ZBRA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HP has a net margin of 12.22% compared to Zebra Technologies's net margin of 4.18%. Zebra Technologies's return on equity of 16% beat HP's return on equity of --.

Zebra Technologies has a consensus price target of $391.60, signalling upside risk potential of 35.04%. On the other hand HP has an analysts' consensus of $35.85 which suggests that it could grow by 23.64%. Given that Zebra Technologies has higher upside potential than HP, analysts believe Zebra Technologies is more attractive than HP.

Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.676, which suggesting that the stock is 67.586% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HP has a beta of 1.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.651%.

Zebra Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HP offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Zebra Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HP pays out 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. HP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Zebra Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than HP quarterly revenues of $13.5B. Zebra Technologies's net income of $163M is lower than HP's net income of $565M. Notably, Zebra Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.49x while HP's PE ratio is 10.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zebra Technologies is 3.02x versus 0.53x for HP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quantum Computing has a net margin of 12.22% compared to Zebra Technologies's net margin of -82640.32%. Zebra Technologies's return on equity of 16% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity of -87.97%.

Zebra Technologies has a consensus price target of $391.60, signalling upside risk potential of 35.04%. On the other hand Quantum Computing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -2.86%. Given that Zebra Technologies has higher upside potential than Quantum Computing, analysts believe Zebra Technologies is more attractive than Quantum Computing.

Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.676, which suggesting that the stock is 67.586% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 225.926%.

Zebra Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quantum Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zebra Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quantum Computing pays out -0.31% of its earnings as a dividend.

Zebra Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Quantum Computing quarterly revenues of $62K. Zebra Technologies's net income of $163M is higher than Quantum Computing's net income of -$51.2M. Notably, Zebra Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.49x while Quantum Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zebra Technologies is 3.02x versus 2,210.18x for Quantum Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Super Micro Computer has a net margin of 12.22% compared to Zebra Technologies's net margin of 5.65%. Zebra Technologies's return on equity of 16% beat Super Micro Computer's return on equity of 28.1%.

Zebra Technologies has a consensus price target of $391.60, signalling upside risk potential of 35.04%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer has an analysts' consensus of $52.48 which suggests that it could grow by 25.79%. Given that Zebra Technologies has higher upside potential than Super Micro Computer, analysts believe Zebra Technologies is more attractive than Super Micro Computer.

Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.676, which suggesting that the stock is 67.586% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.827%.

Zebra Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Super Micro Computer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zebra Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zebra Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Super Micro Computer quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Zebra Technologies's net income of $163M is lower than Super Micro Computer's net income of $320.6M. Notably, Zebra Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.49x while Super Micro Computer's PE ratio is 17.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zebra Technologies is 3.02x versus 1.27x for Super Micro Computer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of 12.22% compared to Zebra Technologies's net margin of -105.32%. Zebra Technologies's return on equity of 16% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -275.7%.

Zebra Technologies has a consensus price target of $391.60, signalling upside risk potential of 35.04%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1288.89%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Zebra Technologies, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Zebra Technologies.

Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.676, which suggesting that the stock is 67.586% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 4.489, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 348.942%.

Zebra Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zebra Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zebra Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Zebra Technologies's net income of $163M is higher than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Zebra Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.49x while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zebra Technologies is 3.02x versus 0.02x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.