GMGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electronic Arts has a net margin of -0.54% compared to Golden Matrix Group's net margin of 13.4%. Golden Matrix Group's return on equity of -6.44% beat Electronic Arts's return on equity of 15.52%.

Golden Matrix Group has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling upside risk potential of 88.17%. On the other hand Electronic Arts has an analysts' consensus of $166.80 which suggests that it could grow by 16.01%. Given that Golden Matrix Group has higher upside potential than Electronic Arts, analysts believe Golden Matrix Group is more attractive than Electronic Arts.

Golden Matrix Group has a beta of 1.562, which suggesting that the stock is 56.166% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.471%.

Golden Matrix Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Electronic Arts offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Golden Matrix Group pays -51.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts pays out 17.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Golden Matrix Group quarterly revenues are $42.7M, which are smaller than Electronic Arts quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Golden Matrix Group's net income of -$231.6K is lower than Electronic Arts's net income of $254M. Notably, Golden Matrix Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 845.01x while Electronic Arts's PE ratio is 33.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Matrix Group is 1.40x versus 5.09x for Electronic Arts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GameSquare Holdings has a net margin of -0.54% compared to Golden Matrix Group's net margin of -24.42%. Golden Matrix Group's return on equity of -6.44% beat GameSquare Holdings's return on equity of -169.08%.

Golden Matrix Group has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling upside risk potential of 88.17%. On the other hand GameSquare Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 223.83%. Given that GameSquare Holdings has higher upside potential than Golden Matrix Group, analysts believe GameSquare Holdings is more attractive than Golden Matrix Group.

Golden Matrix Group has a beta of 1.562, which suggesting that the stock is 56.166% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GameSquare Holdings has a beta of 1.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.658%.

Golden Matrix Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GameSquare Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Matrix Group pays -51.99% of its earnings as a dividend. GameSquare Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Golden Matrix Group quarterly revenues are $42.7M, which are larger than GameSquare Holdings quarterly revenues of $21.1M. Golden Matrix Group's net income of -$231.6K is higher than GameSquare Holdings's net income of -$5.2M. Notably, Golden Matrix Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 845.01x while GameSquare Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Matrix Group is 1.40x versus 0.30x for GameSquare Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GD Culture Group has a net margin of -0.54% compared to Golden Matrix Group's net margin of --. Golden Matrix Group's return on equity of -6.44% beat GD Culture Group's return on equity of --.

Golden Matrix Group has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling upside risk potential of 88.17%. On the other hand GD Culture Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Golden Matrix Group has higher upside potential than GD Culture Group, analysts believe Golden Matrix Group is more attractive than GD Culture Group.

Golden Matrix Group has a beta of 1.562, which suggesting that the stock is 56.166% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GD Culture Group has a beta of 1.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.358%.

Golden Matrix Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GD Culture Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Matrix Group pays -51.99% of its earnings as a dividend. GD Culture Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Golden Matrix Group quarterly revenues are $42.7M, which are larger than GD Culture Group quarterly revenues of --. Golden Matrix Group's net income of -$231.6K is higher than GD Culture Group's net income of -$977.5K. Notably, Golden Matrix Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 845.01x while GD Culture Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Matrix Group is 1.40x versus -- for GD Culture Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Take-Two Interactive Software has a net margin of -0.54% compared to Golden Matrix Group's net margin of -235.46%. Golden Matrix Group's return on equity of -6.44% beat Take-Two Interactive Software's return on equity of -88.53%.

Golden Matrix Group has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling upside risk potential of 88.17%. On the other hand Take-Two Interactive Software has an analysts' consensus of $243.05 which suggests that it could grow by 7.41%. Given that Golden Matrix Group has higher upside potential than Take-Two Interactive Software, analysts believe Golden Matrix Group is more attractive than Take-Two Interactive Software.

Golden Matrix Group has a beta of 1.562, which suggesting that the stock is 56.166% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Take-Two Interactive Software has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.367%.

Golden Matrix Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Take-Two Interactive Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Golden Matrix Group pays -51.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Take-Two Interactive Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Golden Matrix Group quarterly revenues are $42.7M, which are smaller than Take-Two Interactive Software quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Golden Matrix Group's net income of -$231.6K is higher than Take-Two Interactive Software's net income of -$3.7B. Notably, Golden Matrix Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 845.01x while Take-Two Interactive Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golden Matrix Group is 1.40x versus 7.04x for Take-Two Interactive Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.