FN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Corning has a net margin of 9.62% compared to Fabrinet's net margin of -3.45%. Fabrinet's return on equity of 18.42% beat Corning's return on equity of 1.36%.

Fabrinet has a consensus price target of $268.22, signalling upside risk potential of 10.89%. On the other hand Corning has an analysts' consensus of $52.99 which suggests that it could grow by 6.33%. Given that Fabrinet has higher upside potential than Corning, analysts believe Fabrinet is more attractive than Corning.

Fabrinet has a beta of 0.928, which suggesting that the stock is 7.247% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Corning has a beta of 1.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.622%.

Fabrinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Corning offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Fabrinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Corning pays out 170.22% of its earnings as a dividend.

Fabrinet quarterly revenues are $804.2M, which are smaller than Corning quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Fabrinet's net income of $77.4M is higher than Corning's net income of -$117M. Notably, Fabrinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.63x while Corning's PE ratio is 293.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fabrinet is 2.95x versus 3.40x for Corning. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jabil has a net margin of 9.62% compared to Fabrinet's net margin of 1.43%. Fabrinet's return on equity of 18.42% beat Jabil's return on equity of 59.91%.

Fabrinet has a consensus price target of $268.22, signalling upside risk potential of 10.89%. On the other hand Jabil has an analysts' consensus of $165.87 which suggests that it could grow by 1.82%. Given that Fabrinet has higher upside potential than Jabil, analysts believe Fabrinet is more attractive than Jabil.

Fabrinet has a beta of 0.928, which suggesting that the stock is 7.247% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jabil has a beta of 1.231, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.148%.

Fabrinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jabil offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Fabrinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil pays out 3.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fabrinet quarterly revenues are $804.2M, which are smaller than Jabil quarterly revenues of $7B. Fabrinet's net income of $77.4M is lower than Jabil's net income of $100M. Notably, Fabrinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.63x while Jabil's PE ratio is 15.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fabrinet is 2.95x versus 0.71x for Jabil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

M-Tron Industries has a net margin of 9.62% compared to Fabrinet's net margin of --. Fabrinet's return on equity of 18.42% beat M-Tron Industries's return on equity of --.

Fabrinet has a consensus price target of $268.22, signalling upside risk potential of 10.89%. On the other hand M-Tron Industries has an analysts' consensus of $63.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.68%. Given that M-Tron Industries has higher upside potential than Fabrinet, analysts believe M-Tron Industries is more attractive than Fabrinet.

Fabrinet has a beta of 0.928, which suggesting that the stock is 7.247% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison M-Tron Industries has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fabrinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. M-Tron Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fabrinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. M-Tron Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fabrinet quarterly revenues are $804.2M, which are larger than M-Tron Industries quarterly revenues of --. Fabrinet's net income of $77.4M is higher than M-Tron Industries's net income of --. Notably, Fabrinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.63x while M-Tron Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fabrinet is 2.95x versus 10.90x for M-Tron Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 9.62% compared to Fabrinet's net margin of 55.04%. Fabrinet's return on equity of 18.42% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

Fabrinet has a consensus price target of $268.22, signalling upside risk potential of 10.89%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $173.08 which suggests that it could grow by 25.69%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Fabrinet, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Fabrinet.

Fabrinet has a beta of 0.928, which suggesting that the stock is 7.247% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.643, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.285%.

Fabrinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Fabrinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fabrinet quarterly revenues are $804.2M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. Fabrinet's net income of $77.4M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, Fabrinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.63x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 54.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fabrinet is 2.95x versus 30.23x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.