KGC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gatos Silver has a net margin of 24.81% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of --. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 11.59% beat Gatos Silver's return on equity of --.

Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $11.17, signalling upside risk potential of 8.33%. On the other hand Gatos Silver has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.32%. Given that Gatos Silver has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold, analysts believe Gatos Silver is more attractive than Kinross Gold.

Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gatos Silver has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kinross Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Gatos Silver offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinross Gold pays 35.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Gatos Silver pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinross Gold quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Gatos Silver quarterly revenues of --. Kinross Gold's net income of $355.3M is higher than Gatos Silver's net income of $9.9M. Notably, Kinross Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.18x while Gatos Silver's PE ratio is 30.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold is 2.63x versus -- for Gatos Silver. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty has a net margin of 24.81% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of -124.64%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 11.59% beat Gold Royalty's return on equity of -3.65%.

Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $11.17, signalling upside risk potential of 8.33%. On the other hand Gold Royalty has an analysts' consensus of $3.18 which suggests that it could grow by 147.54%. Given that Gold Royalty has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold, analysts believe Gold Royalty is more attractive than Kinross Gold.

Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kinross Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Gold Royalty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Kinross Gold pays 35.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty pays out -9.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinross Gold quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Gold Royalty quarterly revenues of $2.1M. Kinross Gold's net income of $355.3M is higher than Gold Royalty's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Kinross Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.18x while Gold Royalty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold is 2.63x versus 24.16x for Gold Royalty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen Mining has a net margin of 24.81% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of -3.98%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 11.59% beat McEwen Mining's return on equity of 21.4%.

Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $11.17, signalling upside risk potential of 8.33%. On the other hand McEwen Mining has an analysts' consensus of $14.63 which suggests that it could grow by 74.32%. Given that McEwen Mining has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold, analysts believe McEwen Mining is more attractive than Kinross Gold.

Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen Mining has a beta of 1.425, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.457%.

Kinross Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. McEwen Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinross Gold pays 35.38% of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinross Gold quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than McEwen Mining quarterly revenues of $52.3M. Kinross Gold's net income of $355.3M is higher than McEwen Mining's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Kinross Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.18x while McEwen Mining's PE ratio is 3.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold is 2.63x versus 2.09x for McEwen Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold has a net margin of 24.81% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of --. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 11.59% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity of --.

Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $11.17, signalling upside risk potential of 8.33%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold has an analysts' consensus of $41.62 which suggests that it could grow by 246.73%. Given that Seabridge Gold has higher upside potential than Kinross Gold, analysts believe Seabridge Gold is more attractive than Kinross Gold.

Kinross Gold has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.27%.

Kinross Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Seabridge Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kinross Gold pays 35.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinross Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kinross Gold quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Seabridge Gold quarterly revenues of --. Kinross Gold's net income of $355.3M is higher than Seabridge Gold's net income of -$20.2M. Notably, Kinross Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.18x while Seabridge Gold's PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kinross Gold is 2.63x versus -- for Seabridge Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.