EPM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mexco Energy has a net margin of -9.66% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of 24.81%. Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of -0.9% beat Mexco Energy's return on equity of 7.6%.

Evolution Petroleum has a consensus price target of $6.15, signalling upside risk potential of 36.36%. On the other hand Mexco Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Evolution Petroleum has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum is more attractive than Mexco Energy.

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.491, which suggesting that the stock is 50.853% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mexco Energy has a beta of 0.378, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.229%.

Evolution Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.64%. Mexco Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Evolution Petroleum pays 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy pays out 15.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum's is not.

Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues are $22.6M, which are larger than Mexco Energy quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Evolution Petroleum's net income of -$2.2M is lower than Mexco Energy's net income of $469.1K. Notably, Evolution Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 90.00x while Mexco Energy's PE ratio is 11.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution Petroleum is 1.73x versus 2.06x for Mexco Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PEDEVCO has a net margin of -9.66% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of 1.6%. Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of -0.9% beat PEDEVCO's return on equity of 15.53%.

Evolution Petroleum has a consensus price target of $6.15, signalling upside risk potential of 36.36%. On the other hand PEDEVCO has an analysts' consensus of $1.83 which suggests that it could grow by 189.64%. Given that PEDEVCO has higher upside potential than Evolution Petroleum, analysts believe PEDEVCO is more attractive than Evolution Petroleum.

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.491, which suggesting that the stock is 50.853% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PEDEVCO has a beta of 0.298, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.166%.

Evolution Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.64%. PEDEVCO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evolution Petroleum pays 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. PEDEVCO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues are $22.6M, which are larger than PEDEVCO quarterly revenues of $8.7M. Evolution Petroleum's net income of -$2.2M is lower than PEDEVCO's net income of $140K. Notably, Evolution Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 90.00x while PEDEVCO's PE ratio is 3.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution Petroleum is 1.73x versus 1.41x for PEDEVCO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ring Energy has a net margin of -9.66% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of 11.52%. Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of -0.9% beat Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.47%.

Evolution Petroleum has a consensus price target of $6.15, signalling upside risk potential of 36.36%. On the other hand Ring Energy has an analysts' consensus of $3.47 which suggests that it could grow by 354.37%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Evolution Petroleum, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Evolution Petroleum.

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.491, which suggesting that the stock is 50.853% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy has a beta of 0.915, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.456%.

Evolution Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.64%. Ring Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evolution Petroleum pays 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues are $22.6M, which are smaller than Ring Energy quarterly revenues of $79.1M. Evolution Petroleum's net income of -$2.2M is lower than Ring Energy's net income of $9.1M. Notably, Evolution Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 90.00x while Ring Energy's PE ratio is 2.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution Petroleum is 1.73x versus 0.44x for Ring Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riley Exploration Permian has a net margin of -9.66% compared to Evolution Petroleum's net margin of 27.95%. Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of -0.9% beat Riley Exploration Permian's return on equity of 19.96%.

Evolution Petroleum has a consensus price target of $6.15, signalling upside risk potential of 36.36%. On the other hand Riley Exploration Permian has an analysts' consensus of $52.25 which suggests that it could grow by 100.73%. Given that Riley Exploration Permian has higher upside potential than Evolution Petroleum, analysts believe Riley Exploration Permian is more attractive than Evolution Petroleum.

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.491, which suggesting that the stock is 50.853% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riley Exploration Permian has a beta of 1.559, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.872%.

Evolution Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.64%. Riley Exploration Permian offers a yield of 5.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Evolution Petroleum pays 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian pays out 34.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Riley Exploration Permian's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum's is not.

Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues are $22.6M, which are smaller than Riley Exploration Permian quarterly revenues of $102.5M. Evolution Petroleum's net income of -$2.2M is lower than Riley Exploration Permian's net income of $28.6M. Notably, Evolution Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 90.00x while Riley Exploration Permian's PE ratio is 5.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution Petroleum is 1.73x versus 1.33x for Riley Exploration Permian. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.