Is Sweetgreen Stock Worth Holding For the Next Five Years?
Sweetgreen (NYSE:SG) is an up-and-coming quick service restaurant chain focused…
Sell
36
PCQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$8.72
Seasonality move
:
1.44%
Day range:
$8.85 - $9.06
52-week range:
$8.74 - $10.24
Dividend yield:
4.88%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
93.2K
Avg. volume:
71.4K
1-year change:
-4.94%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCQ
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NCA
Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCK
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCQ
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund
|
$8.85 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 4.88% | -- |
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
$11.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 6.23% | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
$9.29 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 5.28% | -- |
|
NCA
Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund
|
$8.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 4.03% | -- |
|
PCK
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II
|
$5.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 4.54% | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
$6.54 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 5.41% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCQ
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | 1.957 | -- | -- |
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
-- | 1.660 | -- | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
-- | 1.250 | -- | -- |
|
NCA
Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund
|
-- | 1.002 | -- | -- |
|
PCK
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II
|
-- | 2.314 | -- | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
-- | 2.274 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PCQ
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NCA
Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCK
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PCQ or BFZ?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a net margin of -- compared to PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net margin of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCQ or BFZ?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has higher upside potential than Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr, analysts believe PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is more attractive than Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund0 0 0 BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr0 0 0 -
Is PCQ or BFZ More Risky?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a beta of 1.293, which suggesting that the stock is 29.329% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.994%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCQ or BFZ?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.88%. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr offers a yield of 6.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCQ or BFZ?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr quarterly revenues of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's net income of --. Notably, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is -- versus -- for Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- -- BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCQ or EVM?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a net margin of -- compared to PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net margin of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCQ or EVM?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund, analysts believe PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is more attractive than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund0 0 0 EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund0 0 0 -
Is PCQ or EVM More Risky?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a beta of 1.293, which suggesting that the stock is 29.329% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a beta of 2.008, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.835%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCQ or EVM?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.88%. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund offers a yield of 5.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCQ or EVM?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund quarterly revenues of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's net income of --. Notably, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- -- EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCQ or NCA?
Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund has a net margin of -- compared to PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net margin of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- NCANuveen California Municipal Value Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCQ or NCA?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has higher upside potential than Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund, analysts believe PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is more attractive than Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund0 0 0 NCANuveen California Municipal Value Fund0 0 0 -
Is PCQ or NCA More Risky?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a beta of 1.293, which suggesting that the stock is 29.329% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund has a beta of 1.321, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.109%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCQ or NCA?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.88%. Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund offers a yield of 4.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCQ or NCA?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund quarterly revenues of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund's net income of --. Notably, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is -- versus -- for Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- -- NCANuveen California Municipal Value Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCQ or PCK?
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II has a net margin of -- compared to PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net margin of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- PCKPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCQ or PCK?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has higher upside potential than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II, analysts believe PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is more attractive than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund0 0 0 PCKPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II0 0 0 -
Is PCQ or PCK More Risky?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a beta of 1.293, which suggesting that the stock is 29.329% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II has a beta of 2.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.529%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCQ or PCK?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.88%. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II offers a yield of 4.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCQ or PCK?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II quarterly revenues of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II's net income of --. Notably, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is -- versus -- for PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- -- PCKPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund II-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PCQ or PZC?
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III has a net margin of -- compared to PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net margin of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- PZCPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PCQ or PZC?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has higher upside potential than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III, analysts believe PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is more attractive than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund0 0 0 PZCPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III0 0 0 -
Is PCQ or PZC More Risky?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a beta of 1.293, which suggesting that the stock is 29.329% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.954%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PCQ or PZC?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.88%. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III offers a yield of 5.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PCQ or PZC?
PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III quarterly revenues of --. PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III's net income of --. Notably, PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PIMCO California Municipal Income Fund is -- versus -- for PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PCQPIMCO California Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- -- PZCPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Do I Need to Know About Alcoa Stock?
Alcoa (AA) is a global leader in aluminum production. Based…
Is ROOT Stock the Next Big Thing?
Root Holdings (NASDAQ:ROOT) is the parent company of Root Insurance,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
37
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 31x
Sell
37
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Sell
31
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.3T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Alerts
Sell
25
GDXU alert for Apr 7
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 0.49% over the past day.
Buy
76
SOXS alert for Apr 7
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares [SOXS] is down 10.85% over the past day.
Sell
15
FAS alert for Apr 7
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3x Shares [FAS] is up 0.85% over the past day.
