FICO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gen Digital has a net margin of 29.9% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 16.53%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Gen Digital's return on equity of 27.94%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,164.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.9%. On the other hand Gen Digital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.32%. Given that Gen Digital has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Gen Digital is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.699% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gen Digital has a beta of 0.795, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.547%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gen Digital offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gen Digital pays out 52.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Gen Digital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $453.8M, which are smaller than Gen Digital quarterly revenues of $974M. Fair Isaac's net income of $135.7M is lower than Gen Digital's net income of $161M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 96.32x while Gen Digital's PE ratio is 27.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 28.76x versus 4.48x for Gen Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intapp has a net margin of 29.9% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of -3.81%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Intapp's return on equity of -5.44%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,164.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.9%. On the other hand Intapp has an analysts' consensus of $72.13 which suggests that it could grow by 8.66%. Given that Fair Isaac has higher upside potential than Intapp, analysts believe Fair Isaac is more attractive than Intapp.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.699% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intapp has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intapp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intapp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $453.8M, which are larger than Intapp quarterly revenues of $118.8M. Fair Isaac's net income of $135.7M is higher than Intapp's net income of -$4.5M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 96.32x while Intapp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 28.76x versus 10.85x for Intapp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of 29.9% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 22.41%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Oracle's return on equity of 128.3%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,164.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.9%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $196.55 which suggests that it could grow by 23.2%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.699% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.059, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.865%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $453.8M, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Fair Isaac's net income of $135.7M is lower than Oracle's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 96.32x while Oracle's PE ratio is 39.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 28.76x versus 8.26x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PTC has a net margin of 29.9% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 20.19%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat PTC's return on equity of 12.84%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,164.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.9%. On the other hand PTC has an analysts' consensus of $211.67 which suggests that it could grow by 13.21%. Given that PTC has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe PTC is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.699% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PTC has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.99%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PTC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PTC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $453.8M, which are smaller than PTC quarterly revenues of $626.5M. Fair Isaac's net income of $135.7M is higher than PTC's net income of $126.5M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 96.32x while PTC's PE ratio is 60.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 28.76x versus 9.82x for PTC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.