BANC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Heartland Financial USA has a net margin of 4.13% compared to Banc of California's net margin of 31.56%. Banc of California's return on equity of -14.06% beat Heartland Financial USA's return on equity of 4.3%.

Banc of California has a consensus price target of $18.80, signalling upside risk potential of 23.28%. On the other hand Heartland Financial USA has an analysts' consensus of $69.25 which suggests that it could grow by 13.77%. Given that Banc of California has higher upside potential than Heartland Financial USA, analysts believe Banc of California is more attractive than Heartland Financial USA.

Banc of California has a beta of 1.142, which suggesting that the stock is 14.232% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heartland Financial USA has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.566%.

Banc of California has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. Heartland Financial USA offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Banc of California pays -4.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Heartland Financial USA pays out 74.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Heartland Financial USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Banc of California quarterly revenues are $212.7M, which are larger than Heartland Financial USA quarterly revenues of $203.3M. Banc of California's net income of $8.8M is lower than Heartland Financial USA's net income of $64.2M. Notably, Banc of California's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Heartland Financial USA's PE ratio is 34.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Banc of California is 4.95x versus 4.33x for Heartland Financial USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red River Bancshares has a net margin of 4.13% compared to Banc of California's net margin of 31.74%. Banc of California's return on equity of -14.06% beat Red River Bancshares's return on equity of 10.95%.

Banc of California has a consensus price target of $18.80, signalling upside risk potential of 23.28%. On the other hand Red River Bancshares has an analysts' consensus of $68.50 which suggests that it could grow by 28.09%. Given that Red River Bancshares has higher upside potential than Banc of California, analysts believe Red River Bancshares is more attractive than Banc of California.

Banc of California has a beta of 1.142, which suggesting that the stock is 14.232% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red River Bancshares has a beta of 0.630, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.038%.

Banc of California has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. Red River Bancshares offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Banc of California pays -4.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Red River Bancshares pays out 6.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Red River Bancshares's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Banc of California quarterly revenues are $212.7M, which are larger than Red River Bancshares quarterly revenues of $27.6M. Banc of California's net income of $8.8M is higher than Red River Bancshares's net income of $8.8M. Notably, Banc of California's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Red River Bancshares's PE ratio is 11.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Banc of California is 4.95x versus 3.51x for Red River Bancshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SouthState has a net margin of 4.13% compared to Banc of California's net margin of 33.58%. Banc of California's return on equity of -14.06% beat SouthState's return on equity of 8.93%.

Banc of California has a consensus price target of $18.80, signalling upside risk potential of 23.28%. On the other hand SouthState has an analysts' consensus of $120.89 which suggests that it could grow by 24.63%. Given that SouthState has higher upside potential than Banc of California, analysts believe SouthState is more attractive than Banc of California.

Banc of California has a beta of 1.142, which suggesting that the stock is 14.232% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SouthState has a beta of 0.705, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.503%.

Banc of California has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. SouthState offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Banc of California pays -4.67% of its earnings as a dividend. SouthState pays out 31.6% of its earnings as a dividend. SouthState's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Banc of California quarterly revenues are $212.7M, which are smaller than SouthState quarterly revenues of $426.4M. Banc of California's net income of $8.8M is lower than SouthState's net income of $143.2M. Notably, Banc of California's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SouthState's PE ratio is 14.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Banc of California is 4.95x versus 4.51x for SouthState. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UMB Financial has a net margin of 4.13% compared to Banc of California's net margin of 30.13%. Banc of California's return on equity of -14.06% beat UMB Financial's return on equity of 12.39%.

Banc of California has a consensus price target of $18.80, signalling upside risk potential of 23.28%. On the other hand UMB Financial has an analysts' consensus of $138.89 which suggests that it could grow by 24.24%. Given that UMB Financial has higher upside potential than Banc of California, analysts believe UMB Financial is more attractive than Banc of California.

Banc of California has a beta of 1.142, which suggesting that the stock is 14.232% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UMB Financial has a beta of 0.822, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.778%.

Banc of California has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. UMB Financial offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Banc of California pays -4.67% of its earnings as a dividend. UMB Financial pays out 21.21% of its earnings as a dividend. UMB Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Banc of California quarterly revenues are $212.7M, which are smaller than UMB Financial quarterly revenues of $363.9M. Banc of California's net income of $8.8M is lower than UMB Financial's net income of $109.6M. Notably, Banc of California's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UMB Financial's PE ratio is 13.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Banc of California is 4.95x versus 3.89x for UMB Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.