RAMP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Innodata has a net margin of -3.32% compared to LiveRamp Holdings's net margin of 13.35%. LiveRamp Holdings's return on equity of -0.09% beat Innodata's return on equity of 73.59%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a consensus price target of $38.71, signalling upside risk potential of 20.61%. On the other hand Innodata has an analysts' consensus of $64.40 which suggests that it could grow by 61.2%. Given that Innodata has higher upside potential than LiveRamp Holdings, analysts believe Innodata is more attractive than LiveRamp Holdings.

LiveRamp Holdings has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.828% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innodata has a beta of 2.751, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.146%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Innodata offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LiveRamp Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innodata pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LiveRamp Holdings quarterly revenues are $188.7M, which are larger than Innodata quarterly revenues of $58.3M. LiveRamp Holdings's net income of -$6.3M is lower than Innodata's net income of $7.8M. Notably, LiveRamp Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,807.00x while Innodata's PE ratio is 38.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LiveRamp Holdings is 2.87x versus 6.31x for Innodata. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pegasystems has a net margin of -3.32% compared to LiveRamp Holdings's net margin of 17.96%. LiveRamp Holdings's return on equity of -0.09% beat Pegasystems's return on equity of 39.42%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a consensus price target of $38.71, signalling upside risk potential of 20.61%. On the other hand Pegasystems has an analysts' consensus of $101.12 which suggests that it could grow by 5.23%. Given that LiveRamp Holdings has higher upside potential than Pegasystems, analysts believe LiveRamp Holdings is more attractive than Pegasystems.

LiveRamp Holdings has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.828% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pegasystems has a beta of 1.138, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.811%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pegasystems offers a yield of 0.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. LiveRamp Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems pays out 10.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LiveRamp Holdings quarterly revenues are $188.7M, which are smaller than Pegasystems quarterly revenues of $475.6M. LiveRamp Holdings's net income of -$6.3M is lower than Pegasystems's net income of $85.4M. Notably, LiveRamp Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,807.00x while Pegasystems's PE ratio is 46.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LiveRamp Holdings is 2.87x versus 5.44x for Pegasystems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NCR Voyix has a net margin of -3.32% compared to LiveRamp Holdings's net margin of -2.76%. LiveRamp Holdings's return on equity of -0.09% beat NCR Voyix's return on equity of 183.3%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a consensus price target of $38.71, signalling upside risk potential of 20.61%. On the other hand NCR Voyix has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 29.39%. Given that NCR Voyix has higher upside potential than LiveRamp Holdings, analysts believe NCR Voyix is more attractive than LiveRamp Holdings.

LiveRamp Holdings has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.828% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NCR Voyix has a beta of 1.531, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.078%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NCR Voyix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LiveRamp Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NCR Voyix pays out 1.57% of its earnings as a dividend. NCR Voyix's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LiveRamp Holdings quarterly revenues are $188.7M, which are smaller than NCR Voyix quarterly revenues of $617M. LiveRamp Holdings's net income of -$6.3M is higher than NCR Voyix's net income of -$17M. Notably, LiveRamp Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,807.00x while NCR Voyix's PE ratio is 1.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LiveRamp Holdings is 2.87x versus 0.54x for NCR Voyix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zvelo has a net margin of -3.32% compared to LiveRamp Holdings's net margin of --. LiveRamp Holdings's return on equity of -0.09% beat Zvelo's return on equity of --.

LiveRamp Holdings has a consensus price target of $38.71, signalling upside risk potential of 20.61%. On the other hand Zvelo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LiveRamp Holdings has higher upside potential than Zvelo, analysts believe LiveRamp Holdings is more attractive than Zvelo.

LiveRamp Holdings has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.828% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zvelo has a beta of 0.130, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.987%.

LiveRamp Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zvelo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LiveRamp Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zvelo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LiveRamp Holdings quarterly revenues are $188.7M, which are larger than Zvelo quarterly revenues of --. LiveRamp Holdings's net income of -$6.3M is higher than Zvelo's net income of --. Notably, LiveRamp Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,807.00x while Zvelo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LiveRamp Holdings is 2.87x versus -- for Zvelo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.