OXM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Document Security Systems has a net margin of -1.28% compared to Oxford Industries's net margin of --. Oxford Industries's return on equity of 2.49% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Oxford Industries has a consensus price target of $82.00, signalling upside risk potential of 48.44%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Oxford Industries has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Oxford Industries is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.610, which suggesting that the stock is 61.04% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oxford Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.85%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oxford Industries pays 68.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oxford Industries quarterly revenues are $308M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Oxford Industries's net income of -$3.9M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Oxford Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.07x while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oxford Industries is 0.57x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hanesbrands has a net margin of -1.28% compared to Oxford Industries's net margin of -1.62%. Oxford Industries's return on equity of 2.49% beat Hanesbrands's return on equity of -159.37%.

Oxford Industries has a consensus price target of $82.00, signalling upside risk potential of 48.44%. On the other hand Hanesbrands has an analysts' consensus of $7.76 which suggests that it could grow by 34.67%. Given that Oxford Industries has higher upside potential than Hanesbrands, analysts believe Oxford Industries is more attractive than Hanesbrands.

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.610, which suggesting that the stock is 61.04% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.753, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.262%.

Oxford Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.85%. Hanesbrands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oxford Industries pays 68.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Hanesbrands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oxford Industries quarterly revenues are $308M, which are smaller than Hanesbrands quarterly revenues of $796.7M. Oxford Industries's net income of -$3.9M is higher than Hanesbrands's net income of -$12.9M. Notably, Oxford Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.07x while Hanesbrands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oxford Industries is 0.57x versus 0.52x for Hanesbrands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of -1.28% compared to Oxford Industries's net margin of 13.88%. Oxford Industries's return on equity of 2.49% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 28.48%.

Oxford Industries has a consensus price target of $82.00, signalling upside risk potential of 48.44%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $292.13 which suggests that it could grow by 34.82%. Given that Oxford Industries has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe Oxford Industries is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.610, which suggesting that the stock is 61.04% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.503, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.258%.

Oxford Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.85%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Oxford Industries pays 68.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oxford Industries quarterly revenues are $308M, which are smaller than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Oxford Industries's net income of -$3.9M is lower than Ralph Lauren's net income of $297.4M. Notably, Oxford Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.07x while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 19.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oxford Industries is 0.57x versus 2.01x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yunhong Green CTI has a net margin of -1.28% compared to Oxford Industries's net margin of -46.97%. Oxford Industries's return on equity of 2.49% beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74%.

Oxford Industries has a consensus price target of $82.00, signalling upside risk potential of 48.44%. On the other hand Yunhong Green CTI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 723.53%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than Oxford Industries, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than Oxford Industries.

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.610, which suggesting that the stock is 61.04% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.66999999999999%.

Oxford Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.85%. Yunhong Green CTI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oxford Industries pays 68.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Yunhong Green CTI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oxford Industries quarterly revenues are $308M, which are larger than Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Oxford Industries's net income of -$3.9M is lower than Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Oxford Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 62.07x while Yunhong Green CTI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oxford Industries is 0.57x versus 1.01x for Yunhong Green CTI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.