ADNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BorgWarner has a net margin of -9.28% compared to Adient PLC's net margin of 4.47%. Adient PLC's return on equity of -11.59% beat BorgWarner's return on equity of 4.77%.

Adient PLC has a consensus price target of $21.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.78%. On the other hand BorgWarner has an analysts' consensus of $37.77 which suggests that it could grow by 14.21%. Given that Adient PLC has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe Adient PLC is more attractive than BorgWarner.

Adient PLC has a beta of 1.636, which suggesting that the stock is 63.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BorgWarner has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.254%.

Adient PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BorgWarner offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Adient PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner pays out 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adient PLC quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than BorgWarner quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Adient PLC's net income of -$335M is lower than BorgWarner's net income of $157M. Notably, Adient PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 629.00x while BorgWarner's PE ratio is 26.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adient PLC is 0.11x versus 0.52x for BorgWarner. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of -9.28% compared to Adient PLC's net margin of 4.26%. Adient PLC's return on equity of -11.59% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 7.32%.

Adient PLC has a consensus price target of $21.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.78%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 73.61%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Adient PLC, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Adient PLC.

Adient PLC has a beta of 1.636, which suggesting that the stock is 63.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.574, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.396%.

Adient PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Adient PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adient PLC quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $167.1M. Adient PLC's net income of -$335M is lower than China Automotive Systems's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Adient PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 629.00x while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 4.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adient PLC is 0.11x versus 0.19x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Holley has a net margin of -9.28% compared to Adient PLC's net margin of 1.84%. Adient PLC's return on equity of -11.59% beat Holley's return on equity of -5.46%.

Adient PLC has a consensus price target of $21.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.78%. On the other hand Holley has an analysts' consensus of $3.54 which suggests that it could grow by 61.03%. Given that Holley has higher upside potential than Adient PLC, analysts believe Holley is more attractive than Adient PLC.

Adient PLC has a beta of 1.636, which suggesting that the stock is 63.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Holley has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Adient PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Holley offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adient PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Holley pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Adient PLC quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Holley quarterly revenues of $153M. Adient PLC's net income of -$335M is lower than Holley's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Adient PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 629.00x while Holley's PE ratio is 22.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adient PLC is 0.11x versus 0.41x for Holley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -9.28% compared to Adient PLC's net margin of -3528.43%. Adient PLC's return on equity of -11.59% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Adient PLC has a consensus price target of $21.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.78%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 37.93%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Adient PLC, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Adient PLC.

Adient PLC has a beta of 1.636, which suggesting that the stock is 63.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.738, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 173.793%.

Adient PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adient PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Adient PLC quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Adient PLC's net income of -$335M is lower than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Adient PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 629.00x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adient PLC is 0.11x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.