OXM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 4.58% compared to Oxford Industries's net margin of 3.8%. Oxford Industries's return on equity of 15.44% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -5.58%.

Oxford Industries has a consensus price target of $57.67, signalling downside risk potential of -1.71%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.6%. Given that Bassett Furniture Industries has higher upside potential than Oxford Industries, analysts believe Bassett Furniture Industries is more attractive than Oxford Industries.

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.399, which suggesting that the stock is 39.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.337, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.665%.

Oxford Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 4.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Oxford Industries pays 46.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oxford Industries quarterly revenues are $390.5M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $84.3M. Oxford Industries's net income of $17.9M is higher than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Oxford Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.99x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oxford Industries is 0.61x versus 0.41x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 4.58% compared to Oxford Industries's net margin of --. Oxford Industries's return on equity of 15.44% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Oxford Industries has a consensus price target of $57.67, signalling downside risk potential of -1.71%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 42.86%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Oxford Industries, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Oxford Industries.

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.399, which suggesting that the stock is 39.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.518, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.799%.

Oxford Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oxford Industries pays 46.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oxford Industries quarterly revenues are $390.5M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Oxford Industries's net income of $17.9M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Oxford Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.99x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oxford Industries is 0.61x versus 126.55x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of 4.58% compared to Oxford Industries's net margin of --. Oxford Industries's return on equity of 15.44% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Oxford Industries has a consensus price target of $57.67, signalling downside risk potential of -1.71%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Oxford Industries has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Oxford Industries is more attractive than Northann.

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.399, which suggesting that the stock is 39.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oxford Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oxford Industries pays 46.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oxford Industries quarterly revenues are $390.5M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Oxford Industries's net income of $17.9M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Oxford Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.99x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oxford Industries is 0.61x versus 0.36x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 4.58% compared to Oxford Industries's net margin of 9.17%. Oxford Industries's return on equity of 15.44% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Oxford Industries has a consensus price target of $57.67, signalling downside risk potential of -1.71%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $329.91 which suggests that it could grow by 27.3%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than Oxford Industries, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than Oxford Industries.

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.399, which suggesting that the stock is 39.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.555%.

Oxford Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.57%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oxford Industries pays 46.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxford Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oxford Industries quarterly revenues are $390.5M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Oxford Industries's net income of $17.9M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Oxford Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.99x while Tesla's PE ratio is 127.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oxford Industries is 0.61x versus 9.28x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.