AVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Exelon has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Avista's net margin of 13.52%. Avista's return on equity of 7.32% beat Exelon's return on equity of 10.16%.

Avista has a consensus price target of $42.20, signalling upside risk potential of 8.71%. On the other hand Exelon has an analysts' consensus of $46.91 which suggests that it could grow by 6.84%. Given that Avista has higher upside potential than Exelon, analysts believe Avista is more attractive than Exelon.

Avista has a beta of 0.416, which suggesting that the stock is 58.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exelon has a beta of 0.437, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.261%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.97%. Exelon offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Avista pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Exelon pays out 61.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $617M, which are smaller than Exelon quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Avista's net income of $79M is lower than Exelon's net income of $908M. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.52x while Exelon's PE ratio is 16.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.58x versus 1.86x for Exelon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSource has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Avista's net margin of 21.75%. Avista's return on equity of 7.32% beat NiSource's return on equity of 8.44%.

Avista has a consensus price target of $42.20, signalling upside risk potential of 8.71%. On the other hand NiSource has an analysts' consensus of $42.63 which suggests that it could grow by 9.26%. Given that NiSource has higher upside potential than Avista, analysts believe NiSource is more attractive than Avista.

Avista has a beta of 0.416, which suggesting that the stock is 58.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSource has a beta of 0.534, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.601%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.97%. NiSource offers a yield of 2.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Avista pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NiSource pays out 64.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $617M, which are smaller than NiSource quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Avista's net income of $79M is lower than NiSource's net income of $474.8M. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.52x while NiSource's PE ratio is 20.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.58x versus 3.04x for NiSource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NorthWestern Energy Group has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Avista's net margin of 16.49%. Avista's return on equity of 7.32% beat NorthWestern Energy Group's return on equity of 8.31%.

Avista has a consensus price target of $42.20, signalling upside risk potential of 8.71%. On the other hand NorthWestern Energy Group has an analysts' consensus of $61.39 which suggests that it could grow by 11.66%. Given that NorthWestern Energy Group has higher upside potential than Avista, analysts believe NorthWestern Energy Group is more attractive than Avista.

Avista has a beta of 0.416, which suggesting that the stock is 58.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NorthWestern Energy Group has a beta of 0.402, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.754%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.97%. NorthWestern Energy Group offers a yield of 4.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Avista pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NorthWestern Energy Group pays out 70.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $617M, which are larger than NorthWestern Energy Group quarterly revenues of $466.6M. Avista's net income of $79M is higher than NorthWestern Energy Group's net income of $76.9M. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.52x while NorthWestern Energy Group's PE ratio is 14.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.58x versus 2.24x for NorthWestern Energy Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OGE Energy has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Avista's net margin of 8.39%. Avista's return on equity of 7.32% beat OGE Energy's return on equity of 10.65%.

Avista has a consensus price target of $42.20, signalling upside risk potential of 8.71%. On the other hand OGE Energy has an analysts' consensus of $44.69 which suggests that it could grow by 1.02%. Given that Avista has higher upside potential than OGE Energy, analysts believe Avista is more attractive than OGE Energy.

Avista has a beta of 0.416, which suggesting that the stock is 58.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OGE Energy has a beta of 0.610, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.033%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.97%. OGE Energy offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Avista pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. OGE Energy pays out 76.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $617M, which are smaller than OGE Energy quarterly revenues of $747.7M. Avista's net income of $79M is higher than OGE Energy's net income of $62.7M. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.52x while OGE Energy's PE ratio is 18.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.58x versus 2.84x for OGE Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.