BABA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

JD.com has a net margin of 17.54% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of 2.84%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 11.03% beat JD.com's return on equity of 13.91%.

Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of $164.54, signalling upside risk potential of 28.89%. On the other hand JD.com has an analysts' consensus of $54.10 which suggests that it could grow by 58.83%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding.

Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 75.634% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JD.com has a beta of 0.560, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.99%.

Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.57%. JD.com offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com pays out 19.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $38.9B, which are smaller than JD.com quarterly revenues of $48.2B. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.8B is higher than JD.com's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.45x while JD.com's PE ratio is 9.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 2.28x versus 0.32x for JD.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PDD Holdings has a net margin of 17.54% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of 24.81%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 11.03% beat PDD Holdings's return on equity of 44.83%.

Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of $164.54, signalling upside risk potential of 28.89%. On the other hand PDD Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $149.97 which suggests that it could grow by 34.72%. Given that PDD Holdings has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding, analysts believe PDD Holdings is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding.

Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 75.634% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PDD Holdings has a beta of 0.574, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.647%.

Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.57%. PDD Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. PDD Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $38.9B, which are larger than PDD Holdings quarterly revenues of $15.4B. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.8B is higher than PDD Holdings's net income of $3.8B. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.45x while PDD Holdings's PE ratio is 10.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 2.28x versus 3.00x for PDD Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 17.54% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of -42.85%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 11.03% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of $164.54, signalling upside risk potential of 28.89%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.19 which suggests that it could grow by 5.39%. Given that Alibaba Group Holding has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 75.634% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.57%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $38.9B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.8B is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.45x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 2.28x versus 2.75x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 17.54% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of 2.12%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 11.03% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of $164.54, signalling upside risk potential of 28.89%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $289.44 which suggests that it could grow by 5.12%. Given that Alibaba Group Holding has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding is more attractive than Tesla.

Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 75.634% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.57%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $38.9B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.8B is higher than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.45x while Tesla's PE ratio is 151.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 2.28x versus 10.09x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.