CLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Super Micro Computer has a net margin of 3.26% compared to Celestica's net margin of 2.37%. Celestica's return on equity of 23.47% beat Super Micro Computer's return on equity of 19.84%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $125.02, signalling upside risk potential of 4.27%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer has an analysts' consensus of $42.93 which suggests that it could fall by -2.71%. Given that Celestica has higher upside potential than Super Micro Computer, analysts believe Celestica is more attractive than Super Micro Computer.

Celestica has a beta of 1.742, which suggesting that the stock is 74.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer has a beta of 1.403, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.293%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Super Micro Computer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Super Micro Computer quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Celestica's net income of $86.2M is lower than Super Micro Computer's net income of $108.8M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.03x while Super Micro Computer's PE ratio is 23.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.40x versus 1.30x for Super Micro Computer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siyata Mobile has a net margin of 3.26% compared to Celestica's net margin of -153.51%. Celestica's return on equity of 23.47% beat Siyata Mobile's return on equity of -469.42%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $125.02, signalling upside risk potential of 4.27%. On the other hand Siyata Mobile has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30376.14%. Given that Siyata Mobile has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe Siyata Mobile is more attractive than Celestica.

Celestica has a beta of 1.742, which suggesting that the stock is 74.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siyata Mobile has a beta of 2.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.59%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Siyata Mobile offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siyata Mobile pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Siyata Mobile quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Celestica's net income of $86.2M is higher than Siyata Mobile's net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.03x while Siyata Mobile's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.40x versus 0.23x for Siyata Mobile. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of 3.26% compared to Celestica's net margin of -105.32%. Celestica's return on equity of 23.47% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -497.03%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $125.02, signalling upside risk potential of 4.27%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1424.39%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Celestica.

Celestica has a beta of 1.742, which suggesting that the stock is 74.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 3.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 220.555%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.6M. Celestica's net income of $86.2M is higher than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.03x while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.40x versus 0.25x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zebra Technologies has a net margin of 3.26% compared to Celestica's net margin of 10.4%. Celestica's return on equity of 23.47% beat Zebra Technologies's return on equity of 16.06%.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $125.02, signalling upside risk potential of 4.27%. On the other hand Zebra Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $322.67 which suggests that it could grow by 9.9%. Given that Zebra Technologies has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe Zebra Technologies is more attractive than Celestica.

Celestica has a beta of 1.742, which suggesting that the stock is 74.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.747, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.692%.

Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zebra Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zebra Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Zebra Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Celestica's net income of $86.2M is lower than Zebra Technologies's net income of $136M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.03x while Zebra Technologies's PE ratio is 27.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.40x versus 2.96x for Zebra Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.