SVC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

National Health Investors has a net margin of -26.76% compared to Service Properties Trust's net margin of 38.26%. Service Properties Trust's return on equity of -33.8% beat National Health Investors's return on equity of 10.68%.

Service Properties Trust has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 6.38%. On the other hand National Health Investors has an analysts' consensus of $80.86 which suggests that it could grow by 14%. Given that National Health Investors has higher upside potential than Service Properties Trust, analysts believe National Health Investors is more attractive than Service Properties Trust.

Service Properties Trust has a beta of 1.874, which suggesting that the stock is 87.409% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Health Investors has a beta of 0.749, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.101%.

Service Properties Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.79%. National Health Investors offers a yield of 5.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Service Properties Trust pays -36.71% of its earnings as a dividend. National Health Investors pays out 113.43% of its earnings as a dividend.

Service Properties Trust quarterly revenues are $435.2M, which are larger than National Health Investors quarterly revenues of $89.3M. Service Properties Trust's net income of -$116.4M is lower than National Health Investors's net income of $34.2M. Notably, Service Properties Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while National Health Investors's PE ratio is 22.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Service Properties Trust is 0.21x versus 9.25x for National Health Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omega Healthcare Investors has a net margin of -26.76% compared to Service Properties Trust's net margin of 39.39%. Service Properties Trust's return on equity of -33.8% beat Omega Healthcare Investors's return on equity of 10.34%.

Service Properties Trust has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 6.38%. On the other hand Omega Healthcare Investors has an analysts' consensus of $40.36 which suggests that it could grow by 9.01%. Given that Omega Healthcare Investors has higher upside potential than Service Properties Trust, analysts believe Omega Healthcare Investors is more attractive than Service Properties Trust.

Service Properties Trust has a beta of 1.874, which suggesting that the stock is 87.409% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Healthcare Investors has a beta of 0.691, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.906%.

Service Properties Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.79%. Omega Healthcare Investors offers a yield of 7.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Service Properties Trust pays -36.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Healthcare Investors pays out 168.69% of its earnings as a dividend.

Service Properties Trust quarterly revenues are $435.2M, which are larger than Omega Healthcare Investors quarterly revenues of $276.8M. Service Properties Trust's net income of -$116.4M is lower than Omega Healthcare Investors's net income of $109M. Notably, Service Properties Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Omega Healthcare Investors's PE ratio is 22.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Service Properties Trust is 0.21x versus 9.55x for Omega Healthcare Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prologis has a net margin of -26.76% compared to Service Properties Trust's net margin of 27.71%. Service Properties Trust's return on equity of -33.8% beat Prologis's return on equity of 6.45%.

Service Properties Trust has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 6.38%. On the other hand Prologis has an analysts' consensus of $117.15 which suggests that it could grow by 9.2%. Given that Prologis has higher upside potential than Service Properties Trust, analysts believe Prologis is more attractive than Service Properties Trust.

Service Properties Trust has a beta of 1.874, which suggesting that the stock is 87.409% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prologis has a beta of 1.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.436%.

Service Properties Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.79%. Prologis offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Service Properties Trust pays -36.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis pays out 95.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Prologis's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Service Properties Trust quarterly revenues are $435.2M, which are smaller than Prologis quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Service Properties Trust's net income of -$116.4M is lower than Prologis's net income of $593M. Notably, Service Properties Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Prologis's PE ratio is 26.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Service Properties Trust is 0.21x versus 12.21x for Prologis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Welltower has a net margin of -26.76% compared to Service Properties Trust's net margin of 10.8%. Service Properties Trust's return on equity of -33.8% beat Welltower's return on equity of 3.46%.

Service Properties Trust has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 6.38%. On the other hand Welltower has an analysts' consensus of $168.25 which suggests that it could grow by 10.4%. Given that Welltower has higher upside potential than Service Properties Trust, analysts believe Welltower is more attractive than Service Properties Trust.

Service Properties Trust has a beta of 1.874, which suggesting that the stock is 87.409% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Welltower has a beta of 0.937, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.344%.

Service Properties Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.79%. Welltower offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Service Properties Trust pays -36.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Welltower pays out 162.37% of its earnings as a dividend.

Service Properties Trust quarterly revenues are $435.2M, which are smaller than Welltower quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Service Properties Trust's net income of -$116.4M is lower than Welltower's net income of $258M. Notably, Service Properties Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Welltower's PE ratio is 87.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Service Properties Trust is 0.21x versus 11.37x for Welltower. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.