GAME Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electronic Arts has a net margin of -24.42% compared to GameSquare Holdings's net margin of 13.4%. GameSquare Holdings's return on equity of -169.08% beat Electronic Arts's return on equity of 15.52%.

GameSquare Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 223.83%. On the other hand Electronic Arts has an analysts' consensus of $166.80 which suggests that it could grow by 16.01%. Given that GameSquare Holdings has higher upside potential than Electronic Arts, analysts believe GameSquare Holdings is more attractive than Electronic Arts.

GameSquare Holdings has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.667% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.471%.

GameSquare Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Electronic Arts offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. GameSquare Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts pays out 17.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Electronic Arts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GameSquare Holdings quarterly revenues are $21.1M, which are smaller than Electronic Arts quarterly revenues of $1.9B. GameSquare Holdings's net income of -$5.2M is lower than Electronic Arts's net income of $254M. Notably, GameSquare Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Electronic Arts's PE ratio is 33.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GameSquare Holdings is 0.30x versus 5.09x for Electronic Arts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golden Matrix Group has a net margin of -24.42% compared to GameSquare Holdings's net margin of -0.54%. GameSquare Holdings's return on equity of -169.08% beat Golden Matrix Group's return on equity of -6.44%.

GameSquare Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 223.83%. On the other hand Golden Matrix Group has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could grow by 88.17%. Given that GameSquare Holdings has higher upside potential than Golden Matrix Group, analysts believe GameSquare Holdings is more attractive than Golden Matrix Group.

GameSquare Holdings has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.667% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Matrix Group has a beta of 1.562, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.166%.

GameSquare Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Golden Matrix Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GameSquare Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Matrix Group pays out -51.99% of its earnings as a dividend.

GameSquare Holdings quarterly revenues are $21.1M, which are smaller than Golden Matrix Group quarterly revenues of $42.7M. GameSquare Holdings's net income of -$5.2M is lower than Golden Matrix Group's net income of -$231.6K. Notably, GameSquare Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Golden Matrix Group's PE ratio is 845.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GameSquare Holdings is 0.30x versus 1.40x for Golden Matrix Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Roblox has a net margin of -24.42% compared to GameSquare Holdings's net margin of -20.77%. GameSquare Holdings's return on equity of -169.08% beat Roblox's return on equity of -512.91%.

GameSquare Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 223.83%. On the other hand Roblox has an analysts' consensus of $75.88 which suggests that it could fall by -12.76%. Given that GameSquare Holdings has higher upside potential than Roblox, analysts believe GameSquare Holdings is more attractive than Roblox.

GameSquare Holdings has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.667% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roblox has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GameSquare Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Roblox offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GameSquare Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Roblox pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GameSquare Holdings quarterly revenues are $21.1M, which are smaller than Roblox quarterly revenues of $1B. GameSquare Holdings's net income of -$5.2M is higher than Roblox's net income of -$215.1M. Notably, GameSquare Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Roblox's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GameSquare Holdings is 0.30x versus 14.89x for Roblox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Take-Two Interactive Software has a net margin of -24.42% compared to GameSquare Holdings's net margin of -235.46%. GameSquare Holdings's return on equity of -169.08% beat Take-Two Interactive Software's return on equity of -88.53%.

GameSquare Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 223.83%. On the other hand Take-Two Interactive Software has an analysts' consensus of $243.05 which suggests that it could grow by 7.41%. Given that GameSquare Holdings has higher upside potential than Take-Two Interactive Software, analysts believe GameSquare Holdings is more attractive than Take-Two Interactive Software.

GameSquare Holdings has a beta of 0.923, which suggesting that the stock is 7.667% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Take-Two Interactive Software has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.367%.

GameSquare Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Take-Two Interactive Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GameSquare Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Take-Two Interactive Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GameSquare Holdings quarterly revenues are $21.1M, which are smaller than Take-Two Interactive Software quarterly revenues of $1.6B. GameSquare Holdings's net income of -$5.2M is higher than Take-Two Interactive Software's net income of -$3.7B. Notably, GameSquare Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Take-Two Interactive Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GameSquare Holdings is 0.30x versus 7.04x for Take-Two Interactive Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.