XCH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CBAK Energy Technology has a net margin of -10.57% compared to XCHG's net margin of -4.52%. XCHG's return on equity of -- beat CBAK Energy Technology's return on equity of 0.3%.

XCHG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CBAK Energy Technology has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 50%. Given that CBAK Energy Technology has higher upside potential than XCHG, analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology is more attractive than XCHG.

XCHG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 1.740, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.998%.

XCHG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CBAK Energy Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XCHG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CBAK Energy Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XCHG quarterly revenues are $9M, which are smaller than CBAK Energy Technology quarterly revenues of $34.9M. XCHG's net income of -$951.2K is higher than CBAK Energy Technology's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, XCHG's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CBAK Energy Technology's PE ratio is 5,102.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XCHG is 2.10x versus 0.59x for CBAK Energy Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EHang Holdings has a net margin of -10.57% compared to XCHG's net margin of -299.26%. XCHG's return on equity of -- beat EHang Holdings's return on equity of -35.14%.

XCHG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EHang Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $27.26 which suggests that it could grow by 68.05%. Given that EHang Holdings has higher upside potential than XCHG, analysts believe EHang Holdings is more attractive than XCHG.

XCHG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EHang Holdings has a beta of 1.061, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.127%.

XCHG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EHang Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XCHG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EHang Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XCHG quarterly revenues are $9M, which are larger than EHang Holdings quarterly revenues of $3.6M. XCHG's net income of -$951.2K is higher than EHang Holdings's net income of -$10.7M. Notably, XCHG's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EHang Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XCHG is 2.10x versus 19.22x for EHang Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a net margin of -10.57% compared to XCHG's net margin of --. XCHG's return on equity of -- beat NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's return on equity of 8.22%.

XCHG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2006.48%. Given that NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has higher upside potential than XCHG, analysts believe NiSun International Enterprise Development Group is more attractive than XCHG.

XCHG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a beta of 1.244, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.354%.

XCHG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XCHG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XCHG quarterly revenues are $9M, which are larger than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group quarterly revenues of --. XCHG's net income of -$951.2K is higher than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's net income of --. Notably, XCHG's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's PE ratio is 3.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XCHG is 2.10x versus 0.05x for NiSun International Enterprise Development Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a net margin of -10.57% compared to XCHG's net margin of --. XCHG's return on equity of -- beat MingZhu Logistics Holdings's return on equity of --.

XCHG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MingZhu Logistics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that XCHG has higher upside potential than MingZhu Logistics Holdings, analysts believe XCHG is more attractive than MingZhu Logistics Holdings.

XCHG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

XCHG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MingZhu Logistics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XCHG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MingZhu Logistics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XCHG quarterly revenues are $9M, which are larger than MingZhu Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues of --. XCHG's net income of -$951.2K is higher than MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net income of --. Notably, XCHG's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MingZhu Logistics Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XCHG is 2.10x versus 0.18x for MingZhu Logistics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.