PSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HubSpot has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Parsons's net margin of 0.71%. Parsons's return on equity of 9.89% beat HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29%.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $88.24, signalling upside risk potential of 52.78%. On the other hand HubSpot has an analysts' consensus of $846.70 which suggests that it could grow by 45.48%. Given that Parsons has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Parsons is more attractive than HubSpot.

Parsons has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.765% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HubSpot has a beta of 1.821, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.13%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HubSpot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HubSpot pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than HubSpot quarterly revenues of $703.2M. Parsons's net income of $201.3M is higher than HubSpot's net income of $5M. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 77.91x while HubSpot's PE ratio is 6,466.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 0.99x versus 11.55x for HubSpot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intellinetics has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Parsons's net margin of -1.26%. Parsons's return on equity of 9.89% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -5.34%.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $88.24, signalling upside risk potential of 52.78%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 23.15%. Given that Parsons has higher upside potential than Intellinetics, analysts believe Parsons is more attractive than Intellinetics.

Parsons has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.765% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.332%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.3M. Parsons's net income of $201.3M is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$53.7K. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 77.91x while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 0.99x versus 3.41x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Parsons's net margin of -2893.73%. Parsons's return on equity of 9.89% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $88.24, signalling upside risk potential of 52.78%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Parsons has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe Parsons is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

Parsons has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.765% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -14.6% of its earnings as a dividend.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $55.4K. Parsons's net income of $201.3M is higher than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 77.91x while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 0.99x versus 0.40x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 11.61% compared to Parsons's net margin of -1.23%. Parsons's return on equity of 9.89% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Parsons has a consensus price target of $88.24, signalling upside risk potential of 52.78%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 95.2%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Parsons, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Parsons.

Parsons has a beta of 0.662, which suggesting that the stock is 33.765% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.832, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.194%.

Parsons has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parsons pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Parsons quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Parsons's net income of $201.3M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Parsons's price-to-earnings ratio is 77.91x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parsons is 0.99x versus 0.23x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.