HPP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Medical Properties Trust has a net margin of -47.54% compared to Hudson Pacific Properties's net margin of -354.77%. Hudson Pacific Properties's return on equity of -8.02% beat Medical Properties Trust's return on equity of -38.84%.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a consensus price target of $4.67, signalling upside risk potential of 71.79%. On the other hand Medical Properties Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 16.69%. Given that Hudson Pacific Properties has higher upside potential than Medical Properties Trust, analysts believe Hudson Pacific Properties is more attractive than Medical Properties Trust.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a beta of 1.299, which suggesting that the stock is 29.868% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Medical Properties Trust has a beta of 1.299, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.917%.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. Medical Properties Trust offers a yield of 11.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Hudson Pacific Properties pays -43.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Medical Properties Trust pays out -110.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hudson Pacific Properties quarterly revenues are $200.4M, which are smaller than Medical Properties Trust quarterly revenues of $225.8M. Hudson Pacific Properties's net income of -$95.3M is higher than Medical Properties Trust's net income of -$801.2M. Notably, Hudson Pacific Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Medical Properties Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Pacific Properties is 0.45x versus 3.66x for Medical Properties Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Piedmont Office Realty Trust has a net margin of -47.54% compared to Hudson Pacific Properties's net margin of -8.27%. Hudson Pacific Properties's return on equity of -8.02% beat Piedmont Office Realty Trust's return on equity of -4.56%.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a consensus price target of $4.67, signalling upside risk potential of 71.79%. On the other hand Piedmont Office Realty Trust has an analysts' consensus of $9.17 which suggests that it could grow by 24.58%. Given that Hudson Pacific Properties has higher upside potential than Piedmont Office Realty Trust, analysts believe Hudson Pacific Properties is more attractive than Piedmont Office Realty Trust.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a beta of 1.299, which suggesting that the stock is 29.868% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Piedmont Office Realty Trust has a beta of 1.194, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.442%.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. Piedmont Office Realty Trust offers a yield of 5.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Hudson Pacific Properties pays -43.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Piedmont Office Realty Trust pays out -192.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hudson Pacific Properties quarterly revenues are $200.4M, which are larger than Piedmont Office Realty Trust quarterly revenues of $139.3M. Hudson Pacific Properties's net income of -$95.3M is lower than Piedmont Office Realty Trust's net income of -$11.5M. Notably, Hudson Pacific Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Piedmont Office Realty Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Pacific Properties is 0.45x versus 1.91x for Piedmont Office Realty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Service Properties Trust has a net margin of -47.54% compared to Hudson Pacific Properties's net margin of -9.55%. Hudson Pacific Properties's return on equity of -8.02% beat Service Properties Trust's return on equity of -21.72%.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a consensus price target of $4.67, signalling upside risk potential of 71.79%. On the other hand Service Properties Trust has an analysts' consensus of $2.98 which suggests that it could grow by 14.87%. Given that Hudson Pacific Properties has higher upside potential than Service Properties Trust, analysts believe Hudson Pacific Properties is more attractive than Service Properties Trust.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a beta of 1.299, which suggesting that the stock is 29.868% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Service Properties Trust has a beta of 2.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.764%.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. Service Properties Trust offers a yield of 23.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Hudson Pacific Properties pays -43.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Service Properties Trust pays out -404.01% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hudson Pacific Properties quarterly revenues are $200.4M, which are smaller than Service Properties Trust quarterly revenues of $491.2M. Hudson Pacific Properties's net income of -$95.3M is lower than Service Properties Trust's net income of -$46.9M. Notably, Hudson Pacific Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Service Properties Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Pacific Properties is 0.45x versus 0.23x for Service Properties Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Welltower has a net margin of -47.54% compared to Hudson Pacific Properties's net margin of 22.37%. Hudson Pacific Properties's return on equity of -8.02% beat Welltower's return on equity of 3.28%.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a consensus price target of $4.67, signalling upside risk potential of 71.79%. On the other hand Welltower has an analysts' consensus of $144.74 which suggests that it could grow by 14.44%. Given that Hudson Pacific Properties has higher upside potential than Welltower, analysts believe Hudson Pacific Properties is more attractive than Welltower.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a beta of 1.299, which suggesting that the stock is 29.868% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Welltower has a beta of 1.226, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.591%.

Hudson Pacific Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.68%. Welltower offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Hudson Pacific Properties pays -43.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Welltower pays out 370.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hudson Pacific Properties quarterly revenues are $200.4M, which are smaller than Welltower quarterly revenues of $2B. Hudson Pacific Properties's net income of -$95.3M is lower than Welltower's net income of $449.8M. Notably, Hudson Pacific Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Welltower's PE ratio is 83.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Pacific Properties is 0.45x versus 10.12x for Welltower. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.