BALY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DraftKings has a net margin of -14.78% compared to Ballys's net margin of -9.68%. Ballys's return on equity of -162.78% beat DraftKings's return on equity of -50.16%.

Ballys has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.14%. On the other hand DraftKings has an analysts' consensus of $54.14 which suggests that it could grow by 58.09%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Ballys, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Ballys.

Ballys has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DraftKings has a beta of 1.895, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.505%.

Ballys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DraftKings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ballys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DraftKings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ballys quarterly revenues are $580.4M, which are smaller than DraftKings quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Ballys's net income of -$85.8M is higher than DraftKings's net income of -$134.9M. Notably, Ballys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DraftKings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ballys is 0.25x versus 3.53x for DraftKings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Full House Resorts has a net margin of -14.78% compared to Ballys's net margin of -16.86%. Ballys's return on equity of -162.78% beat Full House Resorts's return on equity of -68.49%.

Ballys has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.14%. On the other hand Full House Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 69.23%. Given that Full House Resorts has higher upside potential than Ballys, analysts believe Full House Resorts is more attractive than Ballys.

Ballys has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.703, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.342%.

Ballys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Full House Resorts offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ballys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Full House Resorts pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ballys quarterly revenues are $580.4M, which are larger than Full House Resorts quarterly revenues of $73M. Ballys's net income of -$85.8M is lower than Full House Resorts's net income of -$12.3M. Notably, Ballys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Full House Resorts's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ballys is 0.25x versus 0.39x for Full House Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golden Entertainment has a net margin of -14.78% compared to Ballys's net margin of 1.81%. Ballys's return on equity of -162.78% beat Golden Entertainment's return on equity of 9.63%.

Ballys has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.14%. On the other hand Golden Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $36.00 which suggests that it could grow by 37.25%. Given that Golden Entertainment has higher upside potential than Ballys, analysts believe Golden Entertainment is more attractive than Ballys.

Ballys has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Entertainment has a beta of 1.841, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.065%.

Ballys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Golden Entertainment offers a yield of 3.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Ballys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Entertainment pays out 42% of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Entertainment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ballys quarterly revenues are $580.4M, which are larger than Golden Entertainment quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Ballys's net income of -$85.8M is lower than Golden Entertainment's net income of $3M. Notably, Ballys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Golden Entertainment's PE ratio is 15.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ballys is 0.25x versus 1.17x for Golden Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Rock Resorts has a net margin of -14.78% compared to Ballys's net margin of 8.99%. Ballys's return on equity of -162.78% beat Red Rock Resorts's return on equity of 64.1%.

Ballys has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 22.14%. On the other hand Red Rock Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $50.42 which suggests that it could grow by 15.08%. Given that Ballys has higher upside potential than Red Rock Resorts, analysts believe Ballys is more attractive than Red Rock Resorts.

Ballys has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Rock Resorts has a beta of 1.645, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.529%.

Ballys has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Rock Resorts offers a yield of 2.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Ballys pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Rock Resorts pays out 76.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Rock Resorts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ballys quarterly revenues are $580.4M, which are larger than Red Rock Resorts quarterly revenues of $497.9M. Ballys's net income of -$85.8M is lower than Red Rock Resorts's net income of $44.7M. Notably, Ballys's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Red Rock Resorts's PE ratio is 16.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ballys is 0.25x versus 2.09x for Red Rock Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.