CLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HP has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.45%. Celestica's return on equity of 21.34% beat HP's return on equity of --.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $86.38, signalling downside risk potential of -23.75%. On the other hand HP has an analysts' consensus of $36.53 which suggests that it could grow by 11.87%. Given that HP has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe HP is more attractive than Celestica.

Celestica has a beta of 2.247, which suggesting that the stock is 124.7% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HP has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.16%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HP offers a yield of 3.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HP pays out 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. HP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than HP quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Celestica's net income of $91.7M is lower than HP's net income of $906M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.96x while HP's PE ratio is 11.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.46x versus 0.60x for HP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jabil has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Celestica's net margin of 1.43%. Celestica's return on equity of 21.34% beat Jabil's return on equity of 59.91%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $86.38, signalling downside risk potential of -23.75%. On the other hand Jabil has an analysts' consensus of $165.87 which suggests that it could grow by 1.82%. Given that Jabil has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe Jabil is more attractive than Celestica.

Celestica has a beta of 2.247, which suggesting that the stock is 124.7% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jabil has a beta of 1.231, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.148%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jabil offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil pays out 3.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Jabil quarterly revenues of $7B. Celestica's net income of $91.7M is lower than Jabil's net income of $100M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.96x while Jabil's PE ratio is 15.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.46x versus 0.71x for Jabil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Celestica's net margin of -105.32%. Celestica's return on equity of 21.34% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -275.7%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $86.38, signalling downside risk potential of -23.75%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 562.54%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Celestica.

Celestica has a beta of 2.247, which suggesting that the stock is 124.7% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 4.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 330.016%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Celestica's net income of $91.7M is higher than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.96x while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.46x versus 0.04x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zebra Technologies has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Celestica's net margin of 10.92%. Celestica's return on equity of 21.34% beat Zebra Technologies's return on equity of 11.99%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $86.38, signalling downside risk potential of -23.75%. On the other hand Zebra Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $419.60 which suggests that it could grow by 3.42%. Given that Zebra Technologies has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe Zebra Technologies is more attractive than Celestica.

Celestica has a beta of 2.247, which suggesting that the stock is 124.7% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.638, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.809%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zebra Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zebra Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Zebra Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Celestica's net income of $91.7M is lower than Zebra Technologies's net income of $137M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.96x while Zebra Technologies's PE ratio is 55.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.46x versus 4.51x for Zebra Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.