Financhill
Sell
47

ENR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$35.78
Seasonality move :
1.24%
Day range:
$34.39 - $34.96
52-week range:
$26.92 - $39.52
Dividend yield:
3.45%
P/E ratio:
66.96x
P/S ratio:
0.88x
P/B ratio:
18.44x
Volume:
870.6K
Avg. volume:
534.6K
1-year change:
14.01%
Market cap:
$2.5B
Revenue:
$2.9B
EPS (TTM):
$0.52

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
ENR
Energizer Holdings
$727.4M $0.65 1.51% 2074.4% $35.67
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
-- -- -- -- --
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
-- -- -- -- --
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
-- -- -- -- --
IIIN
Insteel Industries
$117.5M $0.10 -3.51% 58.33% --
NWPX
Northwest Pipe
$120.3M $0.91 9.34% 67.9% $56.33
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
ENR
Energizer Holdings
$34.82 $35.67 $2.5B 66.96x $0.30 3.45% 0.88x
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
$16.35 -- $15.8M -- $0.03 2.02% 0.53x
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
$4.62 -- $60.1M 3.37x $0.00 0% 0.70x
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
$5.46 -- $6.1M -- $0.00 0% 0.03x
IIIN
Insteel Industries
$25.30 -- $492.1M 25.56x $1.03 0.47% 0.94x
NWPX
Northwest Pipe
$46.77 $56.33 $463.8M 15.91x $0.00 0% 0.97x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
ENR
Energizer Holdings
95.94% 1.028 140.62% 0.87x
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
-- -0.163 -- 2.68x
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
42.08% -0.753 40.73% 1.55x
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
97.85% 1.455 1339.66% 0.16x
IIIN
Insteel Industries
-- 2.264 -- 3.64x
NWPX
Northwest Pipe
16.47% 2.456 15.96% 2.25x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
ENR
Energizer Holdings
$306.8M $99.2M 1.11% 22.9% 12.08% $141.5M
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
$695K -$823.6K -13.89% -13.89% -11.82% -$368.9K
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
$4.2M $1.5M 43.19% 84.62% 7.61% $586.9K
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
$8.5M -$12.8M -108.68% -281.97% -77.39% $2.8M
IIIN
Insteel Industries
$12.3M $4.8M 5.51% 5.51% 4.52% $14.5M
NWPX
Northwest Pipe
$27M $15.4M 6.96% 8.53% 11.81% $16.8M

Energizer Holdings vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns ENR or CVR?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 5.91% compared to Energizer Holdings's net margin of -20.76%. Energizer Holdings's return on equity of 22.9% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ENR
    Energizer Holdings
    38.08% $0.65 $3.3B
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    9.97% -$1.50 $23.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About ENR or CVR?

    Energizer Holdings has a consensus price target of $35.67, signalling upside risk potential of 9.45%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Energizer Holdings has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Energizer Holdings is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ENR
    Energizer Holdings
    2 5 0
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0 0 0
  • Is ENR or CVR More Risky?

    Energizer Holdings has a beta of 1.069, which suggesting that the stock is 6.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.157, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.259%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ENR or CVR?

    Energizer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.45%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Energizer Holdings pays 229.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -14.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ENR or CVR?

    Energizer Holdings quarterly revenues are $805.7M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. Energizer Holdings's net income of $47.6M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Energizer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.96x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings is 0.88x versus 0.53x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ENR
    Energizer Holdings
    0.88x 66.96x $805.7M $47.6M
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0.53x -- $7M -$1.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns ENR or CVU?

    CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 5.91% compared to Energizer Holdings's net margin of 3.86%. Energizer Holdings's return on equity of 22.9% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ENR
    Energizer Holdings
    38.08% $0.65 $3.3B
    CVU
    CPI Aerostructures
    21.73% $0.06 $43.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About ENR or CVU?

    Energizer Holdings has a consensus price target of $35.67, signalling upside risk potential of 9.45%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -13.42%. Given that Energizer Holdings has higher upside potential than CPI Aerostructures, analysts believe Energizer Holdings is more attractive than CPI Aerostructures.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ENR
    Energizer Holdings
    2 5 0
    CVU
    CPI Aerostructures
    0 0 0
  • Is ENR or CVU More Risky?

    Energizer Holdings has a beta of 1.069, which suggesting that the stock is 6.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.339%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ENR or CVU?

    Energizer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.45%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energizer Holdings pays 229.4% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ENR or CVU?

    Energizer Holdings quarterly revenues are $805.7M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Energizer Holdings's net income of $47.6M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, Energizer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.96x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 3.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings is 0.88x versus 0.70x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ENR
    Energizer Holdings
    0.88x 66.96x $805.7M $47.6M
    CVU
    CPI Aerostructures
    0.70x 3.37x $19.4M $749.7K
  • Which has Higher Returns ENR or GPUS?

    Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 5.91% compared to Energizer Holdings's net margin of -82.25%. Energizer Holdings's return on equity of 22.9% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ENR
    Energizer Holdings
    38.08% $0.65 $3.3B
    GPUS
    Hyperscale Data
    27.51% -$24.85 $126.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About ENR or GPUS?

    Energizer Holdings has a consensus price target of $35.67, signalling upside risk potential of 9.45%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9615303.85%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Energizer Holdings, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Energizer Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ENR
    Energizer Holdings
    2 5 0
    GPUS
    Hyperscale Data
    0 0 0
  • Is ENR or GPUS More Risky?

    Energizer Holdings has a beta of 1.069, which suggesting that the stock is 6.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.435, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 243.524%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ENR or GPUS?

    Energizer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.45%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energizer Holdings pays 229.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -0.6% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ENR or GPUS?

    Energizer Holdings quarterly revenues are $805.7M, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. Energizer Holdings's net income of $47.6M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, Energizer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.96x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings is 0.88x versus 0.03x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ENR
    Energizer Holdings
    0.88x 66.96x $805.7M $47.6M
    GPUS
    Hyperscale Data
    0.03x -- $31.1M -$25.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns ENR or IIIN?

    Insteel Industries has a net margin of 5.91% compared to Energizer Holdings's net margin of 3.48%. Energizer Holdings's return on equity of 22.9% beat Insteel Industries's return on equity of 5.51%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ENR
    Energizer Holdings
    38.08% $0.65 $3.3B
    IIIN
    Insteel Industries
    9.13% $0.24 $350.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About ENR or IIIN?

    Energizer Holdings has a consensus price target of $35.67, signalling upside risk potential of 9.45%. On the other hand Insteel Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34.39%. Given that Insteel Industries has higher upside potential than Energizer Holdings, analysts believe Insteel Industries is more attractive than Energizer Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ENR
    Energizer Holdings
    2 5 0
    IIIN
    Insteel Industries
    0 0 0
  • Is ENR or IIIN More Risky?

    Energizer Holdings has a beta of 1.069, which suggesting that the stock is 6.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Insteel Industries has a beta of 1.139, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.932%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ENR or IIIN?

    Energizer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.45%. Insteel Industries offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. Energizer Holdings pays 229.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Insteel Industries pays out 263.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ENR or IIIN?

    Energizer Holdings quarterly revenues are $805.7M, which are larger than Insteel Industries quarterly revenues of $134.3M. Energizer Holdings's net income of $47.6M is higher than Insteel Industries's net income of $4.7M. Notably, Energizer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.96x while Insteel Industries's PE ratio is 25.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings is 0.88x versus 0.94x for Insteel Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ENR
    Energizer Holdings
    0.88x 66.96x $805.7M $47.6M
    IIIN
    Insteel Industries
    0.94x 25.56x $134.3M $4.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns ENR or NWPX?

    Northwest Pipe has a net margin of 5.91% compared to Energizer Holdings's net margin of 7.88%. Energizer Holdings's return on equity of 22.9% beat Northwest Pipe's return on equity of 8.53%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ENR
    Energizer Holdings
    38.08% $0.65 $3.3B
    NWPX
    Northwest Pipe
    20.75% $1.02 $433.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About ENR or NWPX?

    Energizer Holdings has a consensus price target of $35.67, signalling upside risk potential of 9.45%. On the other hand Northwest Pipe has an analysts' consensus of $56.33 which suggests that it could grow by 20.46%. Given that Northwest Pipe has higher upside potential than Energizer Holdings, analysts believe Northwest Pipe is more attractive than Energizer Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ENR
    Energizer Holdings
    2 5 0
    NWPX
    Northwest Pipe
    1 1 0
  • Is ENR or NWPX More Risky?

    Energizer Holdings has a beta of 1.069, which suggesting that the stock is 6.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northwest Pipe has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.084%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ENR or NWPX?

    Energizer Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.45%. Northwest Pipe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energizer Holdings pays 229.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Northwest Pipe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ENR or NWPX?

    Energizer Holdings quarterly revenues are $805.7M, which are larger than Northwest Pipe quarterly revenues of $130.2M. Energizer Holdings's net income of $47.6M is higher than Northwest Pipe's net income of $10.3M. Notably, Energizer Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.96x while Northwest Pipe's PE ratio is 15.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energizer Holdings is 0.88x versus 0.97x for Northwest Pipe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ENR
    Energizer Holdings
    0.88x 66.96x $805.7M $47.6M
    NWPX
    Northwest Pipe
    0.97x 15.91x $130.2M $10.3M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will Cisco Systems Stock Be in 10 Years?
Where Will Cisco Systems Stock Be in 10 Years?

Cisco Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CSCO) has enjoyed its position as a…

Disney vs Estée Lauder Stock, Which Is Best?
Disney vs Estée Lauder Stock, Which Is Best?

Inflation has eaten away at a lot of the money…

Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?

With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…

Stock Ideas

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x

Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8

Inari Medical [NARI] is down 0.23% over the past day.

Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8

UniFirst [UNF] is up 4.97% over the past day.

Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8

Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 8.78% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock