QUBT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NVIDIA has a net margin of -82640.32% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 56.17%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of -87.97% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -2.86%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $171.10 which suggests that it could grow by 40.86%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Quantum Computing, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Quantum Computing.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.259, which suggesting that the stock is 225.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.766, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.633%.

Quantum Computing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Quantum Computing pays -0.31% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quantum Computing quarterly revenues are $62K, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Quantum Computing's net income of -$51.2M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Quantum Computing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 41.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing is 2,210.18x versus 23.08x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rigetti Computing has a net margin of -82640.32% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of -6726.52%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of -87.97% beat Rigetti Computing's return on equity of -168.4%.

Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -2.86%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 53.37%. Given that Rigetti Computing has higher upside potential than Quantum Computing, analysts believe Rigetti Computing is more attractive than Quantum Computing.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.259, which suggesting that the stock is 225.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Quantum Computing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum Computing pays -0.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quantum Computing quarterly revenues are $62K, which are smaller than Rigetti Computing quarterly revenues of $2.3M. Quantum Computing's net income of -$51.2M is higher than Rigetti Computing's net income of -$153M. Notably, Quantum Computing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rigetti Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing is 2,210.18x versus 167.41x for Rigetti Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of -82640.32% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of -105.32%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of -87.97% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -275.7%.

Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -2.86%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1288.89%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Quantum Computing, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Quantum Computing.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.259, which suggesting that the stock is 225.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 4.489, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 348.942%.

Quantum Computing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum Computing pays -0.31% of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quantum Computing quarterly revenues are $62K, which are smaller than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Quantum Computing's net income of -$51.2M is lower than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Quantum Computing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing is 2,210.18x versus 0.02x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zebra Technologies has a net margin of -82640.32% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 12.22%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of -87.97% beat Zebra Technologies's return on equity of 16%.

Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -2.86%. On the other hand Zebra Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $391.60 which suggests that it could grow by 35.04%. Given that Zebra Technologies has higher upside potential than Quantum Computing, analysts believe Zebra Technologies is more attractive than Quantum Computing.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.259, which suggesting that the stock is 225.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.676, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.586%.

Quantum Computing has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zebra Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum Computing pays -0.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Zebra Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quantum Computing quarterly revenues are $62K, which are smaller than Zebra Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Quantum Computing's net income of -$51.2M is lower than Zebra Technologies's net income of $163M. Notably, Quantum Computing's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zebra Technologies's PE ratio is 28.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing is 2,210.18x versus 3.02x for Zebra Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.