for Electronic Arts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golden Matrix Group has a net margin of -85.96% compared to Skillz's net margin of -8.31%. Skillz's return on equity of -17.96% beat Golden Matrix Group's return on equity of -4.41%.

Skillz has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 57.46%. On the other hand Golden Matrix Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 94.18%. Given that Golden Matrix Group has higher upside potential than Skillz, analysts believe Golden Matrix Group is more attractive than Skillz.

Skillz has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Matrix Group has a beta of 1.942, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.197%.

Skillz has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Golden Matrix Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skillz pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Matrix Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Skillz quarterly revenues are $24.6M, which are smaller than Golden Matrix Group quarterly revenues of $41M. Skillz's net income of -$21.1M is lower than Golden Matrix Group's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Skillz's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Golden Matrix Group's PE ratio is 849.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skillz is 0.98x versus 1.61x for Golden Matrix Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Roblox has a net margin of -85.96% compared to Skillz's net margin of -26.04%. Skillz's return on equity of -17.96% beat Roblox's return on equity of -960.86%.

Skillz has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 57.46%. On the other hand Roblox has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -9.13%. Given that Skillz has higher upside potential than Roblox, analysts believe Skillz is more attractive than Roblox.

Skillz has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roblox has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Skillz has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Roblox offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skillz pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Roblox pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Skillz quarterly revenues are $24.6M, which are smaller than Roblox quarterly revenues of $919M. Skillz's net income of -$21.1M is higher than Roblox's net income of -$239.3M. Notably, Skillz's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Roblox's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skillz is 0.98x versus 11.64x for Roblox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Take-Two Interactive Software has a net margin of -85.96% compared to Skillz's net margin of -27.01%. Skillz's return on equity of -17.96% beat Take-Two Interactive Software's return on equity of -52.65%.

Skillz has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 57.46%. On the other hand Take-Two Interactive Software has an analysts' consensus of $196.07 which suggests that it could grow by 7.88%. Given that Skillz has higher upside potential than Take-Two Interactive Software, analysts believe Skillz is more attractive than Take-Two Interactive Software.

Skillz has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Take-Two Interactive Software has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.25%.

Skillz has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Take-Two Interactive Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skillz pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Take-Two Interactive Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Skillz quarterly revenues are $24.6M, which are smaller than Take-Two Interactive Software quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Skillz's net income of -$21.1M is higher than Take-Two Interactive Software's net income of -$365.5M. Notably, Skillz's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Take-Two Interactive Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skillz is 0.98x versus 5.73x for Take-Two Interactive Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.