BC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Malibu Boats has a net margin of -7.14% compared to Brunswick's net margin of 1.18%. Brunswick's return on equity of 6.46% beat Malibu Boats's return on equity of -16.06%.

Brunswick has a consensus price target of $74.02, signalling upside risk potential of 54.01%. On the other hand Malibu Boats has an analysts' consensus of $41.14 which suggests that it could grow by 45.13%. Given that Brunswick has higher upside potential than Malibu Boats, analysts believe Brunswick is more attractive than Malibu Boats.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.147% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Malibu Boats has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.623%.

Brunswick has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Malibu Boats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brunswick pays 86.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Malibu Boats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Malibu Boats quarterly revenues of $200.3M. Brunswick's net income of -$82.5M is lower than Malibu Boats's net income of $2.4M. Notably, Brunswick's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.29x while Malibu Boats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick is 0.62x versus 0.78x for Malibu Boats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a net margin of -7.14% compared to Brunswick's net margin of 4.34%. Brunswick's return on equity of 6.46% beat MasterCraft Boat Holdings's return on equity of -3.6%.

Brunswick has a consensus price target of $74.02, signalling upside risk potential of 54.01%. On the other hand MasterCraft Boat Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $21.25 which suggests that it could grow by 26.87%. Given that Brunswick has higher upside potential than MasterCraft Boat Holdings, analysts believe Brunswick is more attractive than MasterCraft Boat Holdings.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.147% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasterCraft Boat Holdings has a beta of 1.345, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.51%.

Brunswick has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. MasterCraft Boat Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brunswick pays 86.32% of its earnings as a dividend. MasterCraft Boat Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than MasterCraft Boat Holdings quarterly revenues of $63.4M. Brunswick's net income of -$82.5M is lower than MasterCraft Boat Holdings's net income of $2.7M. Notably, Brunswick's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.29x while MasterCraft Boat Holdings's PE ratio is 42.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick is 0.62x versus 0.96x for MasterCraft Boat Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marine Products has a net margin of -7.14% compared to Brunswick's net margin of 8.92%. Brunswick's return on equity of 6.46% beat Marine Products's return on equity of 12.94%.

Brunswick has a consensus price target of $74.02, signalling upside risk potential of 54.01%. On the other hand Marine Products has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could fall by -4.99%. Given that Brunswick has higher upside potential than Marine Products, analysts believe Brunswick is more attractive than Marine Products.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.147% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marine Products has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.483%.

Brunswick has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Marine Products offers a yield of 6.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Brunswick pays 86.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Products pays out 244.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Marine Products's is not.

Brunswick quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Marine Products quarterly revenues of $47.8M. Brunswick's net income of -$82.5M is lower than Marine Products's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Brunswick's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.29x while Marine Products's PE ratio is 17.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick is 0.62x versus 1.20x for Marine Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Lighting Group has a net margin of -7.14% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -223.31%. Brunswick's return on equity of 6.46% beat US Lighting Group's return on equity of --.

Brunswick has a consensus price target of $74.02, signalling upside risk potential of 54.01%. On the other hand US Lighting Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brunswick has higher upside potential than US Lighting Group, analysts believe Brunswick is more attractive than US Lighting Group.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.147% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Lighting Group has a beta of 2.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.509%.

Brunswick has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. US Lighting Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brunswick pays 86.32% of its earnings as a dividend. US Lighting Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brunswick's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brunswick quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than US Lighting Group quarterly revenues of $151.8K. Brunswick's net income of -$82.5M is lower than US Lighting Group's net income of -$339K. Notably, Brunswick's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.29x while US Lighting Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brunswick is 0.62x versus 0.55x for US Lighting Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.