HUBS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AppLovin has a net margin of 0.71% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 43.65%. HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29% beat AppLovin's return on equity of 162.55%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $750.28, signalling upside risk potential of 16.55%. On the other hand AppLovin has an analysts' consensus of $433.38 which suggests that it could grow by 42.81%. Given that AppLovin has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe AppLovin is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.785, which suggesting that the stock is 78.528% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AppLovin has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AppLovin offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AppLovin pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $703.2M, which are smaller than AppLovin quarterly revenues of $1.4B. HubSpot's net income of $5M is lower than AppLovin's net income of $599.2M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 7,152.56x while AppLovin's PE ratio is 66.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 12.77x versus 22.41x for AppLovin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fiserv has a net margin of 0.71% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 16.59%. HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29% beat Fiserv's return on equity of 11.52%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $750.28, signalling upside risk potential of 16.55%. On the other hand Fiserv has an analysts' consensus of $227.42 which suggests that it could grow by 24.83%. Given that Fiserv has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Fiserv is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.785, which suggesting that the stock is 78.528% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fiserv has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.044%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fiserv offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fiserv pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $703.2M, which are smaller than Fiserv quarterly revenues of $5.1B. HubSpot's net income of $5M is lower than Fiserv's net income of $851M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 7,152.56x while Fiserv's PE ratio is 32.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 12.77x versus 5.06x for Fiserv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Freshworks has a net margin of 0.71% compared to HubSpot's net margin of -0.66%. HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29% beat Freshworks's return on equity of -6.63%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $750.28, signalling upside risk potential of 16.55%. On the other hand Freshworks has an analysts' consensus of $19.81 which suggests that it could grow by 39.33%. Given that Freshworks has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Freshworks is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.785, which suggesting that the stock is 78.528% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freshworks has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Freshworks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Freshworks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $703.2M, which are larger than Freshworks quarterly revenues of $196.3M. HubSpot's net income of $5M is higher than Freshworks's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 7,152.56x while Freshworks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 12.77x versus 5.71x for Freshworks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of 0.71% compared to HubSpot's net margin of -8.17%. HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $750.28, signalling upside risk potential of 16.55%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $25.75 which suggests that it could grow by 96.42%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.785, which suggesting that the stock is 78.528% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $703.2M, which are larger than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $264.4M. HubSpot's net income of $5M is higher than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 7,152.56x while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 12.77x versus 2.39x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.