RGCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Black Hills has a net margin of 19.31% compared to RGC Resources's net margin of 16.43%. RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.07% beat Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9%.

RGC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.93%. On the other hand Black Hills has an analysts' consensus of $65.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.92%. Given that RGC Resources has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe RGC Resources is more attractive than Black Hills.

RGC Resources has a beta of 0.309, which suggesting that the stock is 69.149% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Black Hills has a beta of 0.640, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.978%.

RGC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Black Hills offers a yield of 4.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. RGC Resources pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills pays out 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RGC Resources quarterly revenues are $27.3M, which are smaller than Black Hills quarterly revenues of $597.1M. RGC Resources's net income of $5.3M is lower than Black Hills's net income of $98.1M. Notably, RGC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.76x while Black Hills's PE ratio is 15.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RGC Resources is 2.43x versus 1.98x for Black Hills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Fortress Energy has a net margin of 19.31% compared to RGC Resources's net margin of -32.93%. RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.07% beat New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -13.91%.

RGC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.93%. On the other hand New Fortress Energy has an analysts' consensus of $12.71 which suggests that it could grow by 130.33%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than RGC Resources, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than RGC Resources.

RGC Resources has a beta of 0.309, which suggesting that the stock is 69.149% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.523, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.255%.

RGC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. New Fortress Energy offers a yield of 7.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. RGC Resources pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. New Fortress Energy pays out -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RGC Resources quarterly revenues are $27.3M, which are smaller than New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues of $679M. RGC Resources's net income of $5.3M is higher than New Fortress Energy's net income of -$223.6M. Notably, RGC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.76x while New Fortress Energy's PE ratio is 9.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RGC Resources is 2.43x versus 0.51x for New Fortress Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OPAL Fuels has a net margin of 19.31% compared to RGC Resources's net margin of 1.61%. RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.07% beat OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.4%.

RGC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.93%. On the other hand OPAL Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $4.97 which suggests that it could grow by 185.56%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than RGC Resources, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than RGC Resources.

RGC Resources has a beta of 0.309, which suggesting that the stock is 69.149% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

RGC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. OPAL Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RGC Resources pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. OPAL Fuels pays out 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

RGC Resources quarterly revenues are $27.3M, which are smaller than OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues of $80M. RGC Resources's net income of $5.3M is higher than OPAL Fuels's net income of $1.3M. Notably, RGC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.76x while OPAL Fuels's PE ratio is 87.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RGC Resources is 2.43x versus 0.16x for OPAL Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sempra has a net margin of 19.31% compared to RGC Resources's net margin of 17.99%. RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.07% beat Sempra's return on equity of 8.07%.

RGC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 29.93%. On the other hand Sempra has an analysts' consensus of $79.50 which suggests that it could grow by 6.45%. Given that RGC Resources has higher upside potential than Sempra, analysts believe RGC Resources is more attractive than Sempra.

RGC Resources has a beta of 0.309, which suggesting that the stock is 69.149% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sempra has a beta of 0.654, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.569%.

RGC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Sempra offers a yield of 3.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. RGC Resources pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra pays out 53.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RGC Resources quarterly revenues are $27.3M, which are smaller than Sempra quarterly revenues of $3.8B. RGC Resources's net income of $5.3M is lower than Sempra's net income of $676M. Notably, RGC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.76x while Sempra's PE ratio is 16.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RGC Resources is 2.43x versus 3.61x for Sempra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.