Financhill
Sell
39

BKH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$57.62
Seasonality move :
2.14%
Day range:
$58.18 - $58.85
52-week range:
$51.66 - $65.59
Dividend yield:
4.52%
P/E ratio:
14.95x
P/S ratio:
1.88x
P/B ratio:
1.17x
Volume:
472.9K
Avg. volume:
410.1K
1-year change:
6.85%
Market cap:
$4.3B
Revenue:
$2.1B
EPS (TTM):
$3.92

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
BKH
Black Hills
$739.2M $1.93 2.51% 15.91% $65.50
ATO
Atmos Energy
$1.8B $2.88 16.83% 8.14% $160.95
CPK
Chesapeake Utilities
$248.4M $2.25 9.73% 27.28% $134.86
OPAL
OPAL Fuels
$82.2M $0.11 25.09% 268.18% $4.88
RGCO
RGC Resources
$34M $0.68 3.75% -- --
SRE
Sempra
$3.9B $1.32 11.39% -18.58% $80.75
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
BKH
Black Hills
$58.62 $65.50 $4.3B 14.95x $0.68 4.52% 1.88x
ATO
Atmos Energy
$156.49 $160.95 $24.9B 21.83x $0.87 2.18% 5.48x
CPK
Chesapeake Utilities
$123.00 $134.86 $2.9B 22.74x $0.64 2.08% 3.33x
OPAL
OPAL Fuels
$3.13 $4.88 $90.7M 156.50x $0.00 0% 0.27x
RGCO
RGC Resources
$20.80 -- $214.5M 16.25x $0.21 3.92% 2.33x
SRE
Sempra
$78.91 $80.75 $51.5B 17.34x $0.65 3.18% 3.80x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
BKH
Black Hills
54.26% 0.734 96.24% 0.44x
ATO
Atmos Energy
39.3% 0.455 34.65% 1.00x
CPK
Chesapeake Utilities
50.91% 0.646 51.39% 0.31x
OPAL
OPAL Fuels
83.85% 1.989 64.34% 0.91x
RGCO
RGC Resources
54.62% 0.312 66.91% 0.35x
SRE
Sempra
54.37% 1.062 71.59% 0.44x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
BKH
Black Hills
$291.8M $205M 3.5% 7.9% 25.61% $74.9M
ATO
Atmos Energy
$938M $628.9M 5.56% 9.19% 33.48% $83.3M
CPK
Chesapeake Utilities
$119M $87.1M 4.43% 9.13% 29.26% -$28.8M
OPAL
OPAL Fuels
$26.8M $4.9M 1.56% 2.41% -1.45% $18.1M
RGCO
RGC Resources
$14.1M $10.4M 5.13% 11.89% 31.99% $16.1M
SRE
Sempra
$1.8B $959M 4.18% 8.15% 28.51% -$854M

Black Hills vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns BKH or ATO?

    Atmos Energy has a net margin of 16.68% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 24.9%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9% beat Atmos Energy's return on equity of 9.19%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BKH
    Black Hills
    36.24% $1.87 $8B
    ATO
    Atmos Energy
    48.09% $3.03 $21.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About BKH or ATO?

    Black Hills has a consensus price target of $65.50, signalling upside risk potential of 11.74%. On the other hand Atmos Energy has an analysts' consensus of $160.95 which suggests that it could grow by 2.85%. Given that Black Hills has higher upside potential than Atmos Energy, analysts believe Black Hills is more attractive than Atmos Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BKH
    Black Hills
    1 3 0
    ATO
    Atmos Energy
    4 8 0
  • Is BKH or ATO More Risky?

    Black Hills has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atmos Energy has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.437%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BKH or ATO?

    Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.52%. Atmos Energy offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. Black Hills pays 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Atmos Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BKH or ATO?

    Black Hills quarterly revenues are $805.2M, which are smaller than Atmos Energy quarterly revenues of $2B. Black Hills's net income of $134.3M is lower than Atmos Energy's net income of $485.6M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.95x while Atmos Energy's PE ratio is 21.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 1.88x versus 5.48x for Atmos Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BKH
    Black Hills
    1.88x 14.95x $805.2M $134.3M
    ATO
    Atmos Energy
    5.48x 21.83x $2B $485.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns BKH or CPK?

    Chesapeake Utilities has a net margin of 16.68% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 17.04%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9% beat Chesapeake Utilities's return on equity of 9.13%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BKH
    Black Hills
    36.24% $1.87 $8B
    CPK
    Chesapeake Utilities
    39.84% $2.21 $2.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About BKH or CPK?

    Black Hills has a consensus price target of $65.50, signalling upside risk potential of 11.74%. On the other hand Chesapeake Utilities has an analysts' consensus of $134.86 which suggests that it could grow by 9.64%. Given that Black Hills has higher upside potential than Chesapeake Utilities, analysts believe Black Hills is more attractive than Chesapeake Utilities.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BKH
    Black Hills
    1 3 0
    CPK
    Chesapeake Utilities
    3 3 0
  • Is BKH or CPK More Risky?

    Black Hills has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.449%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BKH or CPK?

    Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.52%. Chesapeake Utilities offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share. Black Hills pays 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 45.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BKH or CPK?

    Black Hills quarterly revenues are $805.2M, which are larger than Chesapeake Utilities quarterly revenues of $298.7M. Black Hills's net income of $134.3M is higher than Chesapeake Utilities's net income of $50.9M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.95x while Chesapeake Utilities's PE ratio is 22.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 1.88x versus 3.33x for Chesapeake Utilities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BKH
    Black Hills
    1.88x 14.95x $805.2M $134.3M
    CPK
    Chesapeake Utilities
    3.33x 22.74x $298.7M $50.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns BKH or OPAL?

    OPAL Fuels has a net margin of 16.68% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 2.79%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9% beat OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.41%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BKH
    Black Hills
    36.24% $1.87 $8B
    OPAL
    OPAL Fuels
    31.34% -$0.01 $760.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About BKH or OPAL?

    Black Hills has a consensus price target of $65.50, signalling upside risk potential of 11.74%. On the other hand OPAL Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $4.88 which suggests that it could grow by 55.75%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than Black Hills.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BKH
    Black Hills
    1 3 0
    OPAL
    OPAL Fuels
    5 1 0
  • Is BKH or OPAL More Risky?

    Black Hills has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BKH or OPAL?

    Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.52%. OPAL Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Black Hills pays 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. OPAL Fuels pays out 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BKH or OPAL?

    Black Hills quarterly revenues are $805.2M, which are larger than OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues of $85.4M. Black Hills's net income of $134.3M is higher than OPAL Fuels's net income of $2.4M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.95x while OPAL Fuels's PE ratio is 156.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 1.88x versus 0.27x for OPAL Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BKH
    Black Hills
    1.88x 14.95x $805.2M $134.3M
    OPAL
    OPAL Fuels
    0.27x 156.50x $85.4M $2.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns BKH or RGCO?

    RGC Resources has a net margin of 16.68% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 21.05%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9% beat RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.89%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BKH
    Black Hills
    36.24% $1.87 $8B
    RGCO
    RGC Resources
    38.59% $0.74 $259.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About BKH or RGCO?

    Black Hills has a consensus price target of $65.50, signalling upside risk potential of 11.74%. On the other hand RGC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.81%. Given that RGC Resources has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe RGC Resources is more attractive than Black Hills.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BKH
    Black Hills
    1 3 0
    RGCO
    RGC Resources
    0 0 0
  • Is BKH or RGCO More Risky?

    Black Hills has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RGC Resources has a beta of 0.457, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.286%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BKH or RGCO?

    Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.52%. RGC Resources offers a yield of 3.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Black Hills pays 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BKH or RGCO?

    Black Hills quarterly revenues are $805.2M, which are larger than RGC Resources quarterly revenues of $36.5M. Black Hills's net income of $134.3M is higher than RGC Resources's net income of $7.7M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.95x while RGC Resources's PE ratio is 16.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 1.88x versus 2.33x for RGC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BKH
    Black Hills
    1.88x 14.95x $805.2M $134.3M
    RGCO
    RGC Resources
    2.33x 16.25x $36.5M $7.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns BKH or SRE?

    Sempra has a net margin of 16.68% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 24.12%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9% beat Sempra's return on equity of 8.15%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BKH
    Black Hills
    36.24% $1.87 $8B
    SRE
    Sempra
    47.21% $1.39 $75.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About BKH or SRE?

    Black Hills has a consensus price target of $65.50, signalling upside risk potential of 11.74%. On the other hand Sempra has an analysts' consensus of $80.75 which suggests that it could grow by 2.33%. Given that Black Hills has higher upside potential than Sempra, analysts believe Black Hills is more attractive than Sempra.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BKH
    Black Hills
    1 3 0
    SRE
    Sempra
    7 10 0
  • Is BKH or SRE More Risky?

    Black Hills has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sempra has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.557%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BKH or SRE?

    Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.52%. Sempra offers a yield of 3.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Black Hills pays 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra pays out 53.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BKH or SRE?

    Black Hills quarterly revenues are $805.2M, which are smaller than Sempra quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Black Hills's net income of $134.3M is lower than Sempra's net income of $917M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.95x while Sempra's PE ratio is 17.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 1.88x versus 3.80x for Sempra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BKH
    Black Hills
    1.88x 14.95x $805.2M $134.3M
    SRE
    Sempra
    3.80x 17.34x $3.8B $917M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Tesla Stock Overvalued or a Buy for the Next Decade?
Is Tesla Stock Overvalued or a Buy for the Next Decade?

Shares of EV major Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) have experienced extreme volatility…

Is Apple Stock Undervalued or Overvalued?
Is Apple Stock Undervalued or Overvalued?

For many years, Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) was just about the perfect…

Where Will Palo Alto Networks Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Palo Alto Networks Stock Be in 5 Years?

You know those companies that just refuse to slow down…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
68
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
58
TNXP alert for May 28

Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding [TNXP] is up 1.57% over the past day.

Sell
37
ATS alert for May 28

ATS [ATS] is down 1.27% over the past day.

Buy
88
SMR alert for May 28

NuScale Power [SMR] is down 0.37% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock