PHIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gentex has a net margin of 3.7% compared to Phinia's net margin of 20.14%. Phinia's return on equity of 5.89% beat Gentex's return on equity of 18.42%.

Phinia has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.04%. On the other hand Gentex has an analysts' consensus of $35.02 which suggests that it could grow by 19.8%. Given that Gentex has higher upside potential than Phinia, analysts believe Gentex is more attractive than Phinia.

Phinia has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentex has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.403%.

Phinia has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.08%. Gentex offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Phinia pays 22.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Gentex pays out 26.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phinia quarterly revenues are $839M, which are larger than Gentex quarterly revenues of $608.5M. Phinia's net income of $31M is lower than Gentex's net income of $122.5M. Notably, Phinia's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.61x while Gentex's PE ratio is 15.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phinia is 0.64x versus 2.83x for Gentex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monro has a net margin of 3.7% compared to Phinia's net margin of 1.87%. Phinia's return on equity of 5.89% beat Monro's return on equity of 4.12%.

Phinia has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.04%. On the other hand Monro has an analysts' consensus of $29.75 which suggests that it could grow by 18.1%. Given that Monro has higher upside potential than Phinia, analysts believe Monro is more attractive than Phinia.

Phinia has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monro has a beta of 1.107, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.677%.

Phinia has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.08%. Monro offers a yield of 4.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Phinia pays 22.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Monro pays out 94.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phinia quarterly revenues are $839M, which are larger than Monro quarterly revenues of $301.4M. Phinia's net income of $31M is higher than Monro's net income of $5.6M. Notably, Phinia's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.61x while Monro's PE ratio is 28.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phinia is 0.64x versus 0.65x for Monro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Motorcar Parts of America has a net margin of 3.7% compared to Phinia's net margin of -1.42%. Phinia's return on equity of 5.89% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity of -23.51%.

Phinia has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.04%. On the other hand Motorcar Parts of America has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 76.1%. Given that Motorcar Parts of America has higher upside potential than Phinia, analysts believe Motorcar Parts of America is more attractive than Phinia.

Phinia has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.728%.

Phinia has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.08%. Motorcar Parts of America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phinia pays 22.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Motorcar Parts of America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Phinia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phinia quarterly revenues are $839M, which are larger than Motorcar Parts of America quarterly revenues of $208.2M. Phinia's net income of $31M is higher than Motorcar Parts of America's net income of -$3M. Notably, Phinia's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.61x while Motorcar Parts of America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phinia is 0.64x versus 0.21x for Motorcar Parts of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strattec Security has a net margin of 3.7% compared to Phinia's net margin of 2.66%. Phinia's return on equity of 5.89% beat Strattec Security's return on equity of 7.17%.

Phinia has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11.04%. On the other hand Strattec Security has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.61%. Given that Strattec Security has higher upside potential than Phinia, analysts believe Strattec Security is more attractive than Phinia.

Phinia has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strattec Security has a beta of 1.155, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.46%.

Phinia has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.08%. Strattec Security offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phinia pays 22.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Strattec Security pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Phinia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phinia quarterly revenues are $839M, which are larger than Strattec Security quarterly revenues of $139.1M. Phinia's net income of $31M is higher than Strattec Security's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Phinia's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.61x while Strattec Security's PE ratio is 10.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phinia is 0.64x versus 0.30x for Strattec Security. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.