AWI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EMCOR Group has a net margin of 18.06% compared to Armstrong World Industries's net margin of 6.22%. Armstrong World Industries's return on equity of 38.46% beat EMCOR Group's return on equity of 37.5%.

Armstrong World Industries has a consensus price target of $160.75, signalling upside risk potential of 7.12%. On the other hand EMCOR Group has an analysts' consensus of $485.40 which suggests that it could grow by 12.08%. Given that EMCOR Group has higher upside potential than Armstrong World Industries, analysts believe EMCOR Group is more attractive than Armstrong World Industries.

Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.749%.

Armstrong World Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.78%. EMCOR Group offers a yield of 0.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Armstrong World Industries pays 19.1% of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Armstrong World Industries quarterly revenues are $382.7M, which are smaller than EMCOR Group quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Armstrong World Industries's net income of $69.1M is lower than EMCOR Group's net income of $240.7M. Notably, Armstrong World Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.01x while EMCOR Group's PE ratio is 19.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Armstrong World Industries is 4.39x versus 1.34x for EMCOR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fluor has a net margin of 18.06% compared to Armstrong World Industries's net margin of -6.05%. Armstrong World Industries's return on equity of 38.46% beat Fluor's return on equity of 64.65%.

Armstrong World Industries has a consensus price target of $160.75, signalling upside risk potential of 7.12%. On the other hand Fluor has an analysts' consensus of $46.35 which suggests that it could grow by 32.01%. Given that Fluor has higher upside potential than Armstrong World Industries, analysts believe Fluor is more attractive than Armstrong World Industries.

Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor has a beta of 1.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.947%.

Armstrong World Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.78%. Fluor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Armstrong World Industries pays 19.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Armstrong World Industries quarterly revenues are $382.7M, which are smaller than Fluor quarterly revenues of $4B. Armstrong World Industries's net income of $69.1M is higher than Fluor's net income of -$241M. Notably, Armstrong World Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.01x while Fluor's PE ratio is 3.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Armstrong World Industries is 4.39x versus 0.37x for Fluor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Identiv has a net margin of 18.06% compared to Armstrong World Industries's net margin of -5.3%. Armstrong World Industries's return on equity of 38.46% beat Identiv's return on equity of 71.9%.

Armstrong World Industries has a consensus price target of $160.75, signalling upside risk potential of 7.12%. On the other hand Identiv has an analysts' consensus of $6.17 which suggests that it could grow by 92.71%. Given that Identiv has higher upside potential than Armstrong World Industries, analysts believe Identiv is more attractive than Armstrong World Industries.

Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Identiv has a beta of 1.507, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.719%.

Armstrong World Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.78%. Identiv offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Armstrong World Industries pays 19.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Identiv pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Armstrong World Industries quarterly revenues are $382.7M, which are larger than Identiv quarterly revenues of $6.7M. Armstrong World Industries's net income of $69.1M is higher than Identiv's net income of -$355K. Notably, Armstrong World Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.01x while Identiv's PE ratio is 1.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Armstrong World Industries is 4.39x versus 1.78x for Identiv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Construction Partners has a net margin of 18.06% compared to Armstrong World Industries's net margin of -0.54%. Armstrong World Industries's return on equity of 38.46% beat Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.39%.

Armstrong World Industries has a consensus price target of $160.75, signalling upside risk potential of 7.12%. On the other hand Construction Partners has an analysts' consensus of $103.30 which suggests that it could grow by 13.32%. Given that Construction Partners has higher upside potential than Armstrong World Industries, analysts believe Construction Partners is more attractive than Armstrong World Industries.

Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Construction Partners has a beta of 0.869, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.138%.

Armstrong World Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.78%. Construction Partners offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Armstrong World Industries pays 19.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Construction Partners pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Armstrong World Industries quarterly revenues are $382.7M, which are smaller than Construction Partners quarterly revenues of $561.6M. Armstrong World Industries's net income of $69.1M is higher than Construction Partners's net income of -$3.1M. Notably, Armstrong World Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.01x while Construction Partners's PE ratio is 85.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Armstrong World Industries is 4.39x versus 2.42x for Construction Partners. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.