KOP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of -2.14% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of -1.23%. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 10.28% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48%.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of $59.50, signalling upside risk potential of 98.27%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Koppers Holdings has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Koppers Holdings is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.745, which suggesting that the stock is 74.508% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.417, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.675%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 11.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $477M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $94.1M. Koppers Holdings's net income of -$10.2M is lower than Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.35x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 20.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.31x versus 0.26x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -2.14% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of --. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 10.28% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of $59.50, signalling upside risk potential of 98.27%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 216.62%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Koppers Holdings, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Koppers Holdings.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.745, which suggesting that the stock is 74.508% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.923, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.323%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 11.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $477M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Koppers Holdings's net income of -$10.2M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.35x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.31x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rayonier Advanced Materials has a net margin of -2.14% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of -3.84%. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 10.28% beat Rayonier Advanced Materials's return on equity of -5.27%.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of $59.50, signalling upside risk potential of 98.27%. On the other hand Rayonier Advanced Materials has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 102.95%. Given that Rayonier Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than Koppers Holdings, analysts believe Rayonier Advanced Materials is more attractive than Koppers Holdings.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.745, which suggesting that the stock is 74.508% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rayonier Advanced Materials has a beta of 3.016, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 201.57%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Rayonier Advanced Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 11.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Rayonier Advanced Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $477M, which are larger than Rayonier Advanced Materials quarterly revenues of $422.5M. Koppers Holdings's net income of -$10.2M is higher than Rayonier Advanced Materials's net income of -$16.2M. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.35x while Rayonier Advanced Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.31x versus 0.22x for Rayonier Advanced Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -2.14% compared to Koppers Holdings's net margin of --. Koppers Holdings's return on equity of 10.28% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Koppers Holdings has a consensus price target of $59.50, signalling upside risk potential of 98.27%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 134.34%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Koppers Holdings, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Koppers Holdings.

Koppers Holdings has a beta of 1.745, which suggesting that the stock is 74.508% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.928%.

Koppers Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Koppers Holdings pays 11.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koppers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Koppers Holdings quarterly revenues are $477M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Koppers Holdings's net income of -$10.2M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Koppers Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.35x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koppers Holdings is 0.31x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.