Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Buy
66
AWI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$141.78
Seasonality move
:
3.33%
Day range:
$139.87 - $144.30
52-week range:
$96.69 - $164.40
Dividend yield:
0.81%
P/E ratio:
24.86x
P/S ratio:
4.47x
P/B ratio:
8.57x
Volume:
151.8K
Avg. volume:
177.8K
1-year change:
44.4%
Market cap:
$6.1B
Revenue:
$1.3B
EPS (TTM):
$5.67
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AWI
Armstrong World Industries
|
$351.5M | $1.39 | 12.51% | 29.71% | $151.50 |
|
ADMQ
ADM Endeavors
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BLD
TopBuild
|
$1.3B | $5.03 | 2.03% | 10.15% | $438.73 |
|
MAS
Masco
|
$1.8B | $0.88 | -2.19% | 3.32% | $86.00 |
|
OTIS
Otis Worldwide
|
$3.6B | $0.95 | 1.69% | 20.9% | $101.45 |
|
PWR
Quanta Services
|
$6.6B | $2.62 | 14.26% | 84.74% | $329.62 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AWI
Armstrong World Industries
|
$140.98 | $151.50 | $6.1B | 24.86x | $0.31 | 0.81% | 4.47x |
|
ADMQ
ADM Endeavors
|
$0.04 | -- | $6.7M | 295.86x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.17x |
|
BLD
TopBuild
|
$315.54 | $438.73 | $9.3B | 15.92x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.86x |
|
MAS
Masco
|
$71.70 | $86.00 | $15.5B | 19.07x | $0.29 | 1.62% | 2.01x |
|
OTIS
Otis Worldwide
|
$92.12 | $101.45 | $36.8B | 22.97x | $0.39 | 1.64% | 2.64x |
|
PWR
Quanta Services
|
$319.81 | $329.62 | $47.2B | 59.01x | $0.10 | 0.12% | 2.09x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AWI
Armstrong World Industries
|
43.66% | 1.930 | 9.68% | 0.95x |
|
ADMQ
ADM Endeavors
|
52.55% | 1.900 | 39.63% | 1.13x |
|
BLD
TopBuild
|
39.61% | 2.207 | 11.55% | 1.44x |
|
MAS
Masco
|
103.08% | 1.764 | 16.07% | 1.11x |
|
OTIS
Otis Worldwide
|
307.49% | 1.809 | 17.44% | 0.64x |
|
PWR
Quanta Services
|
39.87% | 1.863 | 10.65% | 1.11x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AWI
Armstrong World Industries
|
$164.1M | $86.5M | 20.19% | 39.11% | 29.57% | $77.1M |
|
ADMQ
ADM Endeavors
|
$565.3K | $161.4K | 0.51% | 0.86% | 7.87% | -$300.9K |
|
BLD
TopBuild
|
$421.8M | $244M | 16.11% | 25.44% | 17.94% | $219.9M |
|
MAS
Masco
|
$725M | $357M | 26.61% | 543.85% | 13.77% | $378M |
|
OTIS
Otis Worldwide
|
$1.1B | $363M | 68.98% | -- | 10.23% | $362M |
|
PWR
Quanta Services
|
$1B | $418.3M | 7.73% | 12.54% | 6.8% | $527.4M |
Armstrong World Industries vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AWI or ADMQ?
ADM Endeavors has a net margin of 19.89% compared to Armstrong World Industries's net margin of 5.81%. Armstrong World Industries's return on equity of 39.11% beat ADM Endeavors's return on equity of 0.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AWIArmstrong World Industries42.45% $1.75 $1.3B ADMQADM Endeavors26.1% $0.00 $5.8M -
What do Analysts Say About AWI or ADMQ?
Armstrong World Industries has a consensus price target of $151.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.46%. On the other hand ADM Endeavors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Armstrong World Industries has higher upside potential than ADM Endeavors, analysts believe Armstrong World Industries is more attractive than ADM Endeavors.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AWIArmstrong World Industries2 4 0 ADMQADM Endeavors0 0 0 -
Is AWI or ADMQ More Risky?
Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.146% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ADM Endeavors has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWI or ADMQ?
Armstrong World Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. ADM Endeavors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Armstrong World Industries pays 20.96% of its earnings as a dividend. ADM Endeavors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AWI or ADMQ?
Armstrong World Industries quarterly revenues are $386.6M, which are larger than ADM Endeavors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Armstrong World Industries's net income of $76.9M is higher than ADM Endeavors's net income of $125.8K. Notably, Armstrong World Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.86x while ADM Endeavors's PE ratio is 295.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Armstrong World Industries is 4.47x versus 1.17x for ADM Endeavors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AWIArmstrong World Industries4.47x 24.86x $386.6M $76.9M ADMQADM Endeavors1.17x 295.86x $2.2M $125.8K
-
Which has Higher Returns AWI or BLD?
TopBuild has a net margin of 19.89% compared to Armstrong World Industries's net margin of 12.3%. Armstrong World Industries's return on equity of 39.11% beat TopBuild's return on equity of 25.44%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AWIArmstrong World Industries42.45% $1.75 $1.3B BLDTopBuild30.72% $5.65 $3.5B -
What do Analysts Say About AWI or BLD?
Armstrong World Industries has a consensus price target of $151.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.46%. On the other hand TopBuild has an analysts' consensus of $438.73 which suggests that it could grow by 39.04%. Given that TopBuild has higher upside potential than Armstrong World Industries, analysts believe TopBuild is more attractive than Armstrong World Industries.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AWIArmstrong World Industries2 4 0 BLDTopBuild7 3 0 -
Is AWI or BLD More Risky?
Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.146% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TopBuild has a beta of 1.839, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.895%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWI or BLD?
Armstrong World Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. TopBuild offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Armstrong World Industries pays 20.96% of its earnings as a dividend. TopBuild pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AWI or BLD?
Armstrong World Industries quarterly revenues are $386.6M, which are smaller than TopBuild quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Armstrong World Industries's net income of $76.9M is lower than TopBuild's net income of $169M. Notably, Armstrong World Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.86x while TopBuild's PE ratio is 15.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Armstrong World Industries is 4.47x versus 1.86x for TopBuild. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AWIArmstrong World Industries4.47x 24.86x $386.6M $76.9M BLDTopBuild1.86x 15.92x $1.4B $169M
-
Which has Higher Returns AWI or MAS?
Masco has a net margin of 19.89% compared to Armstrong World Industries's net margin of 8.42%. Armstrong World Industries's return on equity of 39.11% beat Masco's return on equity of 543.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AWIArmstrong World Industries42.45% $1.75 $1.3B MASMasco36.56% $0.77 $3.1B -
What do Analysts Say About AWI or MAS?
Armstrong World Industries has a consensus price target of $151.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.46%. On the other hand Masco has an analysts' consensus of $86.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.95%. Given that Masco has higher upside potential than Armstrong World Industries, analysts believe Masco is more attractive than Armstrong World Industries.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AWIArmstrong World Industries2 4 0 MASMasco5 15 0 -
Is AWI or MAS More Risky?
Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.146% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Masco has a beta of 1.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.435%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWI or MAS?
Armstrong World Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Masco offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Armstrong World Industries pays 20.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Masco pays out 28.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AWI or MAS?
Armstrong World Industries quarterly revenues are $386.6M, which are smaller than Masco quarterly revenues of $2B. Armstrong World Industries's net income of $76.9M is lower than Masco's net income of $167M. Notably, Armstrong World Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.86x while Masco's PE ratio is 19.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Armstrong World Industries is 4.47x versus 2.01x for Masco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AWIArmstrong World Industries4.47x 24.86x $386.6M $76.9M MASMasco2.01x 19.07x $2B $167M
-
Which has Higher Returns AWI or OTIS?
Otis Worldwide has a net margin of 19.89% compared to Armstrong World Industries's net margin of 15.22%. Armstrong World Industries's return on equity of 39.11% beat Otis Worldwide's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AWIArmstrong World Industries42.45% $1.75 $1.3B OTISOtis Worldwide30.38% $1.34 $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About AWI or OTIS?
Armstrong World Industries has a consensus price target of $151.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.46%. On the other hand Otis Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of $101.45 which suggests that it could grow by 10.12%. Given that Otis Worldwide has higher upside potential than Armstrong World Industries, analysts believe Otis Worldwide is more attractive than Armstrong World Industries.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AWIArmstrong World Industries2 4 0 OTISOtis Worldwide4 10 1 -
Is AWI or OTIS More Risky?
Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.146% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Otis Worldwide has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWI or OTIS?
Armstrong World Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Otis Worldwide offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Armstrong World Industries pays 20.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Otis Worldwide pays out 38.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AWI or OTIS?
Armstrong World Industries quarterly revenues are $386.6M, which are smaller than Otis Worldwide quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Armstrong World Industries's net income of $76.9M is lower than Otis Worldwide's net income of $540M. Notably, Armstrong World Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.86x while Otis Worldwide's PE ratio is 22.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Armstrong World Industries is 4.47x versus 2.64x for Otis Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AWIArmstrong World Industries4.47x 24.86x $386.6M $76.9M OTISOtis Worldwide2.64x 22.97x $3.5B $540M
-
Which has Higher Returns AWI or PWR?
Quanta Services has a net margin of 19.89% compared to Armstrong World Industries's net margin of 4.52%. Armstrong World Industries's return on equity of 39.11% beat Quanta Services's return on equity of 12.54%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AWIArmstrong World Industries42.45% $1.75 $1.3B PWRQuanta Services15.59% $1.95 $11.8B -
What do Analysts Say About AWI or PWR?
Armstrong World Industries has a consensus price target of $151.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.46%. On the other hand Quanta Services has an analysts' consensus of $329.62 which suggests that it could grow by 5.36%. Given that Armstrong World Industries has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, analysts believe Armstrong World Industries is more attractive than Quanta Services.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AWIArmstrong World Industries2 4 0 PWRQuanta Services15 5 1 -
Is AWI or PWR More Risky?
Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.181, which suggesting that the stock is 18.146% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanta Services has a beta of 1.062, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.178%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AWI or PWR?
Armstrong World Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Quanta Services offers a yield of 0.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Armstrong World Industries pays 20.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services pays out 6.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AWI or PWR?
Armstrong World Industries quarterly revenues are $386.6M, which are smaller than Quanta Services quarterly revenues of $6.5B. Armstrong World Industries's net income of $76.9M is lower than Quanta Services's net income of $293.2M. Notably, Armstrong World Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.86x while Quanta Services's PE ratio is 59.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Armstrong World Industries is 4.47x versus 2.09x for Quanta Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AWIArmstrong World Industries4.47x 24.86x $386.6M $76.9M PWRQuanta Services2.09x 59.01x $6.5B $293.2M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is down 0.1% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 3.15% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 8.37% over the past day.
