MTW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Astec Industries has a net margin of -1.34% compared to Manitowoc's net margin of 4.34%. Manitowoc's return on equity of 7.29% beat Astec Industries's return on equity of 2.37%.

Manitowoc has a consensus price target of $11.20, signalling upside risk potential of 6.57%. On the other hand Astec Industries has an analysts' consensus of $43.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.44%. Given that Astec Industries has higher upside potential than Manitowoc, analysts believe Astec Industries is more attractive than Manitowoc.

Manitowoc has a beta of 1.916, which suggesting that the stock is 91.58% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Astec Industries has a beta of 1.401, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.112%.

Manitowoc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Astec Industries offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Manitowoc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Astec Industries pays out 276.74% of its earnings as a dividend.

Manitowoc quarterly revenues are $470.9M, which are larger than Astec Industries quarterly revenues of $329.4M. Manitowoc's net income of -$6.3M is lower than Astec Industries's net income of $14.3M. Notably, Manitowoc's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.41x while Astec Industries's PE ratio is 59.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manitowoc is 0.17x versus 0.68x for Astec Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Caterpillar has a net margin of -1.34% compared to Manitowoc's net margin of 14.06%. Manitowoc's return on equity of 7.29% beat Caterpillar's return on equity of 54.17%.

Manitowoc has a consensus price target of $11.20, signalling upside risk potential of 6.57%. On the other hand Caterpillar has an analysts' consensus of $370.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.31%. Given that Manitowoc has higher upside potential than Caterpillar, analysts believe Manitowoc is more attractive than Caterpillar.

Manitowoc has a beta of 1.916, which suggesting that the stock is 91.58% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caterpillar has a beta of 1.349, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.91%.

Manitowoc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Caterpillar offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share. Manitowoc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar pays out 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manitowoc quarterly revenues are $470.9M, which are smaller than Caterpillar quarterly revenues of $14.2B. Manitowoc's net income of -$6.3M is lower than Caterpillar's net income of $2B. Notably, Manitowoc's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.41x while Caterpillar's PE ratio is 16.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manitowoc is 0.17x versus 2.66x for Caterpillar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a net margin of -1.34% compared to Manitowoc's net margin of 11.8%. Manitowoc's return on equity of 7.29% beat Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 34.79%.

Manitowoc has a consensus price target of $11.20, signalling upside risk potential of 6.57%. On the other hand Lincoln Electric Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $209.89 which suggests that it could grow by 8.42%. Given that Lincoln Electric Holdings has higher upside potential than Manitowoc, analysts believe Lincoln Electric Holdings is more attractive than Manitowoc.

Manitowoc has a beta of 1.916, which suggesting that the stock is 91.58% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.178, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.758%.

Manitowoc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Electric Holdings offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Manitowoc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays out 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manitowoc quarterly revenues are $470.9M, which are smaller than Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues of $1B. Manitowoc's net income of -$6.3M is lower than Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $118.5M. Notably, Manitowoc's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.41x while Lincoln Electric Holdings's PE ratio is 23.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manitowoc is 0.17x versus 2.73x for Lincoln Electric Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Terex has a net margin of -1.34% compared to Manitowoc's net margin of 1.71%. Manitowoc's return on equity of 7.29% beat Terex's return on equity of 13.48%.

Manitowoc has a consensus price target of $11.20, signalling upside risk potential of 6.57%. On the other hand Terex has an analysts' consensus of $49.32 which suggests that it could grow by 9.57%. Given that Terex has higher upside potential than Manitowoc, analysts believe Terex is more attractive than Manitowoc.

Manitowoc has a beta of 1.916, which suggesting that the stock is 91.58% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Terex has a beta of 1.525, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.522%.

Manitowoc has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Terex offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Manitowoc pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Terex pays out 13.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Terex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Manitowoc quarterly revenues are $470.9M, which are smaller than Terex quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Manitowoc's net income of -$6.3M is lower than Terex's net income of $21M. Notably, Manitowoc's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.41x while Terex's PE ratio is 12.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Manitowoc is 0.17x versus 0.60x for Terex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.