BKH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

OPAL Fuels has a net margin of 16.43% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 1.61%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9% beat OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.4%.

Black Hills has a consensus price target of $65.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.28%. On the other hand OPAL Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $5.19 which suggests that it could grow by 170.18%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than Black Hills.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.681, which suggesting that the stock is 31.938% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. OPAL Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Black Hills pays 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. OPAL Fuels pays out 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

Black Hills quarterly revenues are $597.1M, which are larger than OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues of $80M. Black Hills's net income of $98.1M is higher than OPAL Fuels's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.31x while OPAL Fuels's PE ratio is 96.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 1.97x versus 0.18x for OPAL Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RGC Resources has a net margin of 16.43% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 19.31%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9% beat RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.07%.

Black Hills has a consensus price target of $65.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.28%. On the other hand RGC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.88%. Given that RGC Resources has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe RGC Resources is more attractive than Black Hills.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.681, which suggesting that the stock is 31.938% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RGC Resources has a beta of 0.245, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.455%.

Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. RGC Resources offers a yield of 3.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Black Hills pays 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Black Hills quarterly revenues are $597.1M, which are larger than RGC Resources quarterly revenues of $27.3M. Black Hills's net income of $98.1M is higher than RGC Resources's net income of $5.3M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.31x while RGC Resources's PE ratio is 17.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 1.97x versus 2.41x for RGC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sempra has a net margin of 16.43% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 17.99%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9% beat Sempra's return on equity of 8.07%.

Black Hills has a consensus price target of $65.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.28%. On the other hand Sempra has an analysts' consensus of $82.10 which suggests that it could grow by 17.74%. Given that Sempra has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe Sempra is more attractive than Black Hills.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.681, which suggesting that the stock is 31.938% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sempra has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.537%.

Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Sempra offers a yield of 3.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Black Hills pays 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra pays out 53.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Black Hills quarterly revenues are $597.1M, which are smaller than Sempra quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Black Hills's net income of $98.1M is lower than Sempra's net income of $676M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.31x while Sempra's PE ratio is 15.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 1.97x versus 3.37x for Sempra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UGI has a net margin of 16.43% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 18.47%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9% beat UGI's return on equity of 12.01%.

Black Hills has a consensus price target of $65.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.28%. On the other hand UGI has an analysts' consensus of $35.75 which suggests that it could grow by 8.8%. Given that UGI has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe UGI is more attractive than Black Hills.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.681, which suggesting that the stock is 31.938% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UGI has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.679%.

Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. UGI offers a yield of 4.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Black Hills pays 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. UGI pays out 118.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but UGI's is not.

Black Hills quarterly revenues are $597.1M, which are smaller than UGI quarterly revenues of $2B. Black Hills's net income of $98.1M is lower than UGI's net income of $375M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.31x while UGI's PE ratio is 12.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 1.97x versus 0.99x for UGI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.