Financhill
Sell
36

ACCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$5.12
Seasonality move :
1.63%
Day range:
$5.04 - $5.16
52-week range:
$4.37 - $6.62
Dividend yield:
5.87%
P/E ratio:
10.48x
P/S ratio:
0.29x
P/B ratio:
0.77x
Volume:
548.9K
Avg. volume:
637.1K
1-year change:
-20.28%
Market cap:
$474.6M
Revenue:
$1.8B
EPS (TTM):
-$1.89

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
ACCO
ACCO Brands
$455.1M $0.41 -6.87% 53.33% $10.83
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
-- -- -- -- --
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
-- -- -- -- --
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
-- -- -- -- --
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
-- -- -- -- --
PH
Parker Hannifin
$4.8B $6.24 0% 19.44% $738.41
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
ACCO
ACCO Brands
$5.11 $10.83 $474.6M 10.48x $0.08 5.87% 0.29x
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
$15.80 -- $15.3M -- $0.03 2.09% 0.51x
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
$4.54 -- $59M 3.31x $0.00 0% 0.68x
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
$27.68 -- $77.2M 11.25x $0.25 3.16% 1.75x
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
$4.25 -- $4.7M -- $0.00 0% 0.02x
PH
Parker Hannifin
$641.50 $738.41 $82.6B 28.97x $1.63 0.99% 4.19x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
ACCO
ACCO Brands
59.63% 2.088 177.92% 0.86x
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
-- -0.163 -- 2.68x
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
42.08% -0.753 40.73% 1.55x
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
-- -0.251 -- 2.01x
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
97.85% 1.455 1339.66% 0.16x
PH
Parker Hannifin
44.15% 1.303 12.53% 0.46x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
ACCO
ACCO Brands
$136.9M $33M -10.89% -25.11% 6.53% $89.2M
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
$695K -$823.6K -13.89% -13.89% -11.82% -$368.9K
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
$4.2M $1.5M 43.19% 84.62% 7.61% $586.9K
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
$2.8M $1.7M 15.95% 15.95% 16.46% $724.8K
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
$8.5M -$12.8M -108.68% -281.97% -77.39% $2.8M
PH
Parker Hannifin
$1.8B $957.5M 12.62% 24.73% 20.15% $648.7M

ACCO Brands vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns ACCO or CVR?

    Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 2.21% compared to ACCO Brands's net margin of -20.76%. ACCO Brands's return on equity of -25.11% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACCO
    ACCO Brands
    32.53% $0.09 $1.5B
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    9.97% -$1.50 $23.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACCO or CVR?

    ACCO Brands has a consensus price target of $10.83, signalling upside risk potential of 112%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ACCO Brands has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe ACCO Brands is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACCO
    ACCO Brands
    1 0 0
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0 0 0
  • Is ACCO or CVR More Risky?

    ACCO Brands has a beta of 1.684, which suggesting that the stock is 68.378% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.157, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.259%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACCO or CVR?

    ACCO Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. ACCO Brands pays -130.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -14.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACCO or CVR?

    ACCO Brands quarterly revenues are $420.9M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. ACCO Brands's net income of $9.3M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, ACCO Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.48x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACCO Brands is 0.29x versus 0.51x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACCO
    ACCO Brands
    0.29x 10.48x $420.9M $9.3M
    CVR
    Chicago Rivet & Machine
    0.51x -- $7M -$1.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACCO or CVU?

    CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 2.21% compared to ACCO Brands's net margin of 3.86%. ACCO Brands's return on equity of -25.11% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 84.62%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACCO
    ACCO Brands
    32.53% $0.09 $1.5B
    CVU
    CPI Aerostructures
    21.73% $0.06 $43.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACCO or CVU?

    ACCO Brands has a consensus price target of $10.83, signalling upside risk potential of 112%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -11.89%. Given that ACCO Brands has higher upside potential than CPI Aerostructures, analysts believe ACCO Brands is more attractive than CPI Aerostructures.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACCO
    ACCO Brands
    1 0 0
    CVU
    CPI Aerostructures
    0 0 0
  • Is ACCO or CVU More Risky?

    ACCO Brands has a beta of 1.684, which suggesting that the stock is 68.378% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.339%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACCO or CVU?

    ACCO Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ACCO Brands pays -130.73% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACCO or CVU?

    ACCO Brands quarterly revenues are $420.9M, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $19.4M. ACCO Brands's net income of $9.3M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of $749.7K. Notably, ACCO Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.48x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 3.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACCO Brands is 0.29x versus 0.68x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACCO
    ACCO Brands
    0.29x 10.48x $420.9M $9.3M
    CVU
    CPI Aerostructures
    0.68x 3.31x $19.4M $749.7K
  • Which has Higher Returns ACCO or ESP?

    Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a net margin of 2.21% compared to ACCO Brands's net margin of 15.31%. ACCO Brands's return on equity of -25.11% beat Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's return on equity of 15.95%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACCO
    ACCO Brands
    32.53% $0.09 $1.5B
    ESP
    Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
    26.82% $0.61 $42.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACCO or ESP?

