HUBS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fiserv has a net margin of 0.71% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 17.86%. HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29% beat Fiserv's return on equity of 10.79%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $849.73, signalling upside risk potential of 43.19%. On the other hand Fiserv has an analysts' consensus of $254.45 which suggests that it could grow by 16.09%. Given that HubSpot has higher upside potential than Fiserv, analysts believe HubSpot is more attractive than Fiserv.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.804, which suggesting that the stock is 80.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fiserv has a beta of 0.926, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.435%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fiserv offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fiserv pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $703.2M, which are smaller than Fiserv quarterly revenues of $5.3B. HubSpot's net income of $5M is lower than Fiserv's net income of $938M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,593.44x while Fiserv's PE ratio is 40.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 11.77x versus 6.24x for Fiserv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Freshworks has a net margin of 0.71% compared to HubSpot's net margin of -11.26%. HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29% beat Freshworks's return on equity of -8.61%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $849.73, signalling upside risk potential of 43.19%. On the other hand Freshworks has an analysts' consensus of $21.41 which suggests that it could grow by 41.24%. Given that HubSpot has higher upside potential than Freshworks, analysts believe HubSpot is more attractive than Freshworks.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.804, which suggesting that the stock is 80.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freshworks has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Freshworks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Freshworks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $703.2M, which are larger than Freshworks quarterly revenues of $194.6M. HubSpot's net income of $5M is higher than Freshworks's net income of -$21.9M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,593.44x while Freshworks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 11.77x versus 6.33x for Freshworks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parsons has a net margin of 0.71% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 11.61%. HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29% beat Parsons's return on equity of 9.89%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $849.73, signalling upside risk potential of 43.19%. On the other hand Parsons has an analysts' consensus of $90.46 which suggests that it could grow by 49.39%. Given that Parsons has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Parsons is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.804, which suggesting that the stock is 80.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parsons has a beta of 0.779, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.136%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Parsons offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Parsons pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $703.2M, which are smaller than Parsons quarterly revenues of $1.7B. HubSpot's net income of $5M is lower than Parsons's net income of $201.3M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,593.44x while Parsons's PE ratio is 79.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 11.77x versus 1.01x for Parsons. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twilio has a net margin of 0.71% compared to HubSpot's net margin of -1.04%. HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29% beat Twilio's return on equity of -1.24%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $849.73, signalling upside risk potential of 43.19%. On the other hand Twilio has an analysts' consensus of $142.95 which suggests that it could grow by 40.39%. Given that HubSpot has higher upside potential than Twilio, analysts believe HubSpot is more attractive than Twilio.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.804, which suggesting that the stock is 80.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twilio has a beta of 1.471, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.083%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twilio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twilio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $703.2M, which are smaller than Twilio quarterly revenues of $1.2B. HubSpot's net income of $5M is higher than Twilio's net income of -$12.5M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,593.44x while Twilio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 11.77x versus 3.79x for Twilio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.