ML Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of 1.09% compared to MoneyLion's net margin of 20.17%. MoneyLion's return on equity of 3.32% beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 82.22%.

MoneyLion has a consensus price target of $94.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.38%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $309.94 which suggests that it could grow by 5.18%. Given that MoneyLion has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe MoneyLion is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

MoneyLion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.191%.

MoneyLion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. MoneyLion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MoneyLion quarterly revenues are $158.6M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $4.8B. MoneyLion's net income of $1.7M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $963.2M. Notably, MoneyLion's price-to-earnings ratio is 114.89x while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 30.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MoneyLion is 1.86x versus 6.43x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of 1.09% compared to MoneyLion's net margin of 18.49%. MoneyLion's return on equity of 3.32% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

MoneyLion has a consensus price target of $94.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.38%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $329.88 which suggests that it could grow by 25.18%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than MoneyLion, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than MoneyLion.

MoneyLion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.404%.

MoneyLion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MoneyLion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MoneyLion quarterly revenues are $158.6M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. MoneyLion's net income of $1.7M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, MoneyLion's price-to-earnings ratio is 114.89x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 51.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MoneyLion is 1.86x versus 9.33x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Agilysys has a net margin of 1.09% compared to MoneyLion's net margin of 5.51%. MoneyLion's return on equity of 3.32% beat Agilysys's return on equity of 8.99%.

MoneyLion has a consensus price target of $94.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.38%. On the other hand Agilysys has an analysts' consensus of $122.00 which suggests that it could grow by 67.33%. Given that Agilysys has higher upside potential than MoneyLion, analysts believe Agilysys is more attractive than MoneyLion.

MoneyLion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys has a beta of 0.640, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.955%.

MoneyLion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MoneyLion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys pays out 1.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MoneyLion quarterly revenues are $158.6M, which are larger than Agilysys quarterly revenues of $69.6M. MoneyLion's net income of $1.7M is lower than Agilysys's net income of $3.8M. Notably, MoneyLion's price-to-earnings ratio is 114.89x while Agilysys's PE ratio is 91.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MoneyLion is 1.86x versus 7.79x for Agilysys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 1.09% compared to MoneyLion's net margin of 0.54%. MoneyLion's return on equity of 3.32% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29%.

MoneyLion has a consensus price target of $94.25, signalling upside risk potential of 9.38%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 278.48%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than MoneyLion, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than MoneyLion.

MoneyLion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.768%.

MoneyLion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MoneyLion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MoneyLion quarterly revenues are $158.6M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.2M. MoneyLion's net income of $1.7M is higher than Inuvo's net income of $141.3K. Notably, MoneyLion's price-to-earnings ratio is 114.89x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MoneyLion is 1.86x versus 0.62x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.