Is Sweetgreen Stock Worth Holding For the Next Five Years?
Sweetgreen (NYSE:SG) is an up-and-coming quick service restaurant chain focused…
Sell
45
BFZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.94
Seasonality move
:
0.54%
Day range:
$11.07 - $11.25
52-week range:
$10.84 - $12.23
Dividend yield:
6.23%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
115.8K
Avg. volume:
76.7K
1-year change:
-6.09%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NCA
Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NKX
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
$11.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 6.23% | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
$9.29 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 5.28% | -- |
|
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
|
$10.77 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 5.68% | -- |
|
NCA
Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund
|
$8.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 4.03% | -- |
|
NKX
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
$12.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 6.8% | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
$6.54 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 5.41% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
-- | 1.660 | -- | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
-- | 1.250 | -- | -- |
|
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
|
-- | 2.390 | -- | -- |
|
NCA
Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund
|
-- | 1.002 | -- | -- |
|
NKX
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | 1.987 | -- | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
-- | 2.274 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BFZ
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVM
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NCA
Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NKX
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PZC
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BFZ or EVM?
Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's net margin of --. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr-- -- -- EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BFZ or EVM?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund, analysts believe Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr is more attractive than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr0 0 0 EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund0 0 0 -
Is BFZ or EVM More Risky?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a beta of 2.130, which suggesting that the stock is 112.994% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund has a beta of 2.008, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.835%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BFZ or EVM?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.23%. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund offers a yield of 5.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BFZ or EVM?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund quarterly revenues of --. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's net income of --. Notably, Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr-- -- -- -- EVMEaton Vance California Municipal Bond Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BFZ or MUC?
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's net margin of --. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's return on equity of -- beat BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr-- -- -- MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BFZ or MUC?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has higher upside potential than BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, analysts believe Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr is more attractive than BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr0 0 0 MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund0 0 0 -
Is BFZ or MUC More Risky?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a beta of 2.130, which suggesting that the stock is 112.994% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a beta of 2.332, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.162%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BFZ or MUC?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.23%. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund offers a yield of 5.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BFZ or MUC?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund quarterly revenues of --. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's net income of -- is lower than BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's net income of --. Notably, Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr is -- versus -- for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr-- -- -- -- MUCBlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BFZ or NCA?
Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's net margin of --. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's return on equity of -- beat Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr-- -- -- NCANuveen California Municipal Value Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BFZ or NCA?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has higher upside potential than Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund, analysts believe Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr is more attractive than Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr0 0 0 NCANuveen California Municipal Value Fund0 0 0 -
Is BFZ or NCA More Risky?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a beta of 2.130, which suggesting that the stock is 112.994% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund has a beta of 1.321, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.109%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BFZ or NCA?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.23%. Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund offers a yield of 4.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BFZ or NCA?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund quarterly revenues of --. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's net income of -- is lower than Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund's net income of --. Notably, Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr is -- versus -- for Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr-- -- -- -- NCANuveen California Municipal Value Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BFZ or NKX?
Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's net margin of --. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's return on equity of -- beat Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr-- -- -- NKXNuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BFZ or NKX?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has higher upside potential than Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund, analysts believe Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr is more attractive than Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr0 0 0 NKXNuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is BFZ or NKX More Risky?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a beta of 2.130, which suggesting that the stock is 112.994% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund has a beta of 2.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.607%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BFZ or NKX?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.23%. Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund offers a yield of 6.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BFZ or NKX?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's net income of -- is lower than Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr is -- versus -- for Nuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr-- -- -- -- NKXNuveen California AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BFZ or PZC?
PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III has a net margin of -- compared to Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's net margin of --. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr-- -- -- PZCPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BFZ or PZC?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has higher upside potential than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III, analysts believe Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr is more attractive than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr0 0 0 PZCPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III0 0 0 -
Is BFZ or PZC More Risky?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a beta of 2.130, which suggesting that the stock is 112.994% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.954%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BFZ or PZC?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.23%. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III offers a yield of 5.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BFZ or PZC?
Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III quarterly revenues of --. Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III's net income of --. Notably, Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blackrock CA Muni Income Tr is -- versus -- for PIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BFZBlackrock CA Muni Income Tr-- -- -- -- PZCPIMCO CA Muni Income Fund III-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Do I Need to Know About Alcoa Stock?
Alcoa (AA) is a global leader in aluminum production. Based…
Is ROOT Stock the Next Big Thing?
Root Holdings (NASDAQ:ROOT) is the parent company of Root Insurance,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
37
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 31x
Sell
37
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Sell
31
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.3T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Alerts
Sell
45
RGC alert for Apr 7
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is down 8.2% over the past day.
Sell
25
GDXU alert for Apr 7
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 1.24% over the past day.
Buy
76
SOXS alert for Apr 7
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares [SOXS] is down 6.44% over the past day.
