ASH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of -40.74% compared to Ashland's net margin of -1.23%. Ashland's return on equity of -0.79% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48%.

Ashland has a consensus price target of $80.11, signalling upside risk potential of 35.12%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ashland has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Ashland is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Ashland has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.173% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.390, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.042%.

Ashland has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Ashland pays 46.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ashland quarterly revenues are $405M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $94.1M. Ashland's net income of -$165M is lower than Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Ashland's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.24x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 18.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ashland is 1.42x versus 0.23x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingevity has a net margin of -40.74% compared to Ashland's net margin of 5.56%. Ashland's return on equity of -0.79% beat Ingevity's return on equity of -113.59%.

Ashland has a consensus price target of $80.11, signalling upside risk potential of 35.12%. On the other hand Ingevity has an analysts' consensus of $58.50 which suggests that it could grow by 47.77%. Given that Ingevity has higher upside potential than Ashland, analysts believe Ingevity is more attractive than Ashland.

Ashland has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.173% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingevity has a beta of 1.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.443%.

Ashland has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Ingevity offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ashland pays 46.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingevity pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ashland's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ashland quarterly revenues are $405M, which are larger than Ingevity quarterly revenues of $298.8M. Ashland's net income of -$165M is lower than Ingevity's net income of $16.6M. Notably, Ashland's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.24x while Ingevity's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ashland is 1.42x versus 1.02x for Ingevity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of -40.74% compared to Ashland's net margin of --. Ashland's return on equity of -0.79% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Ashland has a consensus price target of $80.11, signalling upside risk potential of 35.12%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 278.38%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Ashland, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Ashland.

Ashland has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.173% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.856, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.622%.

Ashland has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ashland pays 46.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ashland's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ashland quarterly revenues are $405M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Ashland's net income of -$165M is lower than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Ashland's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.24x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ashland is 1.42x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -40.74% compared to Ashland's net margin of --. Ashland's return on equity of -0.79% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Ashland has a consensus price target of $80.11, signalling upside risk potential of 35.12%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 150%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Ashland, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Ashland.

Ashland has a beta of 0.698, which suggesting that the stock is 30.173% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.767, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.283%.

Ashland has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ashland pays 46.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ashland's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ashland quarterly revenues are $405M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Ashland's net income of -$165M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Ashland's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.24x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ashland is 1.42x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.