RRBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 34.72% compared to Red River Bancshares's net margin of 27.38%. Red River Bancshares's return on equity of 11.49% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.66%.

Red River Bancshares has a consensus price target of $67.08, signalling upside risk potential of 18.69%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $32.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.38%. Given that Red River Bancshares has higher upside potential than Bar Harbor Bankshares, analysts believe Red River Bancshares is more attractive than Bar Harbor Bankshares.

Red River Bancshares has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.274% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.687, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.289%.

Red River Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 4.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Red River Bancshares pays 7.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 40.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red River Bancshares quarterly revenues are $29.8M, which are smaller than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $37.3M. Red River Bancshares's net income of $10.4M is higher than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $10.2M. Notably, Red River Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 10.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red River Bancshares is 3.45x versus 2.97x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings has a net margin of 34.72% compared to Red River Bancshares's net margin of 36.31%. Red River Bancshares's return on equity of 11.49% beat OptimumBank Holdings's return on equity of 15.42%.

Red River Bancshares has a consensus price target of $67.08, signalling upside risk potential of 18.69%. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.38%. Given that Red River Bancshares has higher upside potential than OptimumBank Holdings, analysts believe Red River Bancshares is more attractive than OptimumBank Holdings.

Red River Bancshares has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.274% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings has a beta of 0.455, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.491%.

Red River Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. OptimumBank Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red River Bancshares pays 7.25% of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red River Bancshares's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red River Bancshares quarterly revenues are $29.8M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.7M. Red River Bancshares's net income of $10.4M is higher than OptimumBank Holdings's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Red River Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while OptimumBank Holdings's PE ratio is 3.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red River Bancshares is 3.45x versus 1.18x for OptimumBank Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 34.72% compared to Red River Bancshares's net margin of 32.4%. Red River Bancshares's return on equity of 11.49% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

Red River Bancshares has a consensus price target of $67.08, signalling upside risk potential of 18.69%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $169.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.92%. Given that Red River Bancshares has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Red River Bancshares is more attractive than Park National.

Red River Bancshares has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.274% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.786, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.434%.

Red River Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Park National offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Red River Bancshares pays 7.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red River Bancshares quarterly revenues are $29.8M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. Red River Bancshares's net income of $10.4M is lower than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, Red River Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Park National's PE ratio is 16.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red River Bancshares is 3.45x versus 5.00x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 34.72% compared to Red River Bancshares's net margin of 24.09%. Red River Bancshares's return on equity of 11.49% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

Red River Bancshares has a consensus price target of $67.08, signalling upside risk potential of 18.69%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.89%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Red River Bancshares, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Red River Bancshares.

Red River Bancshares has a beta of 0.497, which suggesting that the stock is 50.274% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.218%.

Red River Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 4.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Red River Bancshares pays 7.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red River Bancshares quarterly revenues are $29.8M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. Red River Bancshares's net income of $10.4M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Red River Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 11.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red River Bancshares is 3.45x versus 2.86x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.