MSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Koss has a net margin of -13.17% compared to Emerson Radio's net margin of 2.65%. Emerson Radio's return on equity of -12.82% beat Koss's return on equity of -2.41%.

Emerson Radio has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1020.83%. On the other hand Koss has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Emerson Radio has higher upside potential than Koss, analysts believe Emerson Radio is more attractive than Koss.

Emerson Radio has a beta of 0.423, which suggesting that the stock is 57.737% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Koss has a beta of -0.923, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 192.303%.

Emerson Radio has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Koss offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emerson Radio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koss pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Emerson Radio quarterly revenues are $4M, which are larger than Koss quarterly revenues of $3.6M. Emerson Radio's net income of -$527K is lower than Koss's net income of $94.1K. Notably, Emerson Radio's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.88x while Koss's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerson Radio is 0.84x versus 4.42x for Koss. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Algorhythm Holdings has a net margin of -13.17% compared to Emerson Radio's net margin of 11.25%. Emerson Radio's return on equity of -12.82% beat Algorhythm Holdings's return on equity of -136.66%.

Emerson Radio has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1020.83%. On the other hand Algorhythm Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32686.89%. Given that Algorhythm Holdings has higher upside potential than Emerson Radio, analysts believe Algorhythm Holdings is more attractive than Emerson Radio.

Emerson Radio has a beta of 0.423, which suggesting that the stock is 57.737% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Algorhythm Holdings has a beta of 0.166, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.398%.

Emerson Radio has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Algorhythm Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emerson Radio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Algorhythm Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Emerson Radio quarterly revenues are $4M, which are smaller than Algorhythm Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.6M. Emerson Radio's net income of -$527K is lower than Algorhythm Holdings's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Emerson Radio's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.88x while Algorhythm Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerson Radio is 0.84x versus 0.00x for Algorhythm Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Electronics has a net margin of -13.17% compared to Emerson Radio's net margin of -4.1%. Emerson Radio's return on equity of -12.82% beat Universal Electronics's return on equity of -14.61%.

Emerson Radio has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1020.83%. On the other hand Universal Electronics has an analysts' consensus of $13.67 which suggests that it could grow by 108.33%. Given that Emerson Radio has higher upside potential than Universal Electronics, analysts believe Emerson Radio is more attractive than Universal Electronics.

Emerson Radio has a beta of 0.423, which suggesting that the stock is 57.737% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Electronics has a beta of 1.215, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.469%.

Emerson Radio has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Universal Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emerson Radio pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Emerson Radio quarterly revenues are $4M, which are smaller than Universal Electronics quarterly revenues of $110.5M. Emerson Radio's net income of -$527K is higher than Universal Electronics's net income of -$4.5M. Notably, Emerson Radio's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.88x while Universal Electronics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emerson Radio is 0.84x versus 0.22x for Universal Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.