DKNG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Casinos has a net margin of -26.81% compared to DraftKings's net margin of -5.22%. DraftKings's return on equity of -43.02% beat Century Casinos's return on equity of -39.21%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $51.25, signalling upside risk potential of 35.15%. On the other hand Century Casinos has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 81.96%. Given that Century Casinos has higher upside potential than DraftKings, analysts believe Century Casinos is more attractive than DraftKings.

DraftKings has a beta of 1.868, which suggesting that the stock is 86.771% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Casinos has a beta of 2.596, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 159.595%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Casinos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Casinos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Century Casinos quarterly revenues of $155.7M. DraftKings's net income of -$293.7M is lower than Century Casinos's net income of -$8.1M. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Century Casinos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 4.01x versus 0.17x for Century Casinos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Everi Holdings has a net margin of -26.81% compared to DraftKings's net margin of -1.37%. DraftKings's return on equity of -43.02% beat Everi Holdings's return on equity of 5.44%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $51.25, signalling upside risk potential of 35.15%. On the other hand Everi Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $13.80 which suggests that it could grow by 5.26%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Everi Holdings, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Everi Holdings.

DraftKings has a beta of 1.868, which suggesting that the stock is 86.771% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everi Holdings has a beta of 2.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.612%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Everi Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everi Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Everi Holdings quarterly revenues of $187.9M. DraftKings's net income of -$293.7M is lower than Everi Holdings's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Everi Holdings's PE ratio is 89.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 4.01x versus 1.55x for Everi Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Light & Wonder has a net margin of -26.81% compared to DraftKings's net margin of 7.83%. DraftKings's return on equity of -43.02% beat Light & Wonder's return on equity of 33.6%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $51.25, signalling upside risk potential of 35.15%. On the other hand Light & Wonder has an analysts' consensus of $109.94 which suggests that it could grow by 27.8%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Light & Wonder, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Light & Wonder.

DraftKings has a beta of 1.868, which suggesting that the stock is 86.771% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.711, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.06%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Light & Wonder offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Light & Wonder pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Light & Wonder quarterly revenues of $817M. DraftKings's net income of -$293.7M is lower than Light & Wonder's net income of $64M. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Light & Wonder's PE ratio is 26.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 4.01x versus 2.50x for Light & Wonder. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rush Street Interactive has a net margin of -26.81% compared to DraftKings's net margin of 0.51%. DraftKings's return on equity of -43.02% beat Rush Street Interactive's return on equity of -0.79%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $51.25, signalling upside risk potential of 35.15%. On the other hand Rush Street Interactive has an analysts' consensus of $14.38 which suggests that it could grow by 4.62%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Rush Street Interactive, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Rush Street Interactive.

DraftKings has a beta of 1.868, which suggesting that the stock is 86.771% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rush Street Interactive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rush Street Interactive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Street Interactive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Rush Street Interactive quarterly revenues of $232.1M. DraftKings's net income of -$293.7M is lower than Rush Street Interactive's net income of $1.2M. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rush Street Interactive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 4.01x versus 1.83x for Rush Street Interactive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.