UEC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CKX Lands has a net margin of -20.57% compared to Uranium Energy's net margin of 33.19%. Uranium Energy's return on equity of -8.09% beat CKX Lands's return on equity of 4.15%.

Uranium Energy has a consensus price target of $10.14, signalling upside risk potential of 54.15%. On the other hand CKX Lands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Uranium Energy has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, analysts believe Uranium Energy is more attractive than CKX Lands.

Uranium Energy has a beta of 1.351, which suggesting that the stock is 35.147% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands has a beta of -0.104, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.442%.

Uranium Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CKX Lands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uranium Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uranium Energy quarterly revenues are $49.8M, which are larger than CKX Lands quarterly revenues of $348.2K. Uranium Energy's net income of -$10.2M is lower than CKX Lands's net income of $115.6K. Notably, Uranium Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CKX Lands's PE ratio is 30.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uranium Energy is 47.17x versus 13.49x for CKX Lands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evolution Petroleum has a net margin of -20.57% compared to Uranium Energy's net margin of -9.66%. Uranium Energy's return on equity of -8.09% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of -0.9%.

Uranium Energy has a consensus price target of $10.14, signalling upside risk potential of 54.15%. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $6.15 which suggests that it could grow by 37.28%. Given that Uranium Energy has higher upside potential than Evolution Petroleum, analysts believe Uranium Energy is more attractive than Evolution Petroleum.

Uranium Energy has a beta of 1.351, which suggesting that the stock is 35.147% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.491, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.853%.

Uranium Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evolution Petroleum offers a yield of 10.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Uranium Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum pays out 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

Uranium Energy quarterly revenues are $49.8M, which are larger than Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues of $22.6M. Uranium Energy's net income of -$10.2M is lower than Evolution Petroleum's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Uranium Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evolution Petroleum's PE ratio is 90.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uranium Energy is 47.17x versus 1.72x for Evolution Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hallador Energy has a net margin of -20.57% compared to Uranium Energy's net margin of 8.47%. Uranium Energy's return on equity of -8.09% beat Hallador Energy's return on equity of -94.19%.

Uranium Energy has a consensus price target of $10.14, signalling upside risk potential of 54.15%. On the other hand Hallador Energy has an analysts' consensus of $20.67 which suggests that it could grow by 14.18%. Given that Uranium Energy has higher upside potential than Hallador Energy, analysts believe Uranium Energy is more attractive than Hallador Energy.

Uranium Energy has a beta of 1.351, which suggesting that the stock is 35.147% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hallador Energy has a beta of 0.421, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.93%.

Uranium Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hallador Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uranium Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hallador Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uranium Energy quarterly revenues are $49.8M, which are smaller than Hallador Energy quarterly revenues of $117.8M. Uranium Energy's net income of -$10.2M is lower than Hallador Energy's net income of $10M. Notably, Uranium Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hallador Energy's PE ratio is 9.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uranium Energy is 47.17x versus 1.85x for Hallador Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Centrus Energy has a net margin of -20.57% compared to Uranium Energy's net margin of 37.21%. Uranium Energy's return on equity of -8.09% beat Centrus Energy's return on equity of 94.73%.

Uranium Energy has a consensus price target of $10.14, signalling upside risk potential of 54.15%. On the other hand Centrus Energy has an analysts' consensus of $143.15 which suggests that it could grow by 11.96%. Given that Uranium Energy has higher upside potential than Centrus Energy, analysts believe Uranium Energy is more attractive than Centrus Energy.

Uranium Energy has a beta of 1.351, which suggesting that the stock is 35.147% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Centrus Energy has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.241%.

Uranium Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Centrus Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uranium Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Centrus Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uranium Energy quarterly revenues are $49.8M, which are smaller than Centrus Energy quarterly revenues of $73.1M. Uranium Energy's net income of -$10.2M is lower than Centrus Energy's net income of $27.2M. Notably, Uranium Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Centrus Energy's PE ratio is 20.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uranium Energy is 47.17x versus 4.51x for Centrus Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.