MCRP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intellinetics has a net margin of -- compared to Micropolis Holding's net margin of -17.13%. Micropolis Holding's return on equity of -- beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -10.61%.

Micropolis Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 33.69%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than Micropolis Holding, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than Micropolis Holding.

Micropolis Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.548, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.204%.

Micropolis Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Micropolis Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Micropolis Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.2M. Micropolis Holding's net income of -- is lower than Intellinetics's net income of -$727.6K. Notably, Micropolis Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Micropolis Holding is -- versus 3.21x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -- compared to Micropolis Holding's net margin of -4.72%. Micropolis Holding's return on equity of -- beat Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12%.

Micropolis Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.48 which suggests that it could grow by 267.37%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Micropolis Holding, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Micropolis Holding.

Micropolis Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.643%.

Micropolis Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Micropolis Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Micropolis Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.7M. Micropolis Holding's net income of -- is lower than Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Micropolis Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Micropolis Holding is -- versus 0.61x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -- compared to Micropolis Holding's net margin of -2.12%. Micropolis Holding's return on equity of -- beat WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61%.

Micropolis Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 149.17%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Micropolis Holding, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Micropolis Holding.

Micropolis Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.805, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.475%.

Micropolis Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Micropolis Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Micropolis Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.2M. Micropolis Holding's net income of -- is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K. Notably, Micropolis Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Micropolis Holding is -- versus 0.20x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yalla Group has a net margin of -- compared to Micropolis Holding's net margin of 44.22%. Micropolis Holding's return on equity of -- beat Yalla Group's return on equity of 21.19%.

Micropolis Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Yalla Group has an analysts' consensus of $8.10 which suggests that it could grow by 17.39%. Given that Yalla Group has higher upside potential than Micropolis Holding, analysts believe Yalla Group is more attractive than Micropolis Holding.

Micropolis Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yalla Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Micropolis Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Yalla Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Micropolis Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yalla Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Micropolis Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Yalla Group quarterly revenues of $83.9M. Micropolis Holding's net income of -- is lower than Yalla Group's net income of $37.1M. Notably, Micropolis Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Yalla Group's PE ratio is 8.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Micropolis Holding is -- versus 3.66x for Yalla Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.