    ACCO Brands has a consensus price target of $10.83, signalling upside risk potential of 112%. On the other hand Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -9.68%. Given that ACCO Brands has higher upside potential than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics, analysts believe ACCO Brands is more attractive than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACCO
    ACCO Brands
    1 0 0
    ESP
    Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
    0 0 0
  • Is ACCO or ESP More Risky?

    ACCO Brands has a beta of 1.684, which suggesting that the stock is 68.378% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a beta of 0.145, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.51%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACCO or ESP?

    ACCO Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. ACCO Brands pays -130.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics pays out 28.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACCO or ESP?

    ACCO Brands quarterly revenues are $420.9M, which are larger than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics quarterly revenues of $10.4M. ACCO Brands's net income of $9.3M is higher than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's net income of $1.6M. Notably, ACCO Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.48x while Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's PE ratio is 11.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACCO Brands is 0.29x versus 1.75x for Espey Manufacturing & Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACCO
    ACCO Brands
    0.29x 10.48x $420.9M $9.3M
    ESP
    Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
    1.75x 11.25x $10.4M $1.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACCO or GPUS?

    Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 2.21% compared to ACCO Brands's net margin of -82.25%. ACCO Brands's return on equity of -25.11% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACCO
    ACCO Brands
    32.53% $0.09 $1.5B
    GPUS
    Hyperscale Data
    27.51% -$24.85 $126.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About ACCO or GPUS?

    ACCO Brands has a consensus price target of $10.83, signalling upside risk potential of 112%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12352865.88%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than ACCO Brands, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than ACCO Brands.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACCO
    ACCO Brands
    1 0 0
    GPUS
    Hyperscale Data
    0 0 0
  • Is ACCO or GPUS More Risky?

    ACCO Brands has a beta of 1.684, which suggesting that the stock is 68.378% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.435, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 243.524%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACCO or GPUS?

    ACCO Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ACCO Brands pays -130.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -0.6% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACCO or GPUS?

    ACCO Brands quarterly revenues are $420.9M, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. ACCO Brands's net income of $9.3M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, ACCO Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.48x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACCO Brands is 0.29x versus 0.02x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACCO
    ACCO Brands
    0.29x 10.48x $420.9M $9.3M
    GPUS
    Hyperscale Data
    0.02x -- $31.1M -$25.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns ACCO or PH?

    Parker Hannifin has a net margin of 2.21% compared to ACCO Brands's net margin of 14.24%. ACCO Brands's return on equity of -25.11% beat Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 24.73%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ACCO
    ACCO Brands
    32.53% $0.09 $1.5B
    PH
    Parker Hannifin
    36.83% $5.34 $23.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About ACCO or PH?

    ACCO Brands has a consensus price target of $10.83, signalling upside risk potential of 112%. On the other hand Parker Hannifin has an analysts' consensus of $738.41 which suggests that it could grow by 15.11%. Given that ACCO Brands has higher upside potential than Parker Hannifin, analysts believe ACCO Brands is more attractive than Parker Hannifin.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ACCO
    ACCO Brands
    1 0 0
    PH
    Parker Hannifin
    14 4 1
  • Is ACCO or PH More Risky?

    ACCO Brands has a beta of 1.684, which suggesting that the stock is 68.378% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.292%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACCO or PH?

    ACCO Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.87%. Parker Hannifin offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share. ACCO Brands pays -130.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Parker Hannifin pays out 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Parker Hannifin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ACCO or PH?

    ACCO Brands quarterly revenues are $420.9M, which are smaller than Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues of $4.9B. ACCO Brands's net income of $9.3M is lower than Parker Hannifin's net income of $698.4M. Notably, ACCO Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.48x while Parker Hannifin's PE ratio is 28.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACCO Brands is 0.29x versus 4.19x for Parker Hannifin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ACCO
    ACCO Brands
    0.29x 10.48x $420.9M $9.3M
    PH
    Parker Hannifin
    4.19x 28.97x $4.9B $698.4M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Is General Electric Stock Going Up?
Why Is General Electric Stock Going Up?

General Electric Company, doing business these days as GE Aerospace…

Where Will Cisco Systems Stock Be in 10 Years?
Where Will Cisco Systems Stock Be in 10 Years?

Cisco Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CSCO) has enjoyed its position as a…

Disney vs Estée Lauder Stock, Which Is Best?
Disney vs Estée Lauder Stock, Which Is Best?

Inflation has eaten away at a lot of the money…

Stock Ideas

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x

Sell
44
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Sell
1
IONQ alert for Jan 9

IonQ [IONQ] is down 38.82% over the past day.

Sell
40
QMCO alert for Jan 9

Quantum [QMCO] is down 30.08% over the past day.

Sell
47
MATW alert for Jan 9

Matthews International [MATW] is up 14.21% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock