LSPD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Destiny Media Technologies has a net margin of -10.7% compared to Lightspeed Commerce's net margin of -12.65%. Lightspeed Commerce's return on equity of -5.73% beat Destiny Media Technologies's return on equity of 3.33%.

Lightspeed Commerce has a consensus price target of $18.75, signalling upside risk potential of 19.29%. On the other hand Destiny Media Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lightspeed Commerce has higher upside potential than Destiny Media Technologies, analysts believe Lightspeed Commerce is more attractive than Destiny Media Technologies.

Lightspeed Commerce has a beta of 2.684, which suggesting that the stock is 168.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Destiny Media Technologies has a beta of 0.994, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.626%.

Lightspeed Commerce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Destiny Media Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lightspeed Commerce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Destiny Media Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lightspeed Commerce quarterly revenues are $277.2M, which are larger than Destiny Media Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.1M. Lightspeed Commerce's net income of -$29.7M is lower than Destiny Media Technologies's net income of -$142.2K. Notably, Lightspeed Commerce's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Destiny Media Technologies's PE ratio is 88.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lightspeed Commerce is 2.39x versus 1.66x for Destiny Media Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ehave has a net margin of -10.7% compared to Lightspeed Commerce's net margin of --. Lightspeed Commerce's return on equity of -5.73% beat Ehave's return on equity of --.

Lightspeed Commerce has a consensus price target of $18.75, signalling upside risk potential of 19.29%. On the other hand Ehave has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lightspeed Commerce has higher upside potential than Ehave, analysts believe Lightspeed Commerce is more attractive than Ehave.

Lightspeed Commerce has a beta of 2.684, which suggesting that the stock is 168.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ehave has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lightspeed Commerce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ehave offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lightspeed Commerce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ehave pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lightspeed Commerce quarterly revenues are $277.2M, which are larger than Ehave quarterly revenues of --. Lightspeed Commerce's net income of -$29.7M is higher than Ehave's net income of --. Notably, Lightspeed Commerce's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ehave's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lightspeed Commerce is 2.39x versus -- for Ehave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LeddarTech Holdings has a net margin of -10.7% compared to Lightspeed Commerce's net margin of -938.01%. Lightspeed Commerce's return on equity of -5.73% beat LeddarTech Holdings's return on equity of --.

Lightspeed Commerce has a consensus price target of $18.75, signalling upside risk potential of 19.29%. On the other hand LeddarTech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $2.99 which suggests that it could grow by 90.03%. Given that LeddarTech Holdings has higher upside potential than Lightspeed Commerce, analysts believe LeddarTech Holdings is more attractive than Lightspeed Commerce.

Lightspeed Commerce has a beta of 2.684, which suggesting that the stock is 168.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LeddarTech Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lightspeed Commerce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LeddarTech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lightspeed Commerce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LeddarTech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lightspeed Commerce quarterly revenues are $277.2M, which are larger than LeddarTech Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.4M. Lightspeed Commerce's net income of -$29.7M is lower than LeddarTech Holdings's net income of -$12.9M. Notably, Lightspeed Commerce's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LeddarTech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lightspeed Commerce is 2.39x versus 48.05x for LeddarTech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Versus Systems has a net margin of -10.7% compared to Lightspeed Commerce's net margin of -13746.13%. Lightspeed Commerce's return on equity of -5.73% beat Versus Systems's return on equity of -275.9%.

Lightspeed Commerce has a consensus price target of $18.75, signalling upside risk potential of 19.29%. On the other hand Versus Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -14.26%. Given that Lightspeed Commerce has higher upside potential than Versus Systems, analysts believe Lightspeed Commerce is more attractive than Versus Systems.

Lightspeed Commerce has a beta of 2.684, which suggesting that the stock is 168.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Versus Systems has a beta of 1.728, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.804%.

Lightspeed Commerce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Versus Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lightspeed Commerce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Versus Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lightspeed Commerce quarterly revenues are $277.2M, which are larger than Versus Systems quarterly revenues of $3.9K. Lightspeed Commerce's net income of -$29.7M is lower than Versus Systems's net income of -$529K. Notably, Lightspeed Commerce's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Versus Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lightspeed Commerce is 2.39x versus 63.81x for Versus Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.