PSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intellinetics has a net margin of 3.98% compared to Parsons's net margin of -8.56%. Parsons's return on equity of 3.39% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -4.31%.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $116.31, signalling upside risk potential of 22.14%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 47.52%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than Parsons, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than Parsons.

Parsons has a beta of 0.742, which suggesting that the stock is 25.772% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.759%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.6M. Parsons's net income of $72M is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$392.9K. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 144.29x while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 1.62x versus 3.32x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leidos Holdings has a net margin of 3.98% compared to Parsons's net margin of 8.69%. Parsons's return on equity of 3.39% beat Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 27.31%.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $116.31, signalling upside risk potential of 22.14%. On the other hand Leidos Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $184.38 which suggests that it could grow by 18.82%. Given that Parsons has higher upside potential than Leidos Holdings, analysts believe Parsons is more attractive than Leidos Holdings.

Parsons has a beta of 0.742, which suggesting that the stock is 25.772% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.658, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.246%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leidos Holdings offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings pays out 101.01% of its earnings as a dividend.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Parsons's net income of $72M is lower than Leidos Holdings's net income of $364M. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 144.29x while Leidos Holdings's PE ratio is 17.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 1.62x versus 1.31x for Leidos Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Science Applications International has a net margin of 3.98% compared to Parsons's net margin of 5.36%. Parsons's return on equity of 3.39% beat Science Applications International's return on equity of 17.6%.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $116.31, signalling upside risk potential of 22.14%. On the other hand Science Applications International has an analysts' consensus of $130.11 which suggests that it could grow by 12.29%. Given that Parsons has higher upside potential than Science Applications International, analysts believe Parsons is more attractive than Science Applications International.

Parsons has a beta of 0.742, which suggesting that the stock is 25.772% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Science Applications International has a beta of 0.665, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.458%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Science Applications International offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International pays out 16.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Science Applications International quarterly revenues of $2B. Parsons's net income of $72M is lower than Science Applications International's net income of $106M. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 144.29x while Science Applications International's PE ratio is 19.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 1.62x versus 0.81x for Science Applications International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 3.98% compared to Parsons's net margin of -1.23%. Parsons's return on equity of 3.39% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $116.31, signalling upside risk potential of 22.14%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 64.56%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Parsons, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Parsons.

Parsons has a beta of 0.742, which suggesting that the stock is 25.772% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.716, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.556%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Parsons's net income of $72M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 144.29x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 1.62x versus 0.27x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.