UEIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Koss has a net margin of -6.8% compared to Universal Electronics's net margin of -11.39%. Universal Electronics's return on equity of -13.64% beat Koss's return on equity of -2.43%.

Universal Electronics has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 84.14%. On the other hand Koss has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Universal Electronics has higher upside potential than Koss, analysts believe Universal Electronics is more attractive than Koss.

Universal Electronics has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.105% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Koss has a beta of -1.602, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 260.199%.

Universal Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Koss offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Koss pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Universal Electronics quarterly revenues are $92.3M, which are larger than Koss quarterly revenues of $2.8M. Universal Electronics's net income of -$6.3M is lower than Koss's net income of -$316.7K. Notably, Universal Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Koss's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Electronics is 0.23x versus 4.60x for Koss. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Emerson Radio has a net margin of -6.8% compared to Universal Electronics's net margin of -13.17%. Universal Electronics's return on equity of -13.64% beat Emerson Radio's return on equity of -12.82%.

Universal Electronics has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 84.14%. On the other hand Emerson Radio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1099.33%. Given that Emerson Radio has higher upside potential than Universal Electronics, analysts believe Emerson Radio is more attractive than Universal Electronics.

Universal Electronics has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.105% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emerson Radio has a beta of 0.316, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.431%.

Universal Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Emerson Radio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Radio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Universal Electronics quarterly revenues are $92.3M, which are larger than Emerson Radio quarterly revenues of $4M. Universal Electronics's net income of -$6.3M is lower than Emerson Radio's net income of -$527K. Notably, Universal Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Emerson Radio's PE ratio is 22.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Electronics is 0.23x versus 0.79x for Emerson Radio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Algorhythm Holdings has a net margin of -6.8% compared to Universal Electronics's net margin of -461.16%. Universal Electronics's return on equity of -13.64% beat Algorhythm Holdings's return on equity of -136.66%.

Universal Electronics has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 84.14%. On the other hand Algorhythm Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 33372.8%. Given that Algorhythm Holdings has higher upside potential than Universal Electronics, analysts believe Algorhythm Holdings is more attractive than Universal Electronics.

Universal Electronics has a beta of 1.441, which suggesting that the stock is 44.105% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Algorhythm Holdings has a beta of 0.206, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.417%.

Universal Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Algorhythm Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Algorhythm Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Universal Electronics quarterly revenues are $92.3M, which are larger than Algorhythm Holdings quarterly revenues of $2M. Universal Electronics's net income of -$6.3M is higher than Algorhythm Holdings's net income of -$9.2M. Notably, Universal Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Algorhythm Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Electronics is 0.23x versus 0.11x for Algorhythm Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